Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic Properties of Continuous and Discrete Models in Fluid Dynamics

  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article investigates the propagation of small perturbations in fluids whose dynamics is described by Euler and Navier–Stokes equations or by a quasi-fluid-dynamic system derived from the difference approximation of the Boltzmann equation. The problem of wave reflection from the artificial boundaries of the numerical region is solved using various boundary conditions. The analysis is repeated for difference approximations of fluid-dynamic equations. The procedure is tested for viscous subsonic flow past a plate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. V. Dorodnitsyn, Acoustic Waves and Boundary Conditions in Viscous Subsonic Flow Models [in Russian], Dialog-MGU, Moscow (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. V. Dorodnitsyn, “Acoustics in viscous subsonic flow models and nonreflecting boundary conditions,” in: Applied Mathematics and Informatics [in Russian], No. 3, Izd. Dialog-MGU, Moscow (1999), pp. 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. N. Chetverushkin, Kinetically-Consistent Schemes in Fluid Dynamics: A New Viscous Fluid Model, Algorithms, Parallel Implementation, and Applications [in Russian], Izd. MGU, Moscow (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. V. Dorodnitsyn and B. N. Chetverushkin, “An implicit scheme for subsonic fluid flow simulation,” Matem. Modelirovanie, 9, No. 5, 108–118 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. W. Thompson, “Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems,” J. Comp. Phys., 89, No. 2, 439–461 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Engquist and A. Majda, “Numerical radiation boundary conditions for unsteady transonic flow,” J. Comp. Phys., 40, No. 1, 91–103 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bayliss and E. Turkel, “Far field boundary conditions for compressible flows,” J. Comp. Phys., 48, No. 2, 182–199 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Givoli, “Non-reflecting boundary conditions,” J. Comp. Phys., 94, No. 1, 1–29 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. B. Giles, “Nonreflecting boundary conditions for Euler equation calculations,” AIAA J., 28, No. 12, 2050–2058 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Tourrette, “Artificial boundary conditions for the linearized compressible Navier-Stokes equations,” J. Comp. Phys., 137, No. 1, 1–37 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. L. Higdon, “Numerical absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation,” Math. Comp., 49, 65–90 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. M. Ramahi, “Complementary boundary operators for wave propagation problems,” Comp. Phys., 133, No. 1, 113–128 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Tourrette, “Artificial boundary conditions for the linearized compressible Navier-Stokes equations. II. The discrete approach,” J. Comp. Phys., 144, No. 1, 151–179 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Gustafsson and A. Sundstrum, “Incompletely parabolic problems in fluid dynamics,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 35, No. 2, 343–357 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. L. Higdon, “Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic waves in stratified media,” J. Comp. Phys., 101, No. 2, 386–418 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. L. Higdon, “Radiation boundary conditions for dispersive waves,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 31, No. 1, 64–100 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. K. W. Tam and J. C. Webb, “Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics,” J. Comp. Phys., 107, No. 2, 262–281 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. A. Samarskii, Theory of Difference Schemes [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dorodnitsyn, L.V. Acoustic Properties of Continuous and Discrete Models in Fluid Dynamics. Computational Mathematics and Modeling 12, 219–242 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012593306378

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012593306378

Keywords

Navigation