Skip to main content
Log in

Constitutional Implications of Electoral Assumptions

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper discusses the implications of three models of elections (the median voter model, the proportional representation model, and the probabilistic voting model) on three functions of constitutional rules (constraining the majority of the people, monitoring political and bureaucratic agents, and keeping separate the levels of constitutional rules and of ordinary politics).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. (1991 - 1998) We the People: 1. Foundations (1991), 2. Transformations (1998). Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., and Banks, J. (1988) “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82: 405–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. (1997) “Rational Choice Political Theory.” In: Vincent, A. (ed.) Political Theory: Tradition and Diversity, pp. 89–111. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Hamlin, A. (1998) “Constitutional Economics.” In: Newman, P. (ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, vol. 1, pp. 401–10. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1996) Competitive Governments: An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosio, G. (1988) “Patronage and Bureaucratic Efficiency.” European Journal of Political Economy 4, Extra Issue: 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975) “The Political Economy of Franchise in the Welfare State.” In: Selden, R. T. (ed.) Capitalism and Freedom: Problems and Prospects, pp. 52–77. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Congleton, R. D. (1998) Politics By Principle, Not Interest: Towards Nondiscriminatory Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Musgrave, R. A. (1999) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P. J. (1992) Probabilistic Voting Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W. (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. (1996) The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1989) “Why a Constitution?” In: Grofman, B., and Wittman, D. (eds.) The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, pp. 100–20. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. E. (1998) “Political Economy and Political Correctness.” Public Choice 96: 219–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G. (2000) “Probabilistic Voting and Equilibrium: An Impossibility Result.” Public Choice 103: 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafay, J.-D. (1993) “The Silent Revolution of Probabilistic Voting.” In: Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., and Wintrobe, R. (eds.) Preferences and Democracy: Villa Colombella Papers, pp. 159–91. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1987) Models of Business Cycles. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. H., Cukierman, A., and Richard, S. F. (1991) Political Economy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. H., and Richard, S. F. (1981) “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merville, L. J., and Osborne, D. K. (1990) “Constitutional Democracy and the Theory of Agency.” Constitutional Political Economy 1(3): 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. R. (1996) “Majority Rules and Minority Interests.” In: Shapiro, I., and Hardin, R. (eds.) Political Order (Nomos XXXVIII), pp. 207–250. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (1989) Public Choice II. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (1996) Constitutional Democracy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1997) “Economic Analysis of Political Institutions: An Introduction.” In: Kreps, D. M., and Wallis, K. F. (eds.) Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Seventh World Congress, vol. 1, pp. 46–65. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1999) “Theoretical Comparisons of Electoral Systems.” European Economic Review 43: 671–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1993) “Institutions and Credible Commitments.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P. C. (1993) “Some Rules of Constitutional Design.” In: Franken Paul, E., Miller, F. D., and Paul, J. (eds.) Liberalism and the Economic Order, pp. 198–232. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. (1990) Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics. Chur and London: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. (1999) “Political Economics and Public Finance.” NBER Working Paper 7097. Forthcoming in: Auerbach, A., and Feldstein, M. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1945) The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. I: Plato, 5th ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1988) “On Democracy: The Open Society and Its Enemies Revisited.” The Economist, 23 April: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. (1982) Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, T. (1975) “Individual Welfare, Majority Voting and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 7: 163–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. (1993) “Unpopular Policies and the Theory of Representative Democracy.” In: Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., and Wintrobe, R. (eds.) Preferences and Democracy: Villa Colombella Papers, pp. 13–39. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. (1998) “Free Riding as Mechanism.” In: Backhouse, R., Hausman, D., Mäki, U., and Salanti, A. (eds.) Economics and Methodology: Crossing Boundaries, pp. 62–87. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. (2000) “Modèles et mécanismes en économie: essai de clarification de leurs relations.” Revue de Philosophie Economique 1(1): 104–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. (2001) “Ordinary Elections and Constitutional Arrangements.” In: Mudambi, R., Navarra, P., and Sobbrio, G. (eds.) Rules and Reason: Perspectives on Constitutional Political Economy, pp. 165–80. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P., and Wolfelsperger, A. (2001) “FrDe l'èquilibre au chaos et retour: bilan méthodologique des recherches sur la règle de majoritè.” Revue Française de Science Politique 51(3): 331–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. A. (1979) “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. A., and Weingast, B. R. (eds.) (1995) Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, G. A. (1996) (ed.) Constitutional Politics in the States: Contemporary Controversies and Historical Patterns. Westport and London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1998) “Reply to Guttman.” European Journal of Political Economy 14: 215–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (1999) Explaining Constitutional Change: A Positive Economics Approach. Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (Mass.): Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salmon, P. Constitutional Implications of Electoral Assumptions. Constitutional Political Economy 12, 333–349 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012581007940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012581007940

Navigation