Skip to main content
Log in

Two‐fluid hydrodynamic model of a bubble flow

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics Aims and scope

Abstract

A computational model for an unsteady one‐dimensional gas–liquid flow taking into account gravity is proposed. The model includes the Zuber–Findlay relation and solutions of the Cauchy problem close to the solutions of drift models. It is shown that the effect of attached mass has a significant influence on the acoustic characteristics of the system of equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. I. Nigmatulin, Dynamics of Multiphase Media, Hemisphere, New York (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. H. Ransom, RELAP5/MOD1 Code Manual, Vol 1: Code Structure, System Models, and Numerical Method, NUREG/CR-1826 (1982).

  3. F. Barre and M. Bernard, “ The CATHARE code strategy and assessment, ” Nuclear Eng. Design, 124, 257-284 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Zuber and J. A. Findlay, “ Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems, ” J. Heat Transfer, No. 12, 453-540 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Drew, L. Cheng, and R. T. Lahey, “ The analysis of virtual mass effects in two-phase flow, ” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 5, No. 4, 233-242 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Kroshilin and V. E. Kroshilin, “ Calculation of the interphase force in a monodisperse bubble medium with an ideal carrier phase and chaotic distribution of inclusions, ” Prikl. Mekh. Tekh. Fiz., No. 5, 95-103 (1986).

  7. H. Stadtke, G. Franchello, and B. Worth, “ Numerical simulation of multi-dimensional two-phase flow based on hyperbolic flow equations, ” in: Proc. 31st Meeting of Europ. Two-phase Flow Group (Piacenza, Italy, June 6-8, 1994), Part 1 (1994), pp. 783-798.

  8. A. R. Edwards and T. P. O'Brien, “ Studies of phenomena connected with the depressurization of water reactors, ” J. Brit. Nuclear Eng. Soc., 9, No. 2, 125-135 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. I. Nigmatulin, “ Drift ux model, as approximation of two fluid model for two-phase dispersed and slug flow in tube, ” in: Scholarship at Rensselaer Polytecnic. Institute (U.S.A., 1994), S.l. (1994), pp. 141-163.

  10. G. Wallis, One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. L. Kantsyrev and R. I. Nigmatulin, “ Countercurrent flow in pressurized light water reactor, ” in: Proc. 5th Int. Topical Meeting on Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-5) (Salt Lake City, U.S.A., Sept. 21-24, 1992), S.l., 5 (1992), pp. 1473-1474.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Sobajima, “ Experimental modeling of steam-water countercurrent flow limit for perforated plates, ” J. Nuclear Sci. Technol., 22, 723-732 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Taitel and D. Barnea, “ Countercurrent gas-liquid vertical flow, model for flow pattern and pressure drop, ” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 9, No. 6, 637-647 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. M. Ghiaasiaan, “ Countercurrent two-phase flow regimes and void fraction in vertical and inclined channels, ” Nuclear Sci. Eng., 119, No. 3, 182-187 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kantsyrev, B.L., Ashbaev, A.A. Two‐fluid hydrodynamic model of a bubble flow. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 42, 979–985 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012557609765

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012557609765

Keywords

Navigation