Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A gap approach to exploring quality of life in mental health

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving quality of life (QoL) is an important treatment outcome for the serious mentally ill. There is, however, a need for an instrument which both captures consumers own assessments and gives direct information for intervention. A useful approach is to define QoL as the gap between actual and ideal life circumstances, which is weighted by importance. In this paper we detail how we developed and evaluated a QoL instrument which follows this model. This instrument, the (QoL-GAP), is based on self-appraised items within various life domains. For each item respondents firstly identify what they have (actual) and then what they would like (ideal). They then rate the item for its importance and make any comments. A weighted gap score for each item is subsequently derived from the ideal–actual gap being weighted by the importance rating. This weighted gap score is then related to domain satisfaction ratings, while their average from each domain is related to overall satisfaction and well-being. We surveyed 120 individuals with a serious and enduring mental illness living in different types of residences, such as psychiatric hospitals, hostels, or their own homes, in a largely urban part of Queensland. Sixty-eight percent were males, and 92% had schizophrenia or related disorders. We found that our approach demonstrated good psychometric properties, and that the model-based predictions were borne out: weighted gap measures were consistently more strongly related to domain satisfaction than were the actual circumstances alone. While further work is being undertaken – in such matters as short-forms and further evaluation of the QoL-GAP in a longitudinal study – our results suggest that this (gap) approach helps consumers state their own goals and give their opinions – and so is particularly relevant for consumer-focused mental health delivery and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainfort F, Becker M, Diamond R. Judgements of quality of life of individuals with severe mental disorders: patient self-report versus provider perspectives. Am J Psychiat 1996; 153: 497–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stedman T. Approaches to measuring quality of life and their relevance to mental health. Aust New Zealand J Psychiat 1996; 30: 731–740.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Katschnig H. How useful is the concept of quality of life in psychiatry? Curr Opinions Psychiat 1997; 10: 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dantendorfer K, Bullinger M, Katschnig H. The improvement of quality of life: A purpose of health care. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 611.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenley JR, Greenberg JS, Brown R. Measuring quality of life: A new and practical survey instrument. Social Work 1997; 42: 244–254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehman AF. Developing an outcomes-oriented approach for the treatment of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiat 1999; Suppl 19: 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calman KC. Quality of life in cancer patients — an hypothesis. J Med Ethics 1984; 124–127.

  8. Hunt SM. The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res 1997; 205–212.

  9. Sirgy MJ, Cole D, Kosenko R, et al. A life satisfaction measure: Additional validational data for the Congruity Life Satisfaction measure. Social Indicators Res 1995; 34: 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Russo J, Roy BP, Reeder D, et al. Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in acute psychiatric inpatients: Reliability and validity. J Nervous Mental Disord 1997; 185: 166–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trauer T, Duckmanton RA, Chiu E. A study of the quality of life of the severely mentally ill. Int J Social Psychiat 1998; 44: 79–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orley J, Saxena S, Herrman H. Quality of life and mental illness — reflections from the perspective of the WHOQOL. Brit J Psychiat 1998; 172: 291–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Headey B, Wearing A. Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-being. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brickman P, Coates D, Janoof-Bullman R. Lottery winners and accident-victims: Is happiness relative? J Personality Social Psychol 1978; 36: 917–927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Diamond R. Drugs and the quality of life. J Clin Psychiat 1985; 46: 29–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cagle LT, Banks SM. The validity of assessing mental health needs with social indicators. Eval Program Planning 1986; 9: 127–142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cummins RA. The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: Intellectual Disability. Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Atkinson T. The stability and validity of quality of life measure. Social Indicators Res 1982; 10: 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Battista R, Hodge M. Quality of life research and health technology assessment — a time for synergy. Quality Life Res 1996; 5: 413–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goering PN, Streiner DL. Reconcilable differences: The marriage of qualitative and quantitative methods. Can J Psychiat 1996; 418: 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith J. Qualitative methodology: Analyzing participants' perspectives. Curr Opinions Psychiat 1996; 9: 417–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eisen SV, Grob M, Dill DL. Outcome measurement: Tapping the patient's perspective. In: Mirin SM, Gossett JT, Grob MC (eds), Psychiatric Treatment: Advances in Outcome Research, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Diener E, Sandvik E, Pavot W, Gallagher D. Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Res 1991; 24: 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mechanic D, McAlpine D, Rosenfield S, Davis D. Effects of illness attribution and depression on the quality of life among persons with serious mental illness. Social Sci Med 1994; 39: 155–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Corrigan PW, Buican B. The construct validity of subjective quality of life for the severely mentally ill. J Nervous Mental Disord 1995; 183: 281–285.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Larsen EB, Gerlach J. Subjective experience of treatment, side-effects, mental state and quality of life in chronic schizophrenic out-patients treated with depot neuroleptics. Acta Psychiat Scand 1996; 93: 381–388.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lehman AF. A Quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Eval Program Planning 1988; 11: 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mercier C, King S. A latent variable causal model of the quality of life and community tenure of psychotic patients. Acta Psychiat Scand 1994; 89: 72–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kemmler G, Holzner B, Neudorfer C, Meise U, Hinterhuber H. General life satisfaction and domain-specific quality of life in chronic schizophrenic patients. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 265–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thappa K, Rowland LA. Quality of life perspectives in long-term care: Staff and patient perceptions. Acta Psychiat Scand 1989; 80: 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Najman JM, Levine S. Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: A critique and review. Social Sci Med 1981; 15: 107–115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meadow HL, Mentzer JT, Rahtz D, Sirgy MJ. A life satisfaction measure based on judgement theory. Qual Life Res 1992; 26: 23–59.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Michalos AC. Multiple discrepancies theory. Social Indicators Res 1985; 16: 347–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How should we measure ‘change’ — or should we? Psychol Bull 1970; 74: 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogosa D, Brandt D, Zimowski MA. Growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychol Bull 1982; 92: 726–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sartorius N, Janca A. Psychiatric assessment instruments developed by the World Health Organization. Social Psychiat Psychiat Epidemiol 1996; 31: 55–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Henderson AS, Byrne DG, Duncan-Jones P. Neurosis and the Social Environment, Academic Press, 1981.

  38. Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Assessment, 1996. Word97, Microsoft Corporation.

  40. Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality. New York: Plenum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kozma A, Stones MJ. The measurement of happiness: Development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland happiness scale MUNSCH. J Gerontol 1980; 35: 906–912.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosen A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Parker G. The Life Skills Profile: A measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Psychol Med 1989; 20: 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lehman AF. The well-being of chronic mental patients. Arch Gen Psychiat 1983; A-52.

  44. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper Row, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bartko JJ, Carpenter WT. On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nervous Mental Disord 1976; 1635: 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Veenhoven R. Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Res 1996; 37: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwartz N, Strack F. Evaluating one's life; a judgment model of subjective well-being. In: Strack F (ed), Subjective Well-being, an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Pergamon, 1991; 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Headey B, Veenhoven R, Wearing A. Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Res 1991: 24(1): 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stones MJ, Kozma A, Hirdes J, Gold D. Short happiness and affect research protocol (SHARP). Social Indicators Res 1996: 37(1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 1984; 95: 542–575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Veenhoven R. Conditions of Happiness. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland Centre for Schizophrenia Research, Wolston Park Hospital, Australia

    Joy Welham, Dianne Mercer & Terry Stedman

  2. The Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Chermside, 4032, Queensland, Australia

    Mary Haire

Authors
  1. Joy Welham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Haire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dianne Mercer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Terry Stedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welham, J., Haire, M., Mercer, D. et al. A gap approach to exploring quality of life in mental health. Qual Life Res 10, 421–429 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012549622363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012549622363

Search

Navigation