Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Product Innovation: Delving into the Organization's Black Box

Journal of Market-Focused Management volume 5, pages 5–23 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

Many scholars now agree that market orientation is necessary, but not sufficient to facilitate the type of innovation that breeds long-term competitive advantage (cf. Dickson, 1996). In addition to a strong market orientation, a firm must also be able to institutionalize higher order learning processes, the type of learning that enables radical innovation. Recent research (cf. Baker and Sinkula, 1999) has empirically established a synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. This paper attempts to add to the literature by offering a more complete theoretical explanation of how these two constructs interact to affect product innovation capabilities. Three types of marketing firms are identified. Phase I firms learn primarily through modeling and are typically limited to manager-driven incremental innovation. Phase II firms learn primarily through adaptive learning and are typically limited to market-driven incremental innovation. Phase III firms engage in generative learning and pursue ongoing radical innovation. We propose that only Phase III firms are capable of maintaining competitive advantage in dynamic market environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Argyris, C. (1994), “Good Communication that Blocks Learning,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 (July-August), pp. 77-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., and Sinkula, J. M. (1999a), “The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27 (Fall), pp. 411-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., and Sinkula, J. M. (1999b), “Learning Orientation, Market Orientation and Innovation: Integrating and Extending Models of Organizational Performance,” Journal of Market Focused Management, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1980), Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation,” Organization Science, Vol. 2 (February), pp. 40-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, G., Mobley, S., and Marshall, L. (1994), “Grasping the Learning Organization,” Training and Development 48 (June), pp. 38-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., and Levanthal, D. A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35 (March), pp. 128-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 (October), pp. 37-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S., and Nedungadi, P. (1994), “Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 (April), pp. 31-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., and Webster, F. E. (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 (January), pp. 23-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. R. (1996), “The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan's Comparative Advantage Theory,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 (October), pp. 102-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. N. (1986), Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage, New York, NY: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, F. W. (1985), “'Big Bang' Management: Creative Innovation,” The McKinsey Quarterly (Spring), pp. 49-59.

  • Hamel, G., and Prahlad, C. K. (1994), Competing for the Future: Breathrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets for Tomorrow, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. K., Kim, N., and Srivastava, R.K. (1998), “Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation the Missing Link?” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 (October), pp. 30-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J., and Sharifi, S. (1989), “Corporate Culture and Strategic Change,” Journal of General Management, Vol. 15 (Winter), pp. 4-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B. (1981), “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn.” In: Nystrom P. C., and Starbuck W. H., (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, pp. 3-27, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, W. N. (1993), “Taking Flight, Dialogue, Collective Thinking and Organizational Learning,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 22 (Autumn), pp. 24-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jashapapa, A. (1993), “The Competitive Learning Organization: A Quest for the Holy Grail,” Management Decision, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 52-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., and Kohli, A. K. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 (July), pp. 53-70.

  • Kohli, A. K., and Jaworski, B. J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 (April), pp. 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1991), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., and Galbraith, J. R. (1994), “Avoiding the Corporate Dinosaur Syndrome,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 23 (Autumn), pp. 4-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Courtney, J. F., and O'Keefe, R. M. (1992), “A System for Organizational Learning Using Cognitive Maps,” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 20 (Spring), pp. 23-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, M. E., and Slocum, J. W. (1993), “Unlearning the Organization,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 22 (Autumn), pp. 67-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, D. (1992), “An Organizational Learning Approach to Product Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9 (September), pp. 232-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., and Slater, S.F. (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 (October), pp. 20-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J., and Gould, J. M. (1995), “Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36 (Winter), pp. 73-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991), “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 (November-December), pp. 96-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, W. R., and Peter, J. P. (1980), “A Behavior Modification Perspective on Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44 (Spring), pp. 36-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. (1985), “Developing Capabilities for Organizational Learning.” In: Pennings J. M., (ed.), Organizational Strategy and Change, pp. 217-48, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom, P. C., and Starbuck, W. H. (1984), “To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 13 (Spring), pp. 53-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A., and Whip, R. (1991), Managing Change for Competitive Success, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. L., and Gaidis, W. C. (1981), “Behavioral Learning Theory: Its Relevance to Marketing and Promotions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45 (Spring), pp. 70-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1993), “How Can Organizations Learn Faster? The Challenge of Entering the Green Room,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 34 (Winter), pp. 85-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (1989), “Innovation and Applied Failure,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67 (November-December), pp. 42-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, J. M. (1994), “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 (January), pp. 35-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W., and Noordewier, T. G. (1997), “A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge and Behavior,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 (Fall), pp. 305-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., and Narver, J. C. (1995), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 (July), pp. 63-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H., and Hedberg, B. L. T. (1977), “Saving an Organization from a Stagnating Environment.” In: Thorelli H. B., (ed.), Strategy + Structure = Performance, pp. 249-258, Bloomington, IN: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-8239

    William E. Baker (Associate Professor of Marketing)

  2. The University of Vermont, 206 Kalkin Hall, Burlington, VT, 05405-0156

    James M. Sinkula (Professor of Business)

Authors
  1. William E. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James M. Sinkula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M. Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Product Innovation: Delving into the Organization's Black Box. Journal of Market-Focused Management 5, 5–23 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012543911149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012543911149

Search

Navigation