Skip to main content
Log in

The effectiveness of end-of-life re-orbiting for debris mitigation in geostationary orbit

  • Published:
Space Debris

Abstract

The effect of satellite breakups over 72 years, as a function of the end-of-life re-orbiting altitude (0–2000 km), was analyzed in terms of fragment contribution to the object density in the geostationary orbit (GEO) ring, both in the short- and long-term. In the short-term, the explosions in GEO are the most detrimental for the GEO ring environment, though the average fragment density in the ring is never higher than 1/5 of the background, decreasing to less than 1/100 of the existing environment after 4 years (apart from a density rebound 5 decades later, due to luni-solar perturbations). Spacecraft end-of-life re-orbiting is a possible mitigation solution. But the re-orbiting altitude is critical if explosions continue to occur. In order to reduce the post-event average density by 1 order of magnitude with respect to an explosion occurring in GEO, more than 500 km of re-orbiting is needed. Concerning the long-term environmental impact, the re-orbiting strategy supported by Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) seems adequate to guarantee, after 2–3 years, a long-term average density of fragments in the GEO ring of at least 2 orders of magnitude below the existing background. But at least 1000 km of re-orbiting are needed to stay below that threshold in the short-term too. In conclusion, the re-orbiting strategy recommended by IADC is totally adequate in the long-term, but only if satellite passivation is extensively carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Anselmo and C. Pardini. The Effects of Spacecraft and Upper Stage Breakups on the Geostationary Ring. Internal Report, CNUCE-B4-2000-002, CNR, Pisa, Italy 2000 (submitted to The Journal of Astronautical Sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  • V.A. Chobotov. Disposal of Spacecraft at End-of-Life in Geosynchronous Orbit. In Astrodynamics 1989, AAS Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 71, Univelt Inc., San Diego, CA, pages 377–391, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Fenoglio and W. Flury. Long-Term Evolution of Geostationary and Near-Geostationary Orbits. MAS Working Paper No. 260, Mission Analysis Section, European Space Operation Centre, ESA, Darmstadt, Germany, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Friesen, A.A. Jackson IV, H.A. Zook and D.J. Kessler. Results in Orbital Evolution of Objects in the Geosynchronous Region. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 15: 263–267, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Fusco and A. Buratti. Crowding of the Geostationary Orbit. Final Report, ESA Contract No. 5705/83/NL/PP (SC), RIPTO, Turin, Italy, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hechler and J.C. Van der Ha. Probability of Collisions in the Geostationary Ring. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 18: 361–366, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hernandez and R. Jehn. Classification of Geostationary Objects: Issue 2. Mission Analysis Section, European Space Operation Centre, ESA, Darmstadt, Germany, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee. Space Debris Issues in the Geostationary Orbit and the Geostationary Transfer Orbits. Presented to the 37th Session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, United Nations, Vienna, Austria, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jehn. Collision Risk with Fragments from On-Orbit Breakups. In 48th International Astronautical Congress, Turin, Italy, 6–10 October, Paper IAA-97-IAA.6.4.04, 1997.

  • N.L. Johnson, A. Bade, P. Eichler, E. Cizek, S. Robertson and T. Settecerri. History of On-Orbit Satellite Fragmentations. Eleventh edn. JSC-28383, Johnson Space Center, NASA, Houston, Texas, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.F. Kamprath and A.B. Jenkin. Debris Collision Hazard from Breakups in the Geosynchronous Ring. (submitted) Space Debris.

  • J.H. Kwok. The Artificial Satellite Analysis Program (ASAP). Version 2.0, JPL NPO-17522, Pasadena, CA, 1987.

  • R. McNamara and R.D. Culp. The Investigation of Space Debris Generation and Associated Long-Term Effects in the Geosynchronous Region. In AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 14–17 August, Paper AAS 95-347, 1995.

  • C. Pardini. Development of a Single Fragmentation Event Simulator (CLDSIM). Study Note of Work Package 3600, Study on Long Term Evolution of Earth Orbiting Debris, ESA/ESOC Contract No. 10034/92/D/IM(SC), Consorzio Pisa Ricerche, Pisa, Italy, 1995.

  • C. Pardini, L. Anselmo, A. Rossi, A. Cordelli and P. Farinella. A New Orbital Debris Reference Model. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 46: 249–265, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Reynolds. Review of Current Activities to Model and Measure the Orbital Debris Environment in Low-Earth-Orbit. Advances in Space Research, 10: 359–372, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.Y. Su and D.J. Kessler. Contribution of Explosion and Future Collision Fragments to the Orbital Debris Environment. Advances in Space Research, 5: 25–34, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Talent, A.E. Potter and K.G. Henize. A Search for Debris in GEO. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-393, Darmstadt, Germany, pages 279–284, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.H. Vaughan and T.L. Mullikin. Long Term Behavior of Inactive Satellites and Debris near Geosynchronous Orbits. In AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, 13–16 February, Paper AAS 95–200, 1995.

  • J.D. Vedder and J.L. Tabor. Long-Term Evolution of Uncontrolled Geosynchronous Orbits: Orbital Debris Implications. In AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Durango, CO, 19–22 August, Paper AAS 91–372, 1991.

  • T. Yasaka. Remarks on Orbital Environment Protection at Geostationary Altitude: Results from Long Term Breakup Simulation. Acta Astronautica, 34: 33–41, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Yasaka and N. Ishii. Breakup in Geostationary Orbit: A Possible Creation of a Debris Ring. Acta Astronautica, 26: 523–530, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pardini, C., Anselmo, L. The effectiveness of end-of-life re-orbiting for debris mitigation in geostationary orbit. Space Debris 1, 173–193 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012543500732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012543500732

Navigation