Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 199–220 | Cite as

How the Sublime Comes to Matter in Eighteenth Century Legal Discourse – an Irigarayan Critique of Hobbes, Locke and Burke

  • Sue Chaplin
Article
  • 120 Downloads

Abstract

This article examines the way in which the sublime comes to matter within various eighteenth century legal discourses, particularly in the work of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Edmund Burke. The essay seeks also to relate the theoretical works of these philosophers and lawyers to practical legislative developments of the period, in particular, the passage of the Black Act in1726 and the Marriage Act in 1753. The sublime comes to matter to the law in this period in the sense that philosophical conceptualizations of the sublime in terms of power and transcendence become increasingly significant to representations of the nature and function of English law. Such theoretical accounts of the law as are found in the work of Hobbes, Locke, and Burke, moreover, translate into juridical practices designed to affirm the status of the law as a transcendentally sublime source of political authority in the eighteenth century. This article subjects that understanding of the law to a feminist critique that draws upon the work of the French philosopher, Luce Irigaray. It will be shown that the sublime within Western thought is generally associated with a sense of dread as to the possibility of the annihilation of consciousness. This ontological dread entails, in Jean Francois Lyotard’s terms, a recognition of the possibility of “nothing further happening” to the subject. Within Western discourse, this dread is projected onto, or made material in the form of, some ‘other’ that is, in Irigaray’s estimation, most usually feminine. Thus, the sublime comes to matter in this second, ontological sense and it is within this context that the transcendental sublime emerges as a response to a sense of dread that is projected on to some material, feminine, or feminised, ‘other’. In eighteenth century legal discourse, this ‘other’ take the form of the ‘state of nature’, or the revolutionary mob, or the revolutionary female who signifies more than anything a return to animality and chaos –an ontological and political fall from grace. The Black Act and the Marriage Act, with their shared emphasis upon the preservation of political stability and patriarchal property rights, may in this context be regarded as manifestations in the legal domain of the metaphysical principles of the transcendental sublime – with its emphasis upon an escape from, and a control of, the dreadful, feminine ‘other’.

dread feminine nature revolution sublime transcendence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allen, R.T., “The State and Civil Society as Objects of Aesthetic Appreciation”, British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (1976), 235-247.Google Scholar
  2. Ashfield, A. &de Bolla, P., The Sublime: A Reader in Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  3. Blakemore, S., Burke and the fall of Language: The French Revolution as Linguistic Event (Hanover: University Press of New England, 1988).Google Scholar
  4. Bruyn, F. de, The Literary Genres of Edmund Burke: The Political Uses of Literary Form (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  5. Burke, E., A Philosophical Enquiry into the Orig in of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful, ed. James T. Boulton (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990a).Google Scholar
  6. Burke, E., A Letter to the Nation Assembly (Oxford: Woodstock, 1990b).Google Scholar
  7. Burke, E., Reflections on the Revolution in France (London: Penguin 1985).Google Scholar
  8. Burke, E., “Letter on a Regicide Peace”, in TheWorks of Edmund Burke, Vol. V (Michigan: Scholarly Press, 1965a), 225-226.Google Scholar
  9. Burke, E., “Letter to a Noble Lord”, in Works (Michigan: Scholarly Press, 1965b), 186-188.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, E., Speech on a Bill for the Repeal of the Marriage Act, in Works (Michigan: Scholarly Press, 1965c), 134-136.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish (London: Penguin, 1997).Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S., Introductory Lectures on Psychanalysis (London: Penguin, 1974).Google Scholar
  13. Fromm, E., The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (London: Random House, 1997).Google Scholar
  14. Furniss, T., Edmund Burke' Aesthetic Ideology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  15. Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-Identity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar
  16. Gonda, C., Reading Daughters' Fictions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  17. Hay, D., “Property, Authority and the Criminal Law”, in Albion' Fatal Tree, ed. D. Hay (London: Penguin, 1975), 25-37.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M., “What is Metaphysics?” in Basic Writings, ed. D. Farrell (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), 90-97.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, B., Eighteenth-Century Women: An Anthology (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984).Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes, T., Leviathan (London: Penguin, 1986).Google Scholar
  21. Huhn, T., “The Kantian Sublime and the Nostalgia for Violence”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53/3 (1995), 268-279.Google Scholar
  22. Irigaray, L., “Body Against Body: In Relation to the Mother”, in Sexes and Genealogies, edited and translated by Gillian C. Gill (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), 1-17.Google Scholar
  23. Irigaray, L., Speculum of the Other Woman (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  24. Kierkegaard, S., The Concept of Dread (London: Macmillan, 1944).Google Scholar
  25. Kristeva, J., The Powers of Horror (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  26. Lacoue-Labarthe, P., “Sublime Truth”, Cultural Critique, winter 2 (1992), 207-228.Google Scholar
  27. Locke, J., Second Treatise of Government, ed. D. Wootton (London: Penguin, 1993a).Google Scholar
  28. Locke, J., First Treatise on Government, ed. D. Wootton (London: Penguin, 1993b).Google Scholar
  29. Lyotard, J-F., “The Sublime and the Avant-Garde”, in The Lyotard Reader, ed. A. Benjamin (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989), 196-211.Google Scholar
  30. Sharpe, J.A., Crime in Early Modern England, 1550-1750 (London: Longman, 1984).Google Scholar
  31. Sircello, G., “How is a Theory of the Sublime Possible?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51/4 (1993), 541-549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson, E.P., Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Acts (London: Penguin, 1992).Google Scholar
  33. Trumbach, R., The Marriage Act of 1753: Four Tracts (London: Garland, 1984).Google Scholar
  34. West, R., “Jurisprudence and Gender”, University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988), 1-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zizek, S., The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sue Chaplin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HuddersfieldStretford, ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations