Abstract
In correspondence with terror management theory, the findings of two experiments show that reminders of death lead to stronger effects of perceived fairness on ratings of negative affect. Furthermore, in line with the theory's self-esteem mechanism, results of Experiment 1 suggest that state self-esteem may mediate this relationship between mortality salience and fairness. In further correspondence with the self-esteem mechanism, findings of Experiment 2 reveal that introducing an activity (after reminders of death and before the fairness manipulation) with which people can reaffirm positive conceptions of themselves leads people to react less strongly to variations in fairness than not introducing such a self-affirmation activity. These findings suggest that people react especially strongly to perceived fairness when they are in need for a boost in their self-esteem. Implications for the psychology of fairness are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 267–299.
Arndt, J., and Greenberg, J. (1999). The effects of a self-esteem boost and mortality salience on responses to boost relevant and irrelevant worldview threats. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 1331–1341.
Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., and Schimel, J. (1999). Creativity and terror management: Evidence that creative activity increases guilt and social projection following mortality salience. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77: 19–32.
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1173–1182.
Ben-Ari, O. T., Florian, V., and Mikulincer, M. (1999). The impact of mortality salience on reckless driving: A test of terror management mechanisms. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76: 35–45.
Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., Reed, T., and Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75: 394–407.
Brockner, J., and Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychol. Bull. 120: 189–208.
Folger, R. (1984). Preface. In Folger, R. (ed.), The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives, Plenum, New York, pp. ix-x.
Folger, R., and Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., and Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 2253–2261.
Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (ed.), Basic Group Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 235–256.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., and Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58: 308–318.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., and Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 29, pp. 61–139.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Rosenblatt, A., Burling, J., Lyon, D., Simon, L., and Pinel, E. (1992). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63: 913–922.
Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social congnition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102: 4–27.
Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., and McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduces mortality threats. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 24–36.
Heatherton, T. F., and Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60: 895–910.
Koole, S. L., Dechesne, M., and Van Knippenberg, A. (2000). The Sting of Death: Evidence That Reminders of Mortality Undermine Implicit Self-Esteem. Unpublished manuscript.
Koper, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 23: 313–325.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum, New York.
Liu, T. J., and Steele, C. M. (1986). Attributional analysis of self-affirmation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 531–540.
McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., and Pyszczynski, T. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview-threatening others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 590–605.
Pyszczynski, T. A., Greenberg, J., and Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughs: An extension of terror management theory. Psychol. Rev. 106: 835–845.
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., and Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 681–690.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., and Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 24, pp. 93–159.
Steele, C. M., and Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 5–19.
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, Vol. 25, pp. 115–191.
Tyler, T. R., and Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, Vol. 4, pp. 595–629.
Van den Bos, K. (1999). What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 560–577.
Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80: 931–941.
Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997a). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others?: The psychology of the fair process effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 1034–1046.
Van den Bos, K., and Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79: 355–366.
Van den Bos, K., and Spruijt, N. (in press). Appropriateness of Decisions as a Moderator of the Voice Effect. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.
Van den Bos, K., and Van Prooijen, J.-W. (in press). Referent cognitions theory: The role of closeness of reference points in the psychology of voice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997b). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 95–104.
Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., and Lind, E. A. (1998a). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75: 1449–1458.
Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., and Vermunt, R. (1998b). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74: 1493–1503.
Vermunt, R., Van Knippenberg, D., and Van Knippenberg, B., and Blaauw, E. (2001). Self-esteem and outcome fairness judgments: Differential use of procedural and outcome information. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:621–628.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., and Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 1063–1070.
Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., and Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. J. Appl. Psychol. 84: 786–794.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Brockner, J., and Martin, C. (1999). A self-affirmation analysis of survivor's reactions to unfair organizational downsizings. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 441–460.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van den Bos, K. Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Impact of Mortality Salience and Self-Esteem on Ratings of Negative Affect. Social Justice Research 14, 1–23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012501506803
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012501506803