Abstract
It is widely recognised that studies based ontime diaries form the most valid and reliabledata source concerning peoples' timeallocation, but it is also documented thatvarious designs give somewhat divergentresults. Usually both main activities andpossible parallel activities are captured intime diaries. Much research has been undertakento evaluate various aspects of the design ofsuch surveys, but there has been littlesystematic investigation on the possibleeffects of recording parallel activities on theway people report their main activities. Asmost analyses focus mainly on primaryactivities, validity in this area is of utmostimportance. Utilising the Norwegian Time UseStudy from 1990–1991 we discuss in this paper if,and possibly how, the registration of secondaryactivities influences the picture we get ofpeople's main activities. Also the role of theexamples presented to participants isinspected. Our findings indicate that therecording of parallel activities does affectthe way people report their main activities.Especially indistinct and fuzzy activities likechildcare, socialising and television viewingseem to be sensitive, but effects differ forwomen and men. Undoubtedly, information onsecondary activities is needed in order tofully reflect people's time patterns, but it isimportant that guidelines for diary keeping andexamples presented to participants aredeveloped carefully so that information onprimary activities is not distorted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Blekesaune, M.: 2000, Familiefase og hverdagsliv. En studie av husholdsarbeid og fritid. NOVA-rapport 2000/10.
Duvold, E.-M.: 1994, Bare barn er barn, men menn er menn. Småbarnsforeldres disponering av tid til barna. INAS-NOTAT, Vol. 12 (Institutt for sosialforskning, Oslo).
Gershuny, J. and O. Sullivan: 1998, 'The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis', European Sociological Review 14(1), pp. 69–85.
Haraldsen, G. and H. Kitterød: 1992, Døgnet rundt. Tidsbruk og tidsorganisering 1970–1990. Tidsnyttingsundersøkelsene. SØS 76.
Harvey, A. S.: 1990, Guidelines for Time Use data Collection. Prepared for International Association for Time Use Research.
Hedges, B. M.: 1972, 'Time budgets', Social Trends (5), pp. 35–44.
Juster, F. T. and F. P. Stafford: 1991, 'The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement', Journal of Economic Literature (June) XXIX, pp. 471–522.
Kalfs, N. and W. Saris: 1998, 'Large differences in time use for three data collection systems', Social Indicators Research 44, pp. 267–290.
Kitterød, R. H. and S. Opdahl: 1992, 'Småbarnsforeldre: Lange dager, men tid til barna', Samfunnsspeilet 6(2), pp. 2–9.
Kitterød, R. H.: 1992, 'Småbarnsforeldre: Mye sammen med barna, men mer foreldreskift enn før', Samfunnsspeilet 6(3), pp. 5–11.
Kitterød, R. H. and Aa. Lømo: 1996, 'Småbarnsforeldres tidsbruk 1970–1990', in B. Brandth and K. Moxnes (eds.), Familien i tiden (Tano, Oslo).
Lømo, Aa.: 1999, Jo mer vi er sammen... Samværsmønster i familier med småbarn og i familier med tenåringsbarn 1980–1990. Rapport 8/99 (Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring, Oslo).
Lingsom, S.: 1978, 'Kommentar. Prøveundersøkelse om tid brukt til omsorgsaktiviteter', Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 19, pp. 548–556.
Lingsom, S.: 1979, Advantages and Disadvantages of Alternative Time Diary Techniques: A Working Paper. Statistisk sentralbyrå, Interne notater 79/4.
Lingsom, S.: 1980, Dagbøker med og uten faste tidsintervaller: Prøveundersøkelse om tidsnytting 1979. Statistisk sentralbyrå, Rapporter 80/18.
Marini, M. M. and B. A. Shelton: 1993, 'Measuring household work: Recent experience in the United States', Social Science Research 22, pp. 361–382.
Niemi, I.: 1993, 'Systematic error in behavioral measurement: Comparing results from interview and time budget studies', Social Indicators Research 30(2–3), pp. 229–244.
Press, J. E. and E. Townsley: 1998, 'Wives' and husbands' housework reporting. Gender, class, and social desirability', Gender and Society (April) 12(2), pp. 188–218.
Robinson, J. P.: 1985, 'The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures', in F. T. Juster and F. P. Stafford (eds.), Time, Goods and Well-Being (The University of Michigan).
Robinson, J. P. and G. Godbey: 1997, Time for Life. The SurprisingWays Americans Use Their Time (The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania).
Rydenstam, K.: 1992, I tid och otid. En undersökning om kvinners og menns tidsanvänding 1990/91. Statistiska Centralbyrån, rapport no. 79.
Rydenstam, K. and A. Wadeskog: 1998, Evaluation of the European Time use Pilot Studies. Task Force “Time Use Surveys”, 16–17 November. Eurostat DOC E2/TUS/5/98.
Scheuch, E. K.: 1972, 'The time-budget interview', in A. Szalai (ed.), The Use of Time: Daily Activity of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries (European Co-ordination Centre, The Hague).
Statistics Norway: 1975, The Time Budget Survey 1971–1972, Vol 1. Norwegian Official Statistics A 692.
Statistics Norway: 1983, The Time Budget Survey 1980–1981. Norwegian Official Statistics B 378.
Statistics Norway: 1992, The Time Budget Surveys 1970–1990. Norwegian Official Statistics C 10.
Szalai, A.: 1972, The Use of Time: Daily Activity of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries (European Coordination Centre, The Hague).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kitterød, R.H. Does the recording of parallel activities in Time Use Diaries affect the way people report their main activities?. Social Indicators Research 56, 145–178 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012289811886
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012289811886