Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Drinkers' and Nondrinkers' Responses to Health-Related Information Presented on Wine Beverage Labels

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) recently approved two statements that can now be presented on wine bottles to inform consumers about the potential positive health effects of wine consumption. This study examined effects related to the inclusion of a health claim related statement in abetween-subjects experiment involving drinkers and nondrinkers' exposure to manipulated wine labels. The results indicate that consumer attitudes towards the wine product and perceptions of the long-term health effects of wine consumption were influenced by the interaction between the presence of a government warning statement, the availability of a health-effects claim, and drinking status. The implications of these findings for marketers and public policy makers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. C., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1996). Alcohol warning label effects: Socialization, addiction, and public policy issues. In: R. P. Hill (Ed.), Marketing and consumer research in the public interest, pp. 153–175. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. C. (1995). The effectiveness of alcohol warning labels: A review and extension. American Behavioral Scientist, 38, 622–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., & Durvasula, S. (1991). Effects of consumption frequency on believability and attitudes toward alcohol warning labels. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25, 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, T. (1999). Senator proposing to triple wine tax. Wine Today, February23, retrieved from http://www.winetoday.com.

  • Barton, J., Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Social image factors as motivators of smoking initiation in early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1499–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensley, L. S., & Wu, R. (1991). The role of psychological reactance in drinking following alcohol prevention messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1111–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. (1995). National television violence study executive summary 1994–1995. Ventura, CA: Mediascope Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in lowmotivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S., Lockshin, L., & Unwin, T. (1999). Consumer responses to wine back bottle labels. Journal of Wine Research, 10, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietary Guidelines for Americans (1996). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.

  • Eigen, L. D., Kellerman, K., Dejong, W., & Hairston, B. (1998). The effects of wine labels on public perception. Washington D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Pub. PHD 752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R., & Hanson, D. J. (1989). Reactance theory: A test of collegiate drinking. Psychological Reports, 64, 1083–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K. L. (1993). An evaluation of the alcohol warning label: A comparison of the United States and Ontario, Canada in 1990 and 1991. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, M., & Birrell, J. (1979). Government health warnings and the “boomerang” effect. Psychological Reports, 44, 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Crowley, E. D. (1991). Adolescent substance abuse and leisure boredom. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalsher, M. J., Clarke, S. W., & Wogalter, M. S. (1993). Communication of alcohol facts and hazards by a warning poster. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh, P. (1998). Speech to the 1998 Annual Impact Marketing Conference. Impact, Vol. 28:20, April 15 and May 1.

  • Kazman, S. (1999). Here's to honesty in liquor labels. Wall Street Journal, February 18, p. A22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, I. (1999). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Branding and packaging can make or break a wine sale. The Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal, 14(6), 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Boyce, W., & King, M. (1999). Trends in the health of Canadian youth. Ottawa: Health Canada. Catalogue No. H39–498/1999, E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. (1997). After the preaching: The lure of the taboo. New York Times, August 24, p. 31.

  • Klein, R. (1993). Cigarettes are sublime. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, R., & Steiner, G. (1961). A model for predictive measurement of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25(3), 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massing, M. (1999). Wines unfortunate new labels. New York Times. February 9, retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.

  • Mayer, C. (1999). Message on the bottle: New label's nod to health. Washington Post, February 6, p. E01.

  • Mazis, M. B., Morris, L. A., & Swasy, J. L. (1991). An evaluation of the alcohol warning label: Initial survey results. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T. (1999). Winemakers toast labels, tackle logistics. The Modesto Bee, February 8, 1999, retrieved from http://www2.modbee.com/pagearc/a30140.htm.

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, C., & Shih, C.-F. (1999). Smoking scenes in movies and antismoking advertisements before movies: Effects on youth. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, B., Levy, A. S., & Derby, B. M. (1999). The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: Results from FDA experimental data. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, D. L., Mayer, R. N., & Smith, K. R. (1991). Alcohol warnings: How do you know when you have had one too many? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10, 214–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M., & Biggers, T. (1987). Emotion-eliciting qualities in the motion picture viewing situation and audience evaluation. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law, 3, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgement: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G. (1998). The concept of target risk and its implications for accident prevention strategies. In: A. M. Feyer & A. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational injury: Risk, prevention and intervention, pp. 82–105. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine Institute (1999), retrieved from http://www.wineinstitute.org/newstuff.

  • Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, 32(3), 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kozup, J., Burton, S. & Creyer, E. A Comparison of Drinkers' and Nondrinkers' Responses to Health-Related Information Presented on Wine Beverage Labels. Journal of Consumer Policy 24, 209–230 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012277421936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012277421936

Keywords

Navigation