Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurements on the Arm and Calf During Cesarean Delivery

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. Shivering may occur in 75% of women undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery and may render an automated noninvasive blood pressure (ANIBP) device incapable of determining blood pressure (BP). When patients shiver under spinal anesthesia, the lower extremities do not exhibit the same involuntary muscle movements as do the upper extremities. This study was undertaken to determine if a correlation exists between ANIBP measurements in the arm and calf of women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Methods. We enrolled 73 women in this blinded, prospective study. Simultaneous arm and calf BP were measured with an ANIBP and differences between the two were determined. Results. We found significant differences between the average difference in systolic and in diastolic BP, no significant difference between the average mean BP, and a tendency for the systolic BP to be higher and the diastolic BP to be lower in the calf than in the arm; however, there was a large degree of variability among patients. Conclusion. We conclude that there is a poor correlation between the BP measured by an ANIBP on the calf and one on the arm. In the parturient undergoing cesarean section, lower extremity BP as measured by an ANIBP does not correlate with the arm ANIBP and should not be used to assure fetal wellbeing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Shnider SM, deLorimier AA, Holl JW, Chaper FK, Morishima HO. Vasopressors in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 102: 911–919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zilanti M, Salazar JR, Aller J, Aguero O. Fetal heart rate and pH of fetal Capillary blood during epidural analgesia in labor. Obstet and Gynecol 1970; 36: 881–886

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moya F, Smith B. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: Clinical and biochemical studies of effects on maternal physiology. JAMA 1962; 179: 609–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greiss FC, Crandell DL. Therapy for hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia during pregnancy. JAMA 1965; 191: 89–92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brizgys RV, Daily PA, Shnider SM, Kotelko DM, Levinson G. The incidence and neonatal effects of maternal hypotension during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 782–786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark RB, Thompson DS, Thompson CH. Prevention of spinal hypotension with cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1976; 45: 670–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Webb PJ, James FM, Wheeler AS. Shivering during epidural analgesia in women in labor. Anesthesiology 1981; 55: 706–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramsey M. Automatic oscillometric NIBP versus manual auscultatory blood pressure in the PACU. J Clin Monit Comput 1994; 10: 136–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paulus DA. Noninvasive blood pressure measurement. Med Instrum 1981; 15: 91–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maier WR. Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring. In: Blitt CD, ed. Monitoring in Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine 2nd edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 84

    Google Scholar 

  11. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986; 8476: 307–310

    Google Scholar 

  12. Functional Descriptions of M1046-93016. In: HP Component Monitoring System Service Manual. Vol I, edition 5, section 8, 1996: 1–7

  13. Van Bergen FH, Weatherhead DS, Treloar AE, Dobkin AB, Buckley JJ. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of measuring arterial blood pressure. Circulation 1954; 10: 481–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramsey M. Noninvasive automatic determination of mean arterial pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979; 17: 11–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milsom I, Svahn SO, Forssman L, Sivertsson R. An evaluation of automated indirect blood pressure measurement during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 721–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Park MK, Lee DH, Johnson GA. Oscillometric blood pressures in the arm, thigh, and calf in healthy children and those with aortic coarctation. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 761–765

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Block FE, Schulte GT. Ankle blood pressure measurement, an acceptable alternative to arm measurement. Int Clin Monit Comput 1996; 13: 167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hui YL, Wu YW. The blood pressure of upper and lower extremities in parturients under spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1995; 33: 119–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berne RM, Levy MN, The Arterial System. In: Berne RM, Levy MN, eds. Physiology, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993: 462–463

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bieniarz J, Maqueda E, Caldeyro-Barcia R. Compression of aorta by the uterus in late human pregnancy. I. Variations between femoral and brachial artery pressure with changes from hypertension to hypotension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 95: 795–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckstein KL, Marx GF. Aortocaval compression and uterine displacement. Anesthesiology 1974; 40: 92–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hon EH, Reid BL, Hehre FW. The electronic evaluation of fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960; 79: 209–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Norris MC. Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. In: Norris MC, ed. Obstetric Anesthesia, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 1999: 415–439

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shnider SM, Levinson G. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. In: Shnider SM, Levinson G, eds. Anesthesia for Obstetrics, 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams Wilkins, 1993: 211–245

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reisner LS, Lin D. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. In: Chestnut DH, ed. Obstetric Ansesthesia: Principles and Practice. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994: 459–486

    Google Scholar 

  26. Corke BC, Datta SJ, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB, Alper MH. Spinal anesthesia for caesarean section: The influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome. Anaesthesia 1982; 37: 658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ebner H, Barcohana J, Bartoshuk AK. Influence of postspinal hypotension on the fetal electrocardiogram. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960; 80: 569–572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahn, J., Bernstein, H., Hossain, S. et al. Comparison of Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurements on the Arm and Calf During Cesarean Delivery. J Clin Monit Comput 16, 557–562 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012267312308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012267312308

Navigation