Skip to main content
Log in

Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of C60 Derivative Sol-Gels

  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optical limiting properties of a sol-gel, functionalized with C60 derivative molecule were studied by the nonlinear transmission technique in 480–650 nm wavelength range with nanosecond pulsed laser. The solid plates, with functionalized derivative C60 concentration equal to 0.004 ML−1, show interesting limiting behavior with threshold around 0.01 J/cm2. The damage threshold ranges between 0.1 and 10 J/cm2 depending upon the sample optical quality. The nonlinear optical properties of sol-gels were determined also by the optical third harmonic generation. At 1907 nm the cubic χ(3) (−3 ω; ω, ω, ω) susceptibility is of 1.3(± 0.1) × 10−14 esu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.J. Blau, H.J. Byrne, D.J. Cardin, T.J. Dennis, J.P. Hare, H.W. Kroto, R. Taylor, and D.R.M. Walton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1423 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Hoshi, N. Nakamura, Y. Maruyama, T. Nakagawa, S. Suzuki, H. Shiromaru, and Y. Achiba, Japan J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 30, L1397 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Q. Gong, Y. Sun, Z. Xia, Y.H. Zou, Z. Gu, X. Zhou, and D. Qiang, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 3025 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Meth, H. Vanherzeleele, and Y. Wang, Chem. Phys. Lett. 197, 26 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z.H. Kafafi, F.J. Bartoli, J.R. Lindle, and R.G.S. Pong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2705 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. G.P. Talpatra, N. Manickam, M. Samoc, M.E. Orczyk, S.P. Karna, and P.N. Prasad, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 5206 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Neher, G.I. Stegeman, F.A. Tinker, and N. Peyghambarian, Opt. Lett. 17, 1491(1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Kajzar, C. Taliani, S. Rossini, R. Danieli, and R. Zamboni, Chem. Phys. Lett. 217, 418 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Brusatin, M. Guglielmi, P. Innocenzi, R. Bozio, R. Signorini, M. Meneghetti, M. Maggini, G. Scorrano, and M. Prato, SPIE 3803, 90 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Signorini, A. Tonellato, M. Meneghetti, R. Bozio, M. Prato, M. Maggini, G. Scorrano, G. Brusatin, P. Innocenzi, and M. Guglielmi, Proceedings of International Symposium on Optical Power Limiting ISOPL 2000, Venice, July 2–5, 2000, Nonl. Optics.

  11. R. Signorini, M. Meneghetti, R. Bozio, M. Maggini, G. Scorrano, M. Prato, G. Brusatin, P. Innocenzi, and M. Guglielmi, Carbon 38, 1653 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Signorini, M. Meneghetti, R. Bozio, M. Maggini, G. Scorrano, M. Prato, G. Brusatin, P. Innocenzi, and M. Guglielmi, in Multiphoton and Light Driven Multielectron Processes in Organics: New Phenomena, Materials and Applications, edited by F. Kajzar and V.M. Agranovich (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 2000), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Sutherland, R. Pachter, P. Hood, D. Hagan, K. Lewis and J. Perry (eds.), in Materials for Optical Limiting II, Proc. MRS, Pittsburgh (1997) vol. 479.

  14. F. Kajzar (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Optical Power Limiting, Nonl. Optics 21, (1999).

  15. C.W. Lawson (ed.), Nonlinear Optical Liquids and Power Limiters, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3146 (1997), 3472 (1998) and 3798 (1999).

  16. R. Bozio and F. Kajzar (eds.), Proceedings of International Symposium on Optical Power Limiting ISOPL 2000, Venice, July 2–5, 2000, Nonl. Optics, in press.

  17. L.W. Tutt and T.F. Boggess, Prog. Quant. Electr 17, 299 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.W. Perry, in Nonlinear Optics of Organic Molecules and Polymers, edited by H.S. Nalwa and S. Miyata (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997), Chap. 13, p. 813.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.W. Van Stryland, M.J. Soileau, S. Ross, and D.J. Hagan, Nonl. Optics 21, 38 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.N. Prasad, G.S. He, M.P. Joshi, J. Swiatkiewicz, G. Manchala, M. Lal, A. Biswas, and K.-S. Kim, Nonl. Opt. 21, 39 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L.W. Tutt and A. Kost, Nature 356, 225 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.G. Mc Lean, R.L. Sutherland, M.C. Brant, D.M. Brandelik, P.A. Fleitz, and T. Pottenger, Opt. Lett. 18, 858 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Kajzar and J. Messier, Phys. Rev. A 32, 2352 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Kajzar, J. Messier, and C. Rosilio, J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3040 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.-C. Le Duff, Thesis, Orsay University, 2000.

  26. G. Brusatin, private communication.

  27. B. Buchalter and G.R. Meredith, Appl. Optics 21, 3221 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chollet, P., Kajzar, F. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of C60 Derivative Sol-Gels. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 22, 255–265 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012204220837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012204220837

Navigation