Abstract
Turkmenistan's economic performance during the first decade after independence is interesting because it is an extreme case, regularly ranking last among all the former centrally planned economies by transition indicators measuring speed of reform or degree of economic liberalization. This paper analyses the evolution of the economic system and Turkmenistan's economic development since 1991. The country's abundant resource endowment provided favourable initial conditions for pursuing an agenda that gave a low priority to economic reform, while emphasizing the country's neutrality and minimizing internal political change. Nevertheless, in 1997 the unreformed economy suffered a deep decline and, although it has enjoyed some recovery since 1999, the overall performance of GDP since independence is one of the worst among all transition economies. Although the government had achieved its external and internal political goals, the economic strategy appeared to be unsustainable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, K. and Pomfret, R.: 1997, “Turkmenistan: Non-reform in a Resource-rich Economy”, Appendix to Working Paper No. 135, United Nations World Institute for Development Economics Research (UN/WIDER), Helsinki, June, 36-8.
Freitag-Wirminghaus, R.: 1998, “Turkmenistan's Place in Central Asia and the World”, in Touraj Atabaki and John O'Kane (eds.) Post-Soviet Central Asia (Tauris Academic Studies, London), 157-76.
Klugman, J.: 1999, Financing and Governance of Education in Central Asia, MOCT-MOST Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, 9(4), 423-42.
Lubin, N.: 1999, Energy Wealth, Development and Stability in Turkmenistan, NBR Analysis, 10(3), August, p.61-78 (National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle WA).
Mercer-Blackman, V. and Unigovskaya, A.: 2000, “Compliance with IMF Program Indicators and Growth in Transition Economies”, IMF Working Paper WP/00/47, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.
Milanovic, B.: 1998, Income, Inequality, and Poverty during the Transition from Planned to Market Economy. The World Bank, Washington DC.
Ochs, M.: “Turkmenistan (1997): The Quest for Stability and Control” in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott (eds.) Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK), 312-59.
O'Hara, S. and Hannan,T.: 1999, Irrigation and Water Management in Turkmenistan: Past Systems, Present Problems and Future Scenarios, Europe-Asia Studies, 51(1), 21-41.
Pastor, G. and Rooden, R. van: 2000, “Turkmenistan - The Burden of Current Agricultural Policies”, IMF Working Paper WP/00/98, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, June.
Pomfret, R.: 1995, The Economies of Central Asia. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Pomfret, R.: 1999a, “Living Standards in Central Asia”, MOCT-MOST Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, 9(4), 395-421.
Pomfret, R.: 1999b, Central Asia turns South? Trade Relations in Transition. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, and the Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
Sagers, M.: 1999, Turkmenistan's Gas Trade: The Case of Exports to Ukraine, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 40(2), 142-9.
Tarr, D.: 1994, How moving to World Prices affects the Terms of Trade of 15 Countries of the Former Soviet Union, Journal of Comparative Economics, 18(1), 1-24.
Werner, M.: 2001, Im Reich des grossen Führers: Turkmenistan - eine zentralasiatische Despotie, Osteuropa, 51(2), 127-34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pomfret, R. Turkmenistan: From Communism to Nationalism by Gradual Economic Reform. MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies 11, 165–176 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012202313876
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012202313876