Skip to main content
Log in

The Determinants of Physician Attitudes and Subjective Norms Toward Drug Information Sources: Modification and Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To improve upon the theory of reasoned action and apply it to pharmaceutical research, we investigated the effects of relevant appraisals, attributes, and past behavior of physicians on the use of drug information sources. We also examined the moderating effects of practice characteristics.

Methods. A mail questionnaire asked HMO physicians to evaluate seven common sources of drug information on general appraisals (degree of usefulness and ease of use), specific attributes (availability, quality of information on harmful effects and on drug efficacy), and past behavior when searching for information on a new, simulated H2 antagonist agent. Semantic differential scales were used to measure each appraisal, attribute and past behavior. Information was also collected on practice characteristics.

Results. Findings from 108/200 respondents indicated that appraisals and attributes were useful determinants of attitudes and subjective norms toward use. Degree of usefulness and quality of information on harmful effects were important predictors of attitudes toward use for several sources of information. Ease of use and degree of usefulness were important predictors of subjective norms toward use. In many cases, moderating effects of practice characteristics were in opposing directions. Past behavior had significant direct effects on attitudes toward the PDR.

Conclusions. The findings suggest ways to improve the usefulness of the theory of reasoned action as a model of decision-making. We also propose practical guidelines that can be used to improve the types of drug information sources used by physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. H. Sheppard, J. Hartwick, and P. R. Warshaw. J Consumer Research 15:325-343 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. P. Bagozzi. J Marketing Research 19:562-583 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. P. Bagozzi. International J Research Marketing 1:295-309 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. G. Evans. Am Psychologist 46:6-15 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. A. Osiobe. Soc Sci Med 21:965-973 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Abate, A. I. Jacknowitz, and J. M. Shumway. Drug Inform J 23:309-319 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. J. C. Boerkamp, F. M. Haaijer-Ruskamp, J. C. Reuyl, and A. Versluis. Soc Sci Med 42:379-388 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. P. D. Stolley, M. H. Becker, L. Lasagna, et al. Med Care 10:17-28 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. H. Becker, P. D. Stolley, L. Lasagna, et al. Inquiry 9:30-42 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Y. Peay and E. R. Peay. Soc Sci Med 18:1019-1025 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. M. G. Ziegler, P. Lew, and B. C. Singer. JAMA 273:1295-1296 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. A. Gaither, R. P. Bagozzi, F. J. Ascione, and D. M. Kirking. Pharmaceutical Research 13:1291-1298 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of innovations: third edition Free Press, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. Management Science 35:982-1003 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. P. Bagozzi, F. D. Davis, and P. R. Warshaw. Human Relations 45:659-686 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Chinburapa, L. N. Larson, M. Brocks, et al. Soc Sci Med 36:1473-1482 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. C. A. Gaither, R. P. Bagozzi, D. M. Kirking, and F. J. Ascione.-Drug Inform J 28:817-827 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Johnston. Econometric methods. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. H. Smith, D. L. Sorby, and L. J. Sharp. Am J Hosp Pharm 32:19-25 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. A. G. Lipman, J. K. Devenport, and B. C. Page. Am J Hosp Pharm 39:71-73 (1982).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaither, C.A., Bagozzi, R.P., Ascione, F.J. et al. The Determinants of Physician Attitudes and Subjective Norms Toward Drug Information Sources: Modification and Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action. Pharm Res 14, 1298–1308 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012143915886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012143915886

Navigation