Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on Agents with Mixed NO-Dependent Vasodilating and β-Blocking Activities

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. A series of derivatives having a propranolol-like moiety linked to NO-donor furoxan substructures were synthesized. The main objective of this investigation was to obtain agents with mixed NO-dependent vasodilating and β-blocking activities.

Methods. Most of the target compounds were synthesized from the appropriate furoxans bearing XCH2CH2NH2 (X = O, S, SO2) chains at the 4 position of the ring, using A1(C2H5)3 in methylene chloride solution and (±)2,3-epoxypropyl 1-naphtyl ether. Two of the final products (X = CONH) were obtained by coupling the appropriate furoxancarboxylic acids with N-[2-hydroxy-3-(l-naphthoxy)propyl]-ethylenediamine. β1- and β2-blocking activities were examined on isolated guinea pig right atria and on guinea pig trachea respectively. Vasodilating properties were assessed on endothelium denuded strips of rat aorta.

Results. Some derivatives behave as well balanced 'hybrids' displaying NO-dependent vasodilating and β-blocking properties in the same concentration range. Some others display either prevalent β-blocking or vasodilating activity. Generally speaking hybrid formation lowers the affinity for β-receptors, in particular for β2-type, to give an increase in β12 selectivity.

Conclusions. The furoxan system is a flexible tool in designing analogues of propranolol whose NO-donating and β-blocking properties are modulated over a wide range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. B. J. R. Nicolaus. Symbiotic Approach to Drug Design. In Decision Making in Drug Research; Gross, F. Ed.; Raven Press: New York, 1983; pp 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. a)P. A. Van Zwieten. J. Hypertens. 8:687–696 (1990); b) P. A. Van Zwieten. Drugs. 45:509–517 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. M. Christiaans and H. Timmerman. Eur. J. Phar. Sci. 4:1–22 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. F. Kerwin, Jr., J. R. Lancaster, Jr., and P. L. Feldman. J. Med. Chem. 38:4343–4362 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gasco, R. Fruttero, and G. Sorba. Il Farmaco 51:617–635 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Ghigo, R. Heller, R. Calvino, P. Alessio, R. Fruttero, A. Gasco, A. Bosia, and G. Pescarmona. Biochem. Pharmacol. 43:1281–1288 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Feelish, K. Schönafinger, and E. Noack. Biochem. Pharmacol. 44:1149–1157 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Ferioli, G. C. Folco, C. Ferretti, A. M. Gasco, C. Medana, R. Fruttero, M. Civelli, and A. Gasco. Br. J. Pharmacol. 114:816–820 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Di Stilo, C. Cena, A. M. Gasco, A. Gasco, D. Ghigo, and A. Bosia. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 6:2607–2612 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hecker, W. Vorhoff, A. T. Bara, P. I. Mordvintcev, and R. Busse. Nauny-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 351:426–432 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Medana, G. Ermondi, R. Fruttero, A. Di Stilo, C. Ferretti, and A. Gasco. J. Med. Chem. 37:4412–4416 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Sorba, C. Medana, R. Fruttero, C. Cena, A. Di Stilo, U. Galli, and A. Gasco. J. Med. Chem. 40:463–469 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Bohn, J. Brendel, P. A. Martorana, and K. Schönafinger. Br. J. Pharmacol. 114:1605–1612 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Fruttero, D. Boschi, A. Di Stilo and A. Gasco. J. Med. Chem. 38:4944–4949 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. G. Main, β-Adrenergic Receptors. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry. Hansch, C. Ed; Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1990. Vol 3, pp 188–228.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Sorba, G. Ermondi, R. Fruttero, U. Galli and A. Gasco. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 33:327–334 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Calvino, V. Mortarini, A. Gasco, A. Sanfilippo, and M. L. Ricciardi. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 15:485–487 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Grundman, G. W. Nickel, and R. K. Bansal. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1029–1050 (1975).

  19. E. R. Marle. J. Chem. Soc. 101:305–317 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. M. Gasco, R. Fruttero, G. Sorba, and A. Gasco. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1211–1213 (1991).

  21. D. Atlas, M. L. Steer, and A. Levitzki. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73:1921–1925 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. P. Krapto and C. S. Kuell. Synth. Comm. 20:2559–2564 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. E. Overman and L. A. Flippin. Tetrahedron Lett. 22:195–198 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. R. Lancaster, Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:8137–8141 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Gasco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boschi, D., Di Stilo, A., Cena, C. et al. Studies on Agents with Mixed NO-Dependent Vasodilating and β-Blocking Activities. Pharm Res 14, 1750–1758 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012136030849

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012136030849

Navigation