REFERENCES
L. Endrenyi and L. Tothfalusi. Secondary Metrics. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:401–402 (1997).
T. N. Tozer, F. Y. Bois, W. W. Hauck, M.-L. Chen, and R. L. Williams. Absorption rate vs. exposure: which is more useful for bioequivalence testing? Pharm Res. 13:453–456 (1996).
F. Y. Bois, T. N. Tozer, W. W. Hauck, M.-L. Chen, R. Patnaik, and R. L. Williams. Bioequivalence: Performance of several measures of rate of absorption. Pharm Res. 11:966–974 (1994).
M. Elze, H. Potthast, and H.H. Blume. Metrics of absorption. Data base analysis. In Bio-International 2, bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies, H. H. Blume, and K. K. Midha, eds, Stuttgart, 1995, pp. 61–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tozer, T.N., Hauck, W.W. Cmax/AUC, A Commentary. Pharm Res 14, 967–968 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012128623213
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012128623213