Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the Complex Between the Contrast Agent lobitridol (Xenetix®) and Elastase (PPE): A Model for Hydrophobic Site Protection in Drug-Protein Interactions

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The concept of Hydrophilic Sphere Stabilization, or Hydrophobic Shielding, has been postulated in the synthesis of biocompatible contrast agents in vascular imaging. To improve the safety of these polyiodinated agents, interactions with protein hydrophobic sites in biomacromolecules should be kept as low as possible. In order to evaluate the level of interactions with proteins, we have selected the serine proteinase Elastase, in presence of Iobitridol (Xenetix®), as a model.

Methods. The complex between Iobitridol and Pancreatic Porcine Elastase was investigated by X-ray diffraction techniques, on saturated monocrystals, using the synchrotron radiation at 0.98Å.

Results. In contrast to Iohexol, which displays several interactions including one in the active site, Iobitridol is unable to interact directly with elastase. Only one partially occupied site is found in between two molecules of the crystal packing.

Conclusions. The validation of the 'hydrophobic shielding' concept, which was at the origin of the design of the Iobitridol molecule, has been proven to be an essential feature in minimizing in vivo protein interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. Eloy, C. Corot, and J. Belleville. J Clin. Mat. 7:89–197 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. M. Kopko, D. C. Smith, and B. S. Bull. Radiology 174:459–461 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. F. Meyer Jr., G. M. Cole, R. Radhakrishnan, and O. Epp. Acta Cryst. B44:26–38 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Prangé, F. Gaudey, J. Ohanessian, D. Avenel, A. Neuman, C. Corot, and D. Meyer. FEBS Lett. 357:247–250 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Li de la Sierra, E. Papamichael, C. Sakarellos, J. L. Dimicoli, and T. Prangé. J. Molecular Recognition 3:36–44 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. G. W. Leslie. 26th Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACMB Newsletter on Protein Crystallography. Warrington: SERC Daresbury Laboratory, U.K., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CCP4 Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. Acta Cryst. D50:760–763 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer Jr., M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi. J. Mol. Biol. 112:535–542 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. A. Hendrickson and J. H. Konnert. Methods of Enzymol. 155:252–270 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Ganazzoli, A. Albinati, and D. Pitré. Acta Chim. Scand. 49:433–440 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Meyer, M. L. Fouchet, M. Petta, P. A. Carrupt, P. Gaillard, and B. Testa. Pharm. Res. 12:1583–1591 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. L. Connoly. J. Appl. Cryst. 16:548–558 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. J. Hubbard, K. H. Gross, and P. Argos. Protein Eng. 7:613–626 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Zhang and J. Hermans. Proteins 24:433–438 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. H. Klapper. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 229:557–566 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Prangé, L. Pernot, N. Colloc'h, S. Longhi, W. Bourquet, R. Fourme, and M. Schiltz. Protein Struct. and Funct. (in press).

  17. B. P. Schoenborn. Nature (London) 214:1120–1122 (1967); R. F. Tilton and G. A. Petsko. Biochemistry 27:6574–6582 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Otting, E. Liepinsh, B. Halle, and U. Frey. Nature Struct. Biol. 4:396–404 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Morton and B. W. Matthews. Biochemistry 34:8576–8588 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. C. Nunes and B. P. Schoenborn. Mol. Pharmacol. 9:835–839 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. A. Feher, E. P. Baldwin, and F. W. Dahlquist. Nature Struct. Biol., 3:516–521 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. F. Tilton, I. D. Kuntz, and G. A. Petsko. Biochemistry, 23:2849–2857 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Sachsenheimer, E. F. Pai, G. E. Schultz, and R. H. Schirmer. FEBS Lett., 79:310–312 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Settle. Function of the myoglobin molecule as influenced by anesthetic molecules. Guide to Molecular Pharmacology-Toxicology. (ed. R. M. Featherstone). M. Dekker and Co, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. W. Miller. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 27:1–61 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. P. Franks and W. R. Lieb. Nature (London) 367:607–614 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. P. Schoenborn and R. M. Featherstone. Adv. Pharmacol. 5:1–17 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Volbeda, M. H. Charon, C. Piras, C. Hatchikian, M. Frey, and J. Fontecilla-Camps. Nature (London). 373:580–587 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. N. Malashkevich, R. A. Kammerer, V. Efimov, T. Schulthess, and J. Engel. Science 274:761–765 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. X. M. He and D. C. Carter. Nature (London) 358:209–215 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Corot and V. Sabattier. Action de l'Eastase sur un substrat synthétique, le N Succ(Ala)3pNA en presence de monomères iodés non ioniques. Report IHB VS 93-02, Biomatech, Châsse sur Rhône, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Schiltz, R. Fourme, I. Broutin, and T. Prangé. Structure, 3:309–316 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Prangé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prangé, T., Neuman, A., Corot, C. et al. Study of the Complex Between the Contrast Agent lobitridol (Xenetix®) and Elastase (PPE): A Model for Hydrophobic Site Protection in Drug-Protein Interactions. Pharm Res 14, 1713–1717 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012123628123

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012123628123

Navigation