Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Vehicles and Penetration Enhancers on the In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption of Methotrexate and Edatrexate Through Hairless Mouse Skin

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) is approved for the treatment of recalcitrant rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to determine the effect of vehicles and penetration enhancers on the percutaneous absorption of MTX and its analog edatrexate (EDAM), and develop transdermal (TD) delivery systems of the drugs for the treatment of RA.

Methods. From previously published pharmacokinetic parameters with low-dose MTX therapy, and considering a 50 cm2 diffusional area, the target steady state in vitroTD flux for MTX was calculated to be 35 μg/cm2/hr. Modified Franz diffusion chambers and hairless mouse skin were used for in vitro skin permeation studies. Hairless mice were used for in vivo studies. Delivered amounts of MTX and EDAM were determined by assaying the receiver phase fluid (or blood) with validated reversed phase HPLC methods.

Results. Intrinsic partition coefficient of MTX was low (log P = −1.2). Target MTX fluxes of ≥ 35 μg/cm2/hr were achievable only with 1−15% (v/v) Azone® in propylene glycol (PG). Flux of EDAM (85 μg/cm2/hr) was higher than MTX from an isopropyl alcohol (IPA)—5% (v/v) Azone® system. Clinically significant steady state in vivo blood concentration of MTX and EDAM was achieved using delivery systems containing ≥ 2.5% Azone® in PG. Area under the drug concentration-time curves (AUC0−24hr) for MTX were 2379 and 3534 ng*hr/ml from PG—2.5% Azone® and PG—7.5% Azone® systems respectively. AUC0-24hr of EDAM was 6893 ng*hr/ml using a PG—2.5% Azone® system.

Conclusions. Results of this study show the feasibility of using a transdermal delivery system of MTX and EDAM for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. Gubner, S. August, and V. Ginsberg. Am. J. Med. Sci. 22:176–182 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. B. Rees, J. H. Bennett, and H. L. Arnold. Arch. Dermatol 95:2–11 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. F. Willkens, M. A. Watson, C. S. Paxon. J. Rheumatol. 7:501–505 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. S. Wilke, L. H. Calabrese, and A. L. Scherbel. Pilot study. Clev. Clin. Q. 47:305–309 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. T. Hoffmeister. Oral gold therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Auranofin. Am. J. Med. (suppl 7A) 75:69–73 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilke W. S, (editor). Methotrexate Therapy In Rheumatic Diseases: Marcel Dekker, New York (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. E. Weinblatt. J. Rheumatol. 12(suppl.):35–39 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. W. St. Clair, J. R. Rice, and R. Snyderman. Arch. Intern. Med. 145:2034–2038 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Rau and T. Karger. Arthritis Rheum. 19:S76 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. S. Alarcon, I. C. Tracy, W. D. Blackburn Jr. Arthritis Rheum. 32:671–676 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. J. Brooks, W. J. Spruill, P. C. Roy, and D. A. Birchmore. Arthritis Rheum. 33:91–94 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. A. Ball, J. L. McCullough, and G. D. Weinstien. J. Invest. Dermatol. 79:7–10 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. D. Weinstien and J. Velasco. J. Invest. Dermatol. 59:121–127.

  14. L. Biro, R. Carriere, L. Frank, S. Minkowitz, and P. Petrou. J. Invest. Dermatol. 48:429–437.

  15. S. M Wallace, J. O. Runikus, and W. D. Stewart. Can. J. Pharm. Sci. 13:66–68 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. L. McCullough, D. S. Snyder, G. D. Weinstien, A. Friedland, and B. Stein. J. Invest. Dermatol. 66:103–107 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. J Fort, Z. Shao, A. K. Mitra. Int. J. Pharm. 100:233–239 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. Siddiqui, M. S. Roberts, and A. E. Polack. Int. J. Pharm. 27:193–203 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. R. Brian. Int. J. Pharm. 71:R9 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. J. Aungst, J. A. Blake, and M. A. Hussain. Pharm. Res. 7:712–718 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. J. Skeith, C. Ramos-Remus, and A. S. Russell. J. Rheumatol. 21:473–475 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. A. Herman, P. Veng-Pederson, J. Hoffman, R. Koehnke, and D. E. Furst. J. Pharm. Sci. 78:165–171 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Furst D. E. J. Rheumatol. 12:(suppl 12) 11–14 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. J. Sinnet, G. D. Groff, D. A. Raddatz, W. A. Franck, and J. S. Bertino. J. Rheumatol. 16:745–748 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. J. Chatterjee. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California (1996).

  26. L. F. Montes, J. L. Day, C. J. Wand, and L. Kennedy. J. Invest. Dermatol. 48:184–187 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. B. Barry. J. Control. Rel. 6:85 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Goodman and B. W. Barry. In Bronaugh R. L. and Maibach H. I. (eds.), Percutaneous Absorption, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989, chap. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Okamoto, K. Muta, M. Hashida, and H. Sezaki. Pharm. Res. 7:64 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Kadir and B. W. Barry. Int. J. Pharm. 70:87 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhruba J. Chatterjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatterjee, D.J., Li, W.Y. & Koda, R.T. Effect of Vehicles and Penetration Enhancers on the In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption of Methotrexate and Edatrexate Through Hairless Mouse Skin. Pharm Res 14, 1058–1065 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012109513643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012109513643

Navigation