Skip to main content
Log in

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Visualization of the Transport of Dextrans After Nasal Administration to Rats: Effects of Absorption Enhancers

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To visualize the transport pathway(s) of high molecular weight model compounds across rat nasal epithelium in vivousing confocal laser scanning microscopy. Furthermore, the influence of nasal absorption enhancers (randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin and sodium taurodihydrofusidate) on this transport was studied.

Methods. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled dextrans with a molecular weight of 3,000 or 10,000 Da were administered intranasally to rats. Fifteen minutes after administration the tissue was fixed with Bouin. The nasal septum was surgically removed and stained with Evans Blue protein stain or DiIC18(5) lipid stain prior to visualization with the confocal laser scanning microscope.

Results. Transport of FITC-dextran 3,000 across nasal epithelium occurred via the paracellular pathway. Endocytosis of FITC-dextran 3,000 was also shown. In the presence of randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin 2% (w/v) similar transport pathways for FITC-dextran 3,000 were observed. With sodium taurodihydrofusidate 1% (w/v) the transport route was also paracellular with endocytosis, but cells were swollen and mucus was extruded into the nasal cavity. For FITC-dextran 10,000 hardly any transport was observed without enhancer, or after co-administration with randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin 2% (w/v). Co-administration with sodium taurodihydrofusidate 1% (w/v) resulted in paracellular transport of FITC-dextran 10,000, but morphological changes, i.e. swelling of cells and mucus extrusion, were observed.

Conclusions. Confocal laser scanning microscopy is a suitable approach to visualize the transport pathways of high molecular weight hydrophilic compounds across nasal epithelium, and to study the effects of absorption enhancers on drug transport and cell morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. A. Monteiro-Riviere and J. A. Popp. Am. J. Anat. 169:31–43 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. K. I. Hosoya, H. Kubo, H. Natsume, K. Sugibayashi, Y. Morimoto, and S. Yamashita. Biopharm. Drug Disp. 14:685–696 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. N. Fisher, L. Illum, S. S. Davis, and E. H. Schacht. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 44:550–554 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. C. McMartin, L. E. F. Hutchinson, R. Hyde, and G. E. Peters. J. Pharm. Sci. 76:535–540 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. W. A. J. J. Hermens, C. W. J. Belder, J. M. W. M. Merkus, P. M. Hooymans, J. Verhoef, and F. W. H. M. Merkus. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 40:35–41 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. G. M. Schipper, J. C. Verhoef, S. G. Romeijn, and F. W. H. M. Merkus. Calcif. Tissue Int. 56:280–282 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Matsubara, K. Abe, T. Irie, and K. Uekama. J. Pharm. Sci. 84:1295–1300 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. P. A. Baldwin, C. K. Klingbeil, C. J. Grimm, and J. P. Longenecker. Pharm. Res. 7:547–552 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Kissel, J. Drewe, S. Bantle, A. Rummelt, and C. Beglinger. Pharm. Res. 9:52–57 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Rojanasakul, S. W. Paddock, and J. R. Robinson. Int. J. Pharm. 61:163–172 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Bacallao, K. Kiai, and L. Jesaitis. In J. B. Pawley (ed.), Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, Plenum Press, New York and London, 1995, pp. 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. C. Uraih and R. R. Maronpot. Environ. Health Persp. 85:187–208 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Saria and J. M. Lundberg. J. Neurosci. Meth. 8:41–49 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. F. Nagelkerke and H. J. G. M. De Bont. J. Micros. 184:58–61 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Marttin, J. C. Verhoef, S. G. Romeijn, P. Zwart, and F. W. H. M. Merkus. Int. J. Pharm. 141:151–160 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Verdugo. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 52:157–176 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Agerholm, L. Bastholm, P. B. Johansen, M. H. Nielsen, and F. Elling. J. Pharm. Sci. 83:618–663 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Y. Jeon, N. J. Kim, E. G. Hwang, S. K. Hong, and Y. G. Min. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104:895–898 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Richardson, T. Bouchard, and C. C. Ferguson. Lab. Invest. 35:307–314 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M. A. Hurni, A. B. Noach, M. C. M. Blom-Rosmalen, A. G. De Boer, J. F. Nagelkerke, and D. D. Breimer. J. Pharmacol. Ex. Ther. 267:942–950 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. G. Chandler, L. Illum, and N. W. Thomas. Int. J. Pharm. 76:61–70 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. D. Ennis, L. Borden, and W. A. Lee. Pharm. Res. 7:468–475 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Marttin, J. C. Verhoef, S. G. Romeijn, and F. W. H. M. Merkus. Pharm. Res. 12:1151–1157 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marttin, E., Verhoef, J.C., Cullander, C. et al. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Visualization of the Transport of Dextrans After Nasal Administration to Rats: Effects of Absorption Enhancers. Pharm Res 14, 631–637 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012109329631

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012109329631

Navigation