Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity for osmotic adjustment and root depth in TEF [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter]

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osmotic adjustment (OA) and deep roots were shown to be important drought resistance mechanism in many crop plants. In this study, geno types systematically selected from an Ethiopian endemic tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter] germplasm pool were evaluated for osmotic adjustment and root depth in greenhouse in several experiments. The association of these traits with other plant characters was also studied. Osmotic adjustment was investigated in two experiments. Experiment 1 was conducted using nine genotypes for two seasons (spring and fall 1996), and experiment 2 was undertaken in the spring of 1997 with 45 genotypes. In experiment 1, there were significant genotype effects on OA. Though there was also significant genotype by season interaction for OA, some of the extreme lines gave consistently high (Ada and DZ-01-99) and low (DZ-01-354 and Trotteriana) OA values across seasons. There was a significant variation among genotypes for OA in experiment 2. Osmotic adjustment was not associated with the altitude of the region of origin of the particular tef genotype. In both experiments, OA was significantly correlated across tef genotypes with delayed wilting and the maintenance of higher relative water content (RWC) under conditions of soil moisture stress. Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the phenotypic diversity for root depth. In all experiments tef genotypes differed significantly for root depth as measured at flowering time. The late maturing genotypes tended to have greater root depth as compared to early maturing genotypes. Root depth was not associated with the altitude of the region of origin of the tested genotypes. There was no association between root depth and OA across genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerson, R.C., D.R. Kreig & F.J.M. Sung, 1980. Osmoregulation and leaf conductance of field grown sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci 20: 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenta-Soto, J., T.T. Chang, G.C. Loresto & J.C. O'Toole, 1983. Genetic analysis of root characters in rice (Oryza sativa L). Soc Adv Breeding Res Asia Oceania J 15: 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu, R.C., M.S. Pathan, A. Blum & H.T. Nguyen, 1999. Comparison of measurement methods of osmotic adjustment in rice cultivars. Crop Sci 39: 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrs, H.D. & P.E. Weatherley, 1962. A reexamination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci 15: 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basnayake, J.,M. Cooper, M.M. Ludlow, R.G. Henzell & P.J. Snell, 1995. Inheritance of osmotic adjustment to water stress in three sorghum crosses. Theor Appl Genet 90: 675–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., 1988. Breeding for Stress Environment. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., 1989. Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Sci 29: 230–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. & C.Y. Sullivan, 1986. The comparative drought resistance of landraces of sorghum and millet from dry and humid regions. Ann Bot 57: 835–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culter, J.M., K.W. Shahan & P.L. Steponkus, 1980. Alteration of the internal water relations of rice in response to drought hardening. Crop Sci 20: 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekanayake, I.J., J.C. O'Toole., D.P. Garrity & T.M. Masajo, 1985. Inheritance of root characters and their relations to drought in rice. Crop Sci 25: 927–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, D.J., A.U. Rani & J.M. Peacock, 1990. Influence of osmotic adjustment on the growth, stomatal conductance and light interception of contrasting sorghum lines in a harsh environment. Aust J Plant Phys 17: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, A., I. Martin & L. Ayerbe, 1999. Barley yield in water stress conditions. The influence of precocity, osmotic adjustment and stomatal conductance. Field Crop Res 62: 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, I.E., V. Mahalakshmi, F.R. Bidinger & G. Alagarswamy, 1982. Osmotic adjustment to water stress in pearl millet (Pennisitum americanum [L.] Plant. Cell Environ 5: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, E.A., 1974. Phenotype and drought tolerance in wheat. Agric Meteorol 14: 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamaux, I., A. Steinmetz & E. Belhassen, 1997. Looking for molecular and physiological markers of osmotic adjustment in sunflower. The New Phytol 137: 117–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karami, E., D.R. Kreig & J.E. Quisenberry, 1980. Water relations and carbon 14 assimilation of cotton with different leaf morphology. Crop Sci 20: 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O., 1952. The Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, J.M., M.M. Ludlow, S.R. McCouch, M.C. Champoux & J.C. O'Toole, 1996. Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice. J Expt Bot 47: 1427–1436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorens, G.F., J.M. Bennet & L.B. Loggale, 1987. Difference in drought resistance between two corn hybrids II component analysis and growth rates. Agron J 79: 808–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, M.M. & R.C. Muchow, 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agronomy 43: 107–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.M., 1983. Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 34: 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.M., 1984. Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35: 299–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.M., 1991. A gene controlling differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 18: 249–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.M., R.A. Hare & R.J. Fletcher, 1986. Genetic variation in osmoregulation in bread wheat and durum wheats and its relationship to grain yield in a range of field environmrents. Aust J Agric Res 37: 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, J.C., 1982. Adaptation of Rice to Drought Prone Environments. Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Rice. IRRI, Los Bañ os, Philippines. pp. 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, J.C. & W.L. Bland, 1987. Genotypic variation in crop plant root systems. Adv Agron 41: 91–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura, J.B., 1983. In: J.F. Stone & W.O. Williams (Eds.), Plant Production and Management under Drought Condition, pp. 265–280. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y. & J.D. Fry, 1997. Water relations and drought tolerance of four turfgrasses. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 122: 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguezmaribona, B., J.L. Tenorio, J.R. Conde & L. Ayerbe. 1992. Correlation between yield and osmotic adjustment of peas (Pisum sativum L.) under drought stress. Field crops Res 29: 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, F.J., M. Manzanares, E.F. de Andres, J.L. Tenorio & L. Ayerbe, 1998. Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment, soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crop Res 59: 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaria, J.M., M.M. Ludlow & S. Fukai, 1990. Contribution of osmotic Adjustment to grain yield in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under water-limited conditions. I. Water stress before anthesis. Aust J Agric Res 41: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, W.X. & T.J. Blake, 1997. Gas exchange and water relations response to drought of fast and slow growing black spruce families. Can J Bot 75: 1700–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, D., 1975. A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63: 995–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N.C., J.E. Begg & M.L. Tonnett, 1978. Osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water deficits and its influence on the water potential at which stomata close. Aust J Plant Physiol 5: 597–608.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N.I., 1951. The origin, variation, immunity, and breeding of cultivated plants (translated from the Russia by K. Starr Chester). The Ronald Press Co., New York. pp. 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P.R., J.M. Morgan & R.S. Jessop, 1997. Turgor maintenance by osmoregulation in Brassica napus and Brassica juncea under field conditions. Ann Bot 80: 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G.C. & R.C.G. Smith, 1983. Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. II Root water uptake and water use. Aust J Agric Res 34: 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G.C., R.C.G. Smith & J.R. McWilliam, 1983. Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. I Crop growth and yield response. Aust J Agric Res 34: 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayele, M., Blum, A. & Nguyen, H.T. Diversity for osmotic adjustment and root depth in TEF [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter]. Euphytica 121, 237–249 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012099914738

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012099914738

Navigation