Skip to main content
Log in

Interrelationships between cropping systems for pod and seed quality components and breeding implications in common bean

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breeding programmes in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) have mainly focused on performance under monoculture conditions. Interactions among cultivars and cropping systems do occur and genotypes bred for pure cropping may not be suitable for intercropping. This study was undertaken to obtain estimates of genetic parameters of quality traits for bush bean landraces grown in two cropping systems, and the interrelationships of these traits between pure cropping and intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.). Field experiments were conducted at two locations for two years. Expression of most traits was not strongly influenced by genotype × environment interactions. Heritability estimates were similar in both cropping systems for most pod and seed quality traits. Positive correlations were observed between pure cropping and intercropping for pod characters (weight, length, width and texture) and seed characters (dry and imbided weight, length, hardness, coat proportion, water absorption and crude protein). Use of a selection index is suggested for breeding for seed size, water absorption,coat proportion and crude protein for both cropping systems. However, larger gains would be expected in pure cropping for most traits. Bean accessions PHA-0267, PHA-0285, PHA-0286 and PHA-0299 should be used for developing acceptable culinary and high protein breeding lines for either cropping system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M.W. & C.L. Bedford, 1973. Breeding food for improved processing and consumersacceptance properties. In: N. Milner (Ed.), Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding, pp. 299–304. Proceedings. United Nations Protein Advisory Group, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Amankwa, G. & T.E. Michaels, 1997.Genetic variances, heritabilities and genetic correlations of grain yield, harvest index and yield components for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in sole crop and in maize x bean intercrop. Can J Plant Sci 77: 537–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J.,1986. Selection Indices in Plant Breeding. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.

  • Baker, R.J., 1994. Breeding methodsand selection indices for improved tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in cool season food legumes. Euphytica 73: 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boletin Oficial del Estado, 1989. Metodos Oficiales de Analisis de Alimentos para Animales (Piensos) y susPrimeras Materias 128: 16023–16084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brim, C.A., H.W. Johnson & C. Clark Cockerman, 1959. Multipleselection criteria in soybeans. Agron J 51: 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casañas, F., L. Bosch, E. Sanchez, R. Romero del Castillo, J. Valero, M. Baldi, J. Mestres & F. Nuez, 1997. Collecting, conservation and variability of this Ganxet common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Genet Res Newsl 112: 105–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIAT, 1983. Etapas de desarrollo de laplanta de frijol comun. Guia de Estudio. CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical). Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R.E. & R.H. Moll, 1963. Genotype-environment interactions. In:W.D. Hanson & H.F. Robinson(Eds.), Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, pp. 164–194. Washington. NAS-NRC 982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, F.M.,G.L. Hosfield, J.D. Kelly & M.A. Uebersax, 1997. Genetic analysis and interrelationships between traits for cooking time, water absorption, and protein and tannin content of Andean dry beans. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 122: 512–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escribano, M.R., M. Santalla & A.M. de Ron, 1997. Genetic diversity in pod and seed quality traits of common beanpopulations from northwestern Spain. Euphytica 93: 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction toQuantitative Genetics, 3rd ed. Longthan Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C.A., 1978. Multiple cropping potentials ofbeans and maize. Hortsci 13: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C.A., M. Pragger, D.R. Laing & C.A. Flor, 1978.Genotype x environment interactions in bush bean cultivars in monoculture and associated with maize. Crop Sci 18: 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaden, A., G.L. Hosfield, M.W. Adams & M.A. Uebersax, 1984. Variability in culinary quality,component interrelationships, and breeding implications in navy and pinto beans. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 109: 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I.L., D.E. Byth & L.N. Balaam, 1972. Variance of heritability ratios estimated from phenotypic variancecomponents. Biometrics 28: 401–415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda Fo, 1988. Quantitative Geneticsin Maize Breeding, 2nd ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosfield, G.L. & M.A. Uebersax, 1980.Variability in physicochemical properties and nutritional components of tropical and domestic dry bean germplasm. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 105: 246–252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosfield, G.L., M.A. Uebersax & T.G. Isleib, 1984. Seasonal and genotypiceffects on yield and physic-chemical seed characteristics related to food quality in dry edible beans. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 109: 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R.H. & C.W. Stuber, 1974. Quantitative genetics - empirical results relevant to plantbreeding. Adv Agron 26: 277–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M.T., A. Martinez & J.I. Cubero, 1985. Bean productionin Spain. In: Potential for Field Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in West Asia and North Africa, pp. 70–85. The Ford Foundation, CIAT and ICARDA.

  • Robinson, H.F., R.E. Comstock & P.H. Harvey, 1951. Genotypic and phenotypiccorrelations in corn and their implications in selection. Agron J 43: 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1989.SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6, 4th ed., Vols. 1 and 2. SAS Institute INC, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellie, K.C. & G.L. Hosfield, 1991. Genotype x environmental effects on food quality of common bean: resource-efficient testing procedures. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 11: 732–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, K.J., G.L. Hosfield, M.A. Uebersax & J.D. Kelly,1997. Navy bean canning quality: correlations, heritability estimates, and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers associated with component traits. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 122: 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, J. & J.H.C. Davis, 1991.The agronomy of intercropping with beans. In: A. van Schoonhoven & O. Voysest (Eds.), Common Bean. Research for Cropping Improvement, pp. 707–730. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M.J.0., 1996. Breeding for yield in mixtures of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and maize (Zea maysL.). Euphytica 92: 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santalla, M., Amurrio, J. & de Ron, A. Interrelationships between cropping systems for pod and seed quality components and breeding implications in common bean. Euphytica 121, 45–51 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012080303872

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012080303872

Navigation