Skip to main content
Log in

Mirtazapine Pharmacokinetics with Two Dosage Regimens and Two Pharmaceutical Formulations

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To compare, in a clinical study of a special design, the pharmacokinetic profile of mirtazapine in 20 young healthy male volunteers on two treatment regimens with homothetic oral tablets at steady state: NOCTE (1 × 30 mg at 21.00 h) and BID (15 mg at 21.00 h and 15 mg at 09.00 h).

Methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from mirtazapine plasma levels assayed by gas chromatography with nitrogen-sensitive detection. A special analysis of variance allowed interesting interactions to be distinguished.

Results. The steady state was reached after 4 and 6 days for NOCTE and BID respectively; the difference was presumably due to intersubject variability. In accordance with pharmacokinetic theory, the peak-to-trough ratio at steady state was significantly lower (twofold) for BID than for NOCTE. Within BID, a small difference (approx. 10%) was found in the extent of absorption between evening and morning administration. Although statistically significant, this difference meets strict bioequivalence requirements. The regimens NOCTE and BID were found to be bioequivalent for the steady-state area-under-the-curve-curve and the peak time. Bioequivalence testing for the peak level was not meaningful due to the difference in dosing regimens. The observed elimination half-lives of 19.7 ± 3.0 h and 20.8 ± 2.7 h (n = 20) for NOCTE and BID, respectively are in agreement with previous results.

Conclusions. Differences (if any) were found to meet strict bioequivalence requirements and were so small that they are of no clinical consequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. de Boer, F. Nefkens, and A. van Helvoirt. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 253:R5–6, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. T. de Boer and G. S. F. Ruigt. CNS Drugs 4:(Suppl 1), 29–38, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. de Montigny, N. Haddjeri, R. Mongeau, and P. Blier. CNS Drugs 4:(Suppl 1), 13–17, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Voortman and J. E. Paanakker. Human Psychopharmacol. 10:(Suppl 2), S83–96, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. J. Timmer, A. Lohmann and C. P. A. Mink. Human Psychopharmacol. 10:(Suppl 2), S97–106, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. J. Timmer, J. E. Paanakker and H. J. M. van Hal. Human Psychopharmacol., in press.

  7. F. M. Kaspersen, A. A. M. van Rooij, E. G. M. Sperling, and J. H. Wieringa. J. Lab. Comp. Radiopharm. 27:1055–1068, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Paanakker and H. J. M. van Hal. J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Appl. 417:203–207, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guidance. Statistical procedures for bioequivalence testing using a standard two-treatment crossover design. Statement prepared by the Division of Bioequivalence, Office of Generic Drugs of the FDA, informal communication under 21 CFR 10.90, 1992.

  10. Commission on the European Communities, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products CPMP. Note for Guidance, Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence, III/54/89-EN, 1991.

  11. K. K. Midha, E. D. Ormsby, J. W. Hubbard, G. McKay, E. M. Hawes, L. Gavalas, and I. J. McGilveray. J. Pharm. Sci. 82:138–144, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D. J. Schuirmann. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 15:657–680, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. J. Winer. Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971, pp. 851–853.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. P. Wijnand. Comp. Meth. Progr. Biomedicine 49:249–259, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. SAS Institute Inc. SAS User's Guide, Version 5.16, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., U.S.A., 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timmer, C.J., Paanakker, J.E. & Vrijmoed-de Vries, M. Mirtazapine Pharmacokinetics with Two Dosage Regimens and Two Pharmaceutical Formulations. Pharm Res 14, 98–102 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012067703764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012067703764

Navigation