An Assessment of People's Satisfaction with the Public Hearing on the Yadana Natural Gas Pipeline Project

Abstract

Many public and large-scale construction projects inThailand have been faced with environmental and socialconflict problems. The major cause is that project sponsorsdo not address concerns of the public in a proper mannerduring EIA study. The Yadana Natural Gas Pipeline (YNGP)project is an example of a project which suffered theeffects of public demonstration. A public hearing, onetechnique of public participation, is a good mechanism tosolve conflict problems in a non-violent way which the ThaiGovernment usually adopts to settle conflict in constructionprojects. In the case of the YNGP, even after the conflictwas ‘resolved’ hostility towards the project was noteliminated, as the opponents were not satisfied with thedecision. Therefore, this article examines the hearing on theYNGP project. The study found that it was too late to make any significantchanges to the project after the hearing was held, mostrespondents were not satisfied with the project. In otherwords, this hearing did not improve their perception ofenvironmental soundness of the project. The study showedthat the project's impact on the environment was notproperly addressed. The project sponsors did not providesufficient publicity for the meeting and the stage at whichthe hearing was conducted. Suggestions are made forimproving participation in future hearings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Arnstein, S. R.: 1969, ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4), pp. 216–224, July 1969 (cited in Canter, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atibodhi, K.: 1993, Public Hearing as Conflict Resolution Measure in Environmental Management in Thailand, White Paper No. 9, Institute of Public Policy Studies, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bangkok Post: 1998, Sulak and 40 Others Arrested, March 7, 1998, Bangkok, Thailand.

  4. Bishop, A. B.: 1975, Communication in the Planning Process, (cited in Canter, 1996).

  5. Canter, L. W.: 1996, Environmental Impact Assessment, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eidsvik: 1978, ‘Le public et la planification des parcs au Canada’, Parcs 3(1), pp. 3–5, (cited in Parenteau, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific: 1985, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment: Guidelines for Planners and Decision Makers’, Bangkok, Thailand.

  8. Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office: 1988, Manual on Public Involvement in Environmental Assessment: Planning and Implementing Public Involvement Programs, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (cited in Canter, 1996).

  9. Grima, A. P.: 1977, The Role of Public Participation in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process, Department of Geography and Institute for Environmental Studies, Erindale Collage, University of Toronto, Canada (cited in Parenteau, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Institute of Public Policy Studies: 1996, Final Report: The Guideline of Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment, Bangkok, Thailand.

  11. International Development Center of Japan: 1992, Environmental Management: Implications of Local Dimension and the Case in Thailand, Tokyo, Japan.

  12. Kaosa-ard, M.: 1995, Environmental Protection: Rules, Instruments and People's Participation, paper presented at the TDRI 1995 Year-End Conference, Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

  13. Kaosa-ard, M. and Pednekar, S. S.: 1996, Environmental Strategy for Thailand, Natural Resources and Environment Program, Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kanchanawasee S. et al.: 1997, The Selection of Appropriate Statistics for Researches, Pacharakarn Publication, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mallikamarl, S.: 1996, Enforcement of Environmental Laws, Nititham, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment: 1992, Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, B.E.2535, Bangkok.

  17. Munn, R. E.: 1979, Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures, Institute for Environmental Studies, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Economic and Social Development Board: 1996, The Eighth National Economic and Social Development Plan (1997–2001), Bangkok, Thailand.

  19. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning: 1997, THAILAND: Policy and Prospective Plan for Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality, 1997–2016, Bangkok, Thailand.

  20. Office of Prime Minister: 1996, Public Hearings Rule, Thai Gazette, Vol. 113, No. 2, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parenteau, R.: 1988, Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making, Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Petroleum Authority of Thailand: 1997, The Yadana Natural Gas Pipeline Project, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

  23. Rayanakorn, K.: 1997, Thai Environmental Laws, TDRI Report (19), Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sawangsak, C.: 1997, Public Hearings, Winyuchon Publication House, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwertz Jr., E. L.: 1979, The Local Growth Management Guidebook, Center for Local Government Technology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater (cited in Canter, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sewell, W. R. D. and O'Riordan, T.: 1976, ‘The Culture of Participation in Environmental Decision-Making’,Natural Resources Journal 16, pp. 1–22, January 1976 (cited in Parenteau, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sudara, S.: 1996, ‘Environmental Problems and Activities for Protection in the Third World: The Thai Experience’, in S. Yuji et al. (eds.), Global Environmental Security, Springer, Germany, pp. 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The Council of State: 1997, ‘The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand’, Bangkok, Thailand.

  29. The Nation: 1988, Nam Choan Inquiry: The Environmental Dilemma of the Decade, April 18, 1988, Bangkok, Thailand.

  30. Tongcumpou, C.: 1991, A Critique of the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure in Thailand, Master's Thesis in Environmental Studies, University of Adelaide, Australia (cited in Xiaoying, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: 1971, Public Participation in Water Resources Planning, EC 1165–2–100, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C. (cited in Canter, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilkinson, P.: 1974, ‘The Role of the Public in Environmental Decision-Making’, in Dwivedi (ed.), Protecting the Environment, Coop Clark, pp. 21–250 (cited in Parenteau, 1988).

  33. World Bank: 1996, ‘The World Bank Participation Sourcebook’, Economic Development Institute, World Bank.

  34. Xiaoying, T.: 1995, A Study of the Institutional Effectiveness in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): The Case of Thailand, Master's Research, NR–95–5, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yadana Hearing Committee: 1998, ‘Hearing Report on the Yadana Natural Gas Pipeline Project’, Petroleum Authority of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silas Yisa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogunlana, S., Yotsinsak, T. & Yisa, S. An Assessment of People's Satisfaction with the Public Hearing on the Yadana Natural Gas Pipeline Project. Environ Monit Assess 72, 207–225 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012043818678

Download citation

  • environmental impact
  • public hearing
  • satisfaction
  • Thailand
  • Yadana