Evaluation of a Cmin and a Normalized Cmin Method for the Confirmation of Steady-State in Bioequivalence Studies

Abstract

Purpose. Two methods to confirm attainment of steady-state conditions in multiple-dose bioequivalence studies are described and evaluated: (1) the Cmin method and (2) the Area Below the Cmin plasma-concentration-versus-time-curve method (ABCM method).

Methods. Cmin Method—After repetitive drug administration to presumed steady-state, successive trough, or Cmin, values are evaluated to determine if they are equal. ABCM Method—The ABCM of successive doses from dose two to presumed steady-state [ABCM(ss)] are divided by the ABCM for the first dose, ABCM(t), to give ABCM(ss)/ ABCM(t)=R, which describes the increase in ABCM(n) with successive doses. The quantity, R, is then divided by an accumulation ratio to render the value independent of intra-subject clearance differences. Monte Carlo simulations were done to test the effects of data error and slow-clearing subpopulations on the method's performance. Data from multiple-dose bioequivalence studies were evaluated using confidence intervals for both methods to determine how well each predicted steady-state for immediate-release and controlled-release drug products.

Results/Conclusions. The Cmin method more accurately predicted the attainment of steady-state conditions for immediate-release formulations compared to the ABCM method. Conversely, the ABCM procedure more accurately predicted the attainment of steady-state conditions for controlled-release formulations compared to the Cmin method. The simulation results were further supported by the experimental data.