Skip to main content
Log in

Reexamining the Robustness of the Market Value of Equity

  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We apply the methodology of Knez and Ready (KR) (1997) to data from the Japanese stock market and reexamine the robustness of the risk premium for the market value of equity (MVE). In particular, we compare two alternative explanations for the relation between stock returns and MVE: the one pointed out by Fama and French (FF) (1992) and the other proposed by Berk (1995). Consistent with results for the U.S. market, when we check FF's explanation for MVE, we find that the risk premium for MVE is not robust against extreme observations. Besides the evidence supporting KR's findings, we study the role of MVE proposed by Berk (1995), who points out that under controlled expected cash flows, MVE will be negatively correlated with expected returns. After showing that MVE negatively correlates with risk in the presence of expected cash flows, we test the robustness of the relation between returns and MVE. We find that the estimated risk premium for MVE is robust when realized cash flows (earnings plus depreciation) or book value of equity (BE) is used as a proxy for expected cash flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banz, R. W. (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, J. Financ. Econom. 9, 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (1983) The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence, J. Financ. Econom. 12, 129-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, J. B. (1995) A critique of size-related anomalies, Rev. Financ. Stud. 8, 275-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, J. B. (1997) Does size really matter?, J. Financ. Anal. 53, 12-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, G. C. and Hunt, A. L. (1997) An Equity Cash Flow Perspective on the Book to Market Equity Ratio's Ability to Predict Stock Returns, Working Paper, University of Washington.

  • Black, F. (1993) Beta and return, J. Portfolio Managt 20, 8-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C. and Chen, N. (1991) Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms, J. Finance 46, 1467-1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C., Hamao, Y., and Lakonishok, J. (1991) Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan, J. Finance 46, 1739-1764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and MacBeth, J. D. (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests, J. Political Economy 81, 607-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and French, K. (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns, J. Finance 47, 427-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and French, K. (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, J. Financ. Econom. 33, 3-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and French, K. (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies, J. Finance 51, 55-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R. and Lee, C. M. C. (1998) Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns, J. Account. Econom. 25, 283-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawawini, G. (1991) Stock market anomalies and the pricing of equity in the Tokyo stock exchange. In W. T. Ziemba, W. Bailey, and Y. Hamao (eds), Japanese Financial Market Research, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 231-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawawini, G. and Keim, D. B. (1995) On the predictability of common stock returns: World-wide evidence. In R. A. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W. T. Ziemba (eds), Handbooks in OR and MS, Vol. 9, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 497-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R. and Wang, Z. (1996) The conditional CAPM and the cross-section of expected returns, J. Finance 51, 3-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knez, P. J. and Ready, M. J. (1997) On the robustness of size and book-to-market in the crosssectional regressions, J. Finance 52, 1355-1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., and Sloan, R. G. (1995) Another look at the cross-section of expected stock returns, J. Finance 50, 157-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, K. and Takehara, H. (1996) Cross-section risk and return of Tokyo stock exchange firms. In T. Boss, and T. Fetherston (eds), Advances in Pacific Basin Financial Markets, Vol. 2, JAI Press Inc., Greenwich CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. (1994) Contrarian investment, extrapolation and risk, J. Finance 49, 1541-1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. K. and West, K. D. (1987) A simple, heteroskedastic and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix, Econometrica 55, 703-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. H. (1996) The articulation of price-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratios and the evaluation of growth, J. Account. Res. 34, 235-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. (1984) Least median of squares regression, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 79, 871-880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. and Hubert, M. (1997) Recent Developments in PROGRESS. L 1 -Statistical Procedures and Related Topics, Y. Dodge Institute of Mathematical Statistics lecture notes,Monograph series 31, pp. 201-214.

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. and LeRoy, A. M. (1987) Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garza-Gómez, X., Hodoshima, J. & Kunimura, M. Reexamining the Robustness of the Market Value of Equity. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 8, 61–85 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011988915768

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011988915768

Navigation