Skip to main content
Log in

Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Analysis

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the quantitative structure-activity relationship of two series of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors (leflunomide and quinoline carboxylic acid analogues), and to determine the structural requirements for optimum activity of these analogues.

Methods. A new CQSAR program was used in deriving regression equations and calculating the octanol/water partition coefficient and the molar refractivity values. The molecular modeling was performed using the HyperChem® program.

Results. Statistically significant correlations were obtained using a combination of 3−4 parameters. The structural requirements for optimum activity and critical regions for the inhibitory activity of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase were identified.

Conclusions. The quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis demonstrated that two series of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors may bind to different binding sites on the enzyme. These results provide a better understanding of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor-enzyme interactions, and may be useful for further modification and improvement of inhibitors of this important enzyme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. E. Jones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49:253–279 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Stryer. Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1988, pp. 601–626.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Weber. Cancer Res. 43:3466–3492 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. L. Elliott, D. P. Sawick, S. A. DeFrees, P. F. Heinstein, J. M. Cassady, and D. J. Morre. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 800:194–201 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Mahmoudian, A. H. Pakiari, and S. Khademi. Biochem. Pharmaco. 43:283–287 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Chen, L. M. Papp, R. J. Ardecky, G. V. Rao, D. P. Hesson, M. Forbes, and D. L. Dexter. Biochem. Pharmaco. 40:709–714 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. A. Kuo, P. T. Hambleton, D. P. Kay, P. L. Evans, S. S. Matharu, E. Little, N. McDowall, C. B. Jones, C. J. R. Hedgecock, C. M. Yea, A. W. E. Chan, P. W. Hairsine, I. R. Ager, W. R. Tully, R. A. Williamson, and R. Westwood. J. Med. Chem. 39:4608–4621 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. J. Lien. SAR side effects and drug design. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, 1987, pp. 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. BioByte Corp. CQSAR data base. 201 West, 4th St., Suite 204, Claremont, CA 919711, 1997.

  10. Hypercube, Inc. HyperChem ® for Windows, Vision 4.0. Publication MC40-00-02-01, 419 Phillip St. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1994.

  11. E. J. Lien. SAR side effects and drug design. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, 1987, pp. 50–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, S., Wu, S.K. & Lien, E.J. Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship Analysis. Pharm Res 15, 286–295 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011978904905

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011978904905

Navigation