Skip to main content
Log in

Goal-Seeking Behavior in a Connectionist Model

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal-seeking behavior in a connectionist modelis demonstrated using the examples of foragingby a simulated ant and cooperativenest-building by a pair of simulated birds. Themodel, a control neural network, translatesneeds into responses. The purpose of this workis to produce lifelike behavior with agoal-seeking artificial neural network. Theforaging ant example illustrates theintermediation of neurons to guide the ant to agoal in a semi-predictable environment. In thenest-building example, both birds, executinggender-specific networks, exhibit socialnesting and feeding behavior directed towardmultiple goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C., Blackwell, P. G. & Cannings, C. (1997). Stochastic Simulation of Ants that Forage by Expectation. In Husbands P. & Harvey I. (eds.) Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albus, J. S. (1979). Mechanisms of Planning and Problem Solving in the Brain. Math. Biosci. 45: 247-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M. & Théraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E. & Théraulaz, G. (2000). Swarm Smarts. Scientific American 282(3): 72-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drogoul, A. & Ferber, J. (1993). From Tom Thumb to the Dockers: Some Experiments with Foraging Robots. In Meyer J-A., Roitblat H. L. and Wilson S. W. (eds.) From Animals to Animats II: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai, Y. (1989). The Neurobiology of Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, L. (1994). Neural Networks in Computer Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Goss, S. & Deneubourg, J.L. (1992). Harvesting by a Group of Robots. In Varela F.J. and Bourgine P. (eds.) Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S. E. (1990). Connectionist Problem Solving: Computational Aspects of Biological Learning. Birkhäuser Boston.

  • Holmes, W. & Rall, W. (1992) Electrotonic Models of Neuronal Dendrites and Single Neuron Computation. In McKenna T. et al. (eds.) Single Neuron Computation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield, J. & Tank, D. (1986). Computing with Neural Circuits: A Model. Science 233: 625-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodjabachian, J. & Meyer, J-A. (1998). Evolution and Development of Neural Controllers for Locomotion, Gradient-Following, and Obstacle-Avoidance in Artificial Insects. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9(5): 796-812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mataric, M. (1995). Designing and Understanding Adaptive Group Behavior. Adaptive Behavior 4(1): 51-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. (1987). Human Motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munakata, T. (1998). Fundamentals of the New Artificial Intelligence: Beyond Traditional Paradigms. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murciano, A. & Millán, J. (1996). Learning Signaling Behaviors and Specialization in Cooperative Agents. Adaptive Behavior 5(1): 5-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolfi, S. & Parisi, D. (1996). Learning to Adapt to Changing Environments in Evolving Neural Networks. Adaptive Behavior 5(1): 75-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parten, C. R. (1990). Handbook of Neural Computing Applications. Academic Press, Inc.

  • Pfaff, D.W. (1982). Motivational Concepts: Definitions and Distinctions. In Pfaff E. (ed.) The Physiological Mechanisms of Motivation. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portegys, T. (1986). GIL-an Experiment in Goal-directed Inductive Learning. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston (Available from UMI at http://www.umi.com/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Portegys, T. (1999). A Connectionist Model of Motivation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'99). IEEE Catalog Number: 99CH36339C.

  • Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavior Model. Computer Graphics 21(4): 25-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (1997) Panel Discussion at ICNN97 on Connectionist Learning. In Levine D. (ed.) Neural Networks 2(2).

  • Schank, R. C., & Childers, P. G. (1984). The Cognitive Computer; On Language, Learning, and Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R., Berger, T. & Berry S. (1980). Brain Anatomy and Function. In Wittrock M. (ed.) The Brain and Psychology. Academic Press.

  • Waltz, D. (1999). The Importance of Importance. AI Magazine 20(3): 18-35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Portegys, T.E. Goal-Seeking Behavior in a Connectionist Model. Artificial Intelligence Review 16, 225–253 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011970925799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011970925799

Navigation