Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced Systemic Availability of an Antiarrhythmic Drug, Bidisomide, with Meal Co-administration: Relationship with Region-Dependent Intestinal Absorption

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of this research was to determine the mechanism by which a co-administered meal decreases the oral absorption of bidisomide and does not influence the oral absorption of the chemically-related antiarrhythmic agent, disopyramide.

Methods. Bidisomide plasma levels, following oral administration and intravenous infusion in the fasted state and with various meal treatments, were determined in human subjects. A dialysis technique was employed to examine the potential for drug binding to meal homogenates. Plasma levels, following drug administration through duodenal and jejunal intestinal access ports and following various meal treatments with oral drug co-administration, were compared for bidisomide and disopyramide in a canine model.

Results. Bidisomide plasma AUC was significantly reduced following oral drug co-administration with breakfast compared to fasted-state controls in human subjects and in dogs independent of the composition of the solid cooked breakfast. While intravenous bidisomide infusion in human subjects showed a statistically significant reduction in AUC 15 minutes after oral administration of a high fat breakfast as compared to drug infusion in the fasted state, the reduction (−13%) was substantially smaller than the reduction (from −43% to −63%) observed with oral bidisomide meal co-administration. The percentages of bidisomide and disopyramide lost by binding to homogenates of cooked breakfast were 25.0 ± 5.7% and 23.7 ± 7.7%, respectively, as determined by dialysis at 4 hours. In dogs, the extent of absorption of disopyramide was comparable from oral, duodenal and mid-jejunal administration while the extent of bidisomide absorption from mid-jejunal administration was significantly lower than for oral or duodenal administration. Non-viscous liquid meals decreased Cmax but not AUC, while viscous homogenized solid meals decreased both Cmax and AUC for bidisomide with oral drug-meal co-administration. Oral non-caloric hydroxypropyl methylcellulose meals decreased bidisomide to the same extent as homogenized solid meals but did not lower disopyramide AUC.

Conclusions. The significant reduction in bidisomide plasma levels observed with meal co-administration in human subjects was predominantly mediated through a reduction in drug absorption and was independent of solid meal composition. The difference in meal effect on the absorption of the two drugs in humans did not appear to be a function of drug binding to cooked meal components over typical human upper gastrointestinal residence times. In dogs, the high-viscosity medium generated by oral co-administration of a solid meal reduced the upper intestinal absorption of bidisomide and disopyramide. Bidisomide AUC was decreased since it was well absorbed in the upper but not lower small intestine. Disopyramide AUC was not significantly affected since it was well absorbed from both regions. A similar mechanism may play a role in drug plasma level reductions following oral co-administration with solid meals for drugs showing similar regionally-dependent absorption profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Karim, J. Clin. Pharmacol. 35:921 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Karim, A. Piergies, and P. Needleman, J. Clin. Pharmacol. 35:921 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. S. Cook, S. J. McDonald, and A. Karim. Xenobiotica 23:1299–1309 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. S. Cook, G. B. Ames, M. E. Smith, K. G. Kowalski, and A. Karim. Pharm. Res. 10:1675–1682 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. S. Cook, G. B. Ames, J. D. Hribar, N. W. K. Liu, D. L. Sweeney, G. L. Schoenhard, and A. Karim. Xenobiotica 25:981–991 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. S. Cook, L. Zhang, G. X. Xu, and G. L. Schoenhard. Pharm. Res. 14:1032–1040 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Garthwaite, F. Hatley, L. Frederick, J. Ruby, and C. S. Cook. Drug Develop. Res. 17:119–133 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. G. Sarr and K. A. Kelly. Am. J. Physiol. 239:G497–G503 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Methocel Cellulose Ethers (Technical Handbook). Midland, MI. Dow Chemical, p. 13.

  10. L.D. Meunier, J. T. Kissinger, J. Marcello, A. J. Nichols, and P. L. Smith. Lab. Anim. Med. 43:466–470 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Y. Kwei, J. R. Gehret, L. B. Novak, M. D. Drag, and T. Goodwin. Lab. Anim. Med. 45:683–685 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. A. Mayer. In Physiology of gastrointestinal tract, 3rd., New York: Raven Press. pp. 929–976 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. M. Stevenson, L. L. Radulovic, H. N. Bockbrader, and D. Fleisher. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:953–957 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Miles, P. Dickson, K. Rana, C. Lippert, and D. Fleisher. Regul. Pep. 68:9–14 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Fleisher, C. L. Lippert, N. Sheth, C. Reppas, and J. Wlodyga, J. Cntrl. Rel. 11:41–49 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. K. Gupta and J. R. Robinson. Int. J. Pharm. 43:45–52 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Reppas, J. H. Mayer, P. J. Sirois, and J. B. Dressman. Gastroenterology 100:1217–1223 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Lachman, H. A. Lieberman, and J. L. Kanig. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. p. 131 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. L. Cussler. Diffusion, mass transfer in fluid system. New York: Cambridge University, pp. 118–122 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. E. Greenwood's dissertation at The University of Michigan, pp. 18–69 (1994).

  21. L. Z. Benet, C. Y. Wu, M. F. Hebert, and V. J. Wacher. J. Cntrl. Rel. 39:139–143 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Borckmeier, H-G. Grigoleit, and H. Leonhardt. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 29:193–197 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. N. Charman, C. J. H. Porter, S. Mithani, and J. B. Dressman. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:269–282 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Y. Kwei, L. B. Novak, L. A. Hettrick, E. R. Reiss, D. Ostovic, A. E. Loper, C. Y. Lui, R. J. Higgins, I-Wu Chen, and J. H. Lin. Pharm. Res. 12:884–888 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. A. Stone, W. D. Ju, A. Steritt, E. J. Woolf, K. C. Yeh, P. Deutsch, S. Waldman, and T. D. Bjornson. Pharm. Res. 13:S-414 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pao, LH., Zhou, S.Y., Cook, C. et al. Reduced Systemic Availability of an Antiarrhythmic Drug, Bidisomide, with Meal Co-administration: Relationship with Region-Dependent Intestinal Absorption. Pharm Res 15, 221–227 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011958400362

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011958400362

Navigation