Skip to main content
Log in

Storying Systems: Managing Everyday Flux Using Mode 2 Soft Systems Methodology

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines work with managers who used a narrative approach to systemic thinking. Storytelling is incorporated within Mode 2 SSM involving a flexible approach to the analysis of complex or "messy" situations at work. Mode 2 SSM is presented as a thinking mode by those within the problem situation, involving the use of various devices of rich pictures, relevant systems, and root definitions, whereby managers and others may make sense of their experiences from within the flux of everyday life. The focus of the approach is learning through reflection on events and activities to consider potential actions and improvements in difficult situations. The findings show the initial difficulty and disappointment of learning to deal with complexity and the unexpected but how quickly the "gain outweighs the pain," as managers learned to attune themselves to the flux of situations, to identify how to work with flows and energies more creatively, and to become conscious of what was happening on the edge of awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Boje, D. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of the performance in an office-supply firm. Admin. Sci. Q. 36, 106-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Crit. Inquiry 18, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1983). OR and the systems movement: Mappings and conflicts. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 34(8), 661-675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990's. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 36(9), 757-767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-Year Retrospective, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (1996). Metaphors and metaphorization in organizational analysis: Thinking beyond the thinkable. In Grant, D., and Oswick, C. (eds.), Metaphor and Organizations, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (1999). A ‘rhizomic’ model of organizational change and transformation. Br. J. Manage. 10(3), 209-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in Organizations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1995). Relational theory and discourses of power. In Hosking, D.-M., Dachler, H. P., and Gergen, K. J. (eds.), Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism, Aldershot, Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J., and Hamblett, J. (1999). Emotions, values and rhetorical performance. A detailed description of a conflict within a human resource management Team. In Abma, T. (ed.), Telling Tales: On Evaluation and Narrative, JAI Press, Stamford, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J., and Holman, D. (1998). “Let me tell you a story”: An evaluation of the Use of Storytelling and Argument Analysis in Management Education. Paper presented at the Leeds-Lancaster Emergent Themes in Management Learning Conference, Leeds, July.

  • Gold, J., Holman, D., and Thorpe, R. (1999). The manager as a critical reflective practitioner: Uncovering arguments at work. Paper presented at the Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester, July.

  • Griffen, D., Shaw, P., and Stacey, R. (1998). Speaking of complexity in management theory and practice. Organization 5(3), 315-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, A. (1999). Myth, meaning, multiplicity and metaphor. In Abma, T. (ed.), Telling Tales: On Evaluation and Narrative, JAI Press, Stamford, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. (1994). The Wittgenstein Reader, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1997). Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, L., and Srivatsan, V. (1993). The problem of experience in the study of organizations. Organiz. Stud. 14(1), 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (1992). Managing Chaos, Kogan Page, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., and Hatch, M. J. (1997). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Paper presented to the American Academy of Management Conference, Boston.

  • Tsouvalis, C., and Checkland, P. (1996). Reflecting on SSM: The Dividing Line BetweenReal WorldandSystems Thinking World,” Working Paper No. 3, Humberside University, Humberside.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1990). Munchhausen's Pigtail: Or Psychotherapy andReality’—Essays and Lectures, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (ed.) (1991). Participatory Action Research, Sage, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gold, J. Storying Systems: Managing Everyday Flux Using Mode 2 Soft Systems Methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research 14, 557–573 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011921102732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011921102732

Navigation