Abstract
Prioritizing the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) targeted R&D program supporting weapons-complex clean-up has been problematic. Considering issues common to all R&D evaluation, linking R&D prioritization to clean-up project prioritization, the latter aligned with institutional goals, offers a pragmatic solution. This method is illustrated with results of a clean-up prioritization model of DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory site.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Status Report on Paths to Closure, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC (March 2000).
U.S. House of Representatives, Incinerating cash; The Department of Energy's failure to develop and use innovative technologies to clean up the nuclear waste legacy, Staff report prepared for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Washington, DC (October 2000).
National Research Council, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, Quantitative Assessments of the Physical and Mathematical Sciences; A Summary of Lessons Learned (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994).
C. Wagner and A. Flanagan, Workshop on the metrics of fundamental science: A summary, PM-379-OSTP, RAND, Washington, DC (February 1995).
R.L. Kirschstein and A.C. Petersen, Assessing Fundamental Science, Memorandum for Members of the Subcommittee on Research of the Committee on Fundamental Science, National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC (11 December, 1995).
National Research Council, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, Research Restructuring and Assessment. Can We Apply the Corporate Experience to Government Agencies? (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1995).
A.N. Link, ed., Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development (Praeger, Westport, CT, 1996).
Z. Griliches, Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint, Am. Econ. Rev. 84 (1994) 1–23.
T.P. Mamuneas and M.I. Nadiri, Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries, J. Pub. Econ. 63 (1996) 57–81.
National Research Council, Committee on Mixed Wastes, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, The State of Development ofWaste Forms for Mixed Wastes. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999).
D.W. Jones, K.S. Redus and D.J. Bjornstad, The consequences of alternative environmental management goals: A non-linear programming analysis of nuclear weapons legacy clean-up at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Modeling & Assessment 5 (2000) 1–17.
C.L. Dümmer, D.J. Bjornstad and D.W. Jones, Opportunities for regulatory reform for DOE Cleanup, JIEE 2000/03, Joint Institute for Energy and Environment, Knoxville, TN (26 April, 2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, D.W., Bjornstad, D.J. & Redus, K.S. Prioritizing R&D for the U.S. Department of Energy's Weapons Complex Clean-Up. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 6, 209–215 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011918117779
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011918117779