Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons for Business Ethics from Bioethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three widely accepted principles – autonomy, beneficence and justice – provide a useful analytic framework for considering controversies and conflicts in bioethics. Since these principles capture key concepts found in diverse normative theories they provide a starting point from which consistent ethical analysis and comparison can begin. While justice is commonly discussed in the business ethics literature, the other two principles are not widely discussed. This paper investigates whether the principles of autonomy and beneficence provide a framework that is equally useful for framing issues in business ethics. It is argued that they do. First, the principle of autonomy, with its associated notions of informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, voluntariness, self-mastery, and so on, provides a consistent approach to the analysis of diverse issues that arise in business ethics from market research to recruitment practices. Second, it is argued that the relationships between a business and its stakeholders ground duties of beneficence. The principle of beneficence provides a framework for considering the issues that arise in these relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L.: 1989, ‘Ethical Theory and Bioethics', in Tom L. Beauchamp andLeRoy Walters (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Third Edition (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L.: 1999, ‘Ethical Theory and Bioethics', in Tom L. Beauchamp andLeRoy Walters (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Fifth Edition (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. andJ. F. Childress: 1994, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fourth Edition (Oxford University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. and L. B. McCullough: 1991, ‘Two Models of Moral Responsibility in Medicine', in T. A Mappes. andS. J. Zembaty (eds.), Biomedical Ethics, Third Edition (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, C. A.: 1998, Ethics for Health Care (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, M.: 1992, ‘Distributing Health Care Resources: Ethical Assumptions’ (Australian Health Ethics Committee, Background Paper for AHEC Workshop).

  • Charlesworth, M.: 1993, Bioethics in a Liberal Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J. F.: 1989, ‘Ethical Criteria for Procuring and Distributing Organs for Transplantation', in James F. Blumstein andFrank A. Sloan (eds.), Organ Transplantation Policy (Duke University Press, Durham).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R. T.: 1999, Business Ethics, Fifth Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G.: 1988, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R. B. andG. C. Graber: 1988, Bio-Ethics (Harcourt Brace, San Diego).

    Google Scholar 

  • Englehardt, H. T.: 1986, ‘The Principles of Bioethcs', The Foundations of Bioethics, Third Edition (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • English, D. C.: 1994, Bioethics: A Clinical Guide for Medical Students (Norton, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W.: 1973, Ethics, Second Edition (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, R.: 1994, ‘Introduction', in R. Gillon (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, T, Co-ordinating ed.: 1995, The Law Handbook, Fifth Edition (Redfern Legal Centre Publishing Service, Redfern).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. E.: 1993, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis', in T. I White (ed.), Business Ethics: A Philosophical Reader (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mappes, T. A. and J. S. Zembaty: 1991, ‘Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory', in T. A Mappes andS. J. Zembaty (eds.), Biomedical Ethics, Third Edition (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.: 1998, ‘What is Really Unethical about Insider Trading?’ in W. H. Shaw andV. Barry (eds.), Moral Issues in Business, Seventh Edition (Wadsworth, Belmont CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresnowski, B. R.: 1993, ‘The Necessary Debate', Woodstock Report, December 1993, no. 36 (Woodstock Theological Center) http: //www.georgetown. edu/centers/woodstock/ report accessed 2 April, 2001.

  • United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: 1978, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (The Belmont Report) (Publication No. OS 78–0012, United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R. M.: 1989, ‘An Ethical Framework for Hospital Ethics Committees', in Tom L. Beauchamp andLeRoy Walters (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Third Edition (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, J. Lessons for Business Ethics from Bioethics. Journal of Business Ethics 34, 15–24 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011916709062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011916709062

Keywords

Navigation