Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Disposition of Ester Prodrugs of the Antiviral Agent 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine [PMEA] in Caco-2 Monolayers

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the potential of several bis-ester prodrugs of the antiviral agent 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA, adefovir) to enhance the oral absorption of PMEA.

Methods. Caco-2 monolayers were used to estimate intestinal transport and metabolism of the bis(pivaloyloxymethyl)-ester [bis(POM)-] and a series of bis(S-acyl-2-thioethyl)-esters [bis(SATE)-] of PMEA. An LC-MS method was used for the identification of unknown metabolites which were formed from the SATE-esters.

Results. During transport across Caco-2 monolayers, all esters were extensively degraded as could be concluded from the appearance of the mono-ester and free PMEA in apical as well as basolateral compartments. Incubation of SATE-esters with the monolayers resulted in the formation of two additional metabolites, which were identified as 2-thioethyl-PMEA and its dimerisation product. All ester prodrugs resulted in enhanced transepithelial transport of total PMEA (i.e. the bis-esters and their corresponding metabolites, including PMEA), but significant differences could be observed between the various esters. Transport of total PMEA ranged from 0.4 ± 0.1 % for the bis[S(methyl) ATE]-ester to 15.3 ± 0.9% for the more lipophilic bis[S(phenyl)ATE]-PMEA. A relationship between total transport of the esters and their lipophilicity (as estimated by their octanol/water partition coefficient) was established (r2 = 0.87). Incubation of prodrug esters with homogenates from Caco-2 cells showed large differences in susceptibility of the compounds to esterases, the half-lives of the bis-esters varying from 4.3 ± 0.3 min for the bis[S(phenyl)ATE]-PMEA to 41.5 ± 0.8 min for its methyl analogue. In addition, intracellularly formed PMEA was observed to be further converted by the cells to the diphosphorylated PMEA (PMEApp).

Conclusions. Several SATE-esters of PMEA can be considered as potential alternatives to bis(POM)-PMEA, due to enhanced epithelial transport, sufficient chemical and enzymatic stability and adequate release of PMEA. Toxicological studies as well as in vivo experiments are required in order to further explore the potential of those SATE-esters as prodrugs for oral delivery of PMEA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. Naesens, J. Balzarini, N. Bischofberger, and E. De Clercq. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:22–28 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Naesens, R. Snoeck, G. Andrei, J. Balzarini, J. Neyts, and E. de Clercq. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 8:1–23 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. C. Cundy, J. A. Fishback, J.-P. Shaw, M. L. Lee, K. F. Soike, G. C. Visor, and W. A. Lee. Pharm. Res. 11:839–843 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Balzarini, L. Naesens, J. Slachmuylders, H. Niphuis, I. Rosenberg, A. Holý, H. Schellekens, and E. De Clercq. AIDS 5:21–28 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. C. Cundy and W. A. Lee. Antimicrobs. Agents Chemother. 38:365–368 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. E. Starrett, Jr., D. R. Tortolani, J. Russell, M. J. M. Hitchcock, V. Whiterock, J. C. Martin, and M. M. Mansuri. J. Med. Chem. 37:1857–1864 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.-P. Shaw and K. C. Cundy. Pharm. Res. 10(Suppl.):S294 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Artursson. J. Pharm. Sci. 79(6):476–482 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. L. Audus, R. L. Bartel, I. J. Hildago, and R. T. Borchardt. Pharm. Res. 7:435–451 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. R. Hilgers, R. A. Conradi, and P. S. Burton. Pharm. Res. 7:902–910 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. S. Gan, C. Eads, T. Niederer, A. Bridgers, S. Yanni, P.-H. Hsyu, F. J. Pritchard, and D. Thakker. Drug Develop. Ind. Pharm. 20:615–631 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Annaert, R. Kinget, L. Naesens, E. De Clercq, and P. Augustijns. Pharm. Res. 14:492–496 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. A. Barditch-Crovo, K. C. Cundy, M. Wachsman, J. Toole, H. Burgee, and D. Ebeling. Antiviral Res. 26(3, suppl.):A229, abstract nr. 9 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Benzaria, H. Pélicano, R. Johnson, G. Maury, J.-L. Imbach, A.-M. Aubertin, G. Obert, and G. Gosselin. J. Med. Chem. 39:4958–4965 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Valette, A. Pompon, J.-L. Girardet, L. Cappellacci, P. Franchetti, M. Grifantini, P. La Colla, A.-G. Loi, C. Périgaud, G. Gosselin, and J.-L. Imbach. J. Med. Chem. 39:1981–1990 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Hatse, E. De Clercq, and J. Balzarini. Mol. Pharmacol. 50:1231–1242 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Pompon I. Lefebvre, J.-L. Imbach, S. Kahn, and D. Farquhar. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 5:91–98 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Farquhar, S. Khan, D. N. Srivasta, and P. P. Saunders. J. Med. Chem. 37:3902–3909 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Lefebvre, C. Périgaud, A. Pompon, A.-M. Aubertin, J.-L. Girardet, A. Kirn, G. Gosselin, and J.-L. Imbach. J. Med. Chem. 38:3941–3950 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. M. Nielsen and H. Bundgaard. Int. J. Pharm. 39:75–85 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Durrer, B. Walther, A. Racciatti, G. Boss, and B. Testa. Pharm. Res. 8:832–839 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. J. Hildago, T. J. Raub, and R. T. Borchardt. Gastroenterology 96:736–49 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Merta, I. Votruba, J. Jindrich, A. Holy, T. Cihlar, I. Rosenberg, M. Otmar, and T. Y. Herve. Biochem. Pharmacol. 44:2067–2077 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Balzarini and E. De Clercq. J. Biol. Chem. 266:8686–8689 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Augustijns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annaert, P., Gosselin, G., Pompon, A. et al. Comparison of the Disposition of Ester Prodrugs of the Antiviral Agent 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine [PMEA] in Caco-2 Monolayers. Pharm Res 15, 239–245 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011914618109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011914618109

Navigation