Skip to main content
Log in

Microcrystalline Cellulose as a Sponge as an Alternative Concept to the Crystallite-Gel Model for Extrusion and Spheronization

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. P. Kleinebudde. The crystallite-gel-model for microcrystalline cellulose in wet-granulation, extrusion, and spheronization. Pharm. Res. 14:804–809 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Ek and J. M. Newton. Microcrystalline cellulose as a sponge as an alternative concept to the crystalline-gel model for extrusion and spheronization. Pharm. Res. 15:509–510 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. E. Fielden, J. M. Newton, P. O'Brien, and R. C. Rowe. Thermal studies on the interaction of water and microcrystalline cellulose. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 40:674–678 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Vonk, C. P. F. Guillaume, J. S. Ramaker, H. Vromans, and N. W. F. Kossen. Growth mechanisms of high-shear pelletisation. Int. J. Pharm. 157:93–102 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Franz and W. Blaschek. Cellulose. In: P. M. Dey, Methods in Plant Biochemistry Vol. 2 Carbohydrates, Academic Press, London San Diego, 1990, pp. 291–332.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cellulose, Microcrystalline. In: European Pharmacopoeia 1997, 3rd Edition, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 1996, pp. 574–575.

  7. M. Baehr and C. Führer. Untersuchungen zur kolloid-kristallographischen Struktur von Pulvercellulosen. Pharmazie 44:473–476 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. W. Wallace. Cellulose Derivatives and Natural Products Utilized in Pharmaceuticals. In: J. Swarbrick and J. C. Boylan (eds.), Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology Vol. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, 1990, pp. 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Jerwanska, G. Alderborn, J. M. Newton, and C. Nyström. The effect of water content on the porosity and liquid saturation of extruded cylinders. Int. J. Pharm. 121:65–71 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. E. O'Connor, J. Holinej, and J. B. Schwartz. Spheronization I: Processing and evaluation of spheres prepared from commercially available excipients. Am. J. Pharm. 156:80–87 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. M. Newton, A. K. Chow, and K. B. Jeewa. The effect of excipient source on spherical granules made by extrusion/spheronization. Pharm. Tech. Int. 4 (Oct):52–58 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. A. Hileman, S. R. Goskonda, A. J. Spalitto, and S. M. Upadrashta. Response surface optimization of high dose pellets by extrusion and spheronization. Int. J. Pharm. 100:71–79 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. R. Goskonda, G. A. Hileman, and S. M. Upadrashta. Controlled release pellets by extrusion-spheronization. Int. J. Pharm. 111:89–97 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. P. Millilli, R. J. Wigent, and J. B. Schwartz. Differences in the mechanical strength of dried microcrystalline cellulose pellets are not due to significant changes in the degree of hydrogen bonding. Pharm. Dev. Tech. 1:239–249 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Krässig. Structure of cellulose and its relation to properties of cellulose fibres. In: J. F. Kennedy, G. O. Phillips, and P. A. Williams, Cellulose and its derivatives. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1985, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Kleinebudde. Shrinking and swelling properties of pellets containing microcrystalline cellulose and low substituted hydroxypropylcellulose: I. Shrinking properties. Int. J. Pharm. 109:209–219 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Kleinebudde, A. J. Sølvberg, and H. Lindner. The power-consumption-controlled extruder: A tool for pellet production. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 46:542–546 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Baert, J. P. Remon, P. Knight, and J. M. Newton. A comparison between the extrusion forces and sphere quality of a gravity feed extruder and a ram extruder. Int. J. Pharm. 86:187–192 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Schmidt, H. Lindner, and P. Kleinebudde. Comparison between a twin-screw extruder and a rotary ring die press. I. Influence of formulation variables. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 44:169–176 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ek, R., Newton, J. Microcrystalline Cellulose as a Sponge as an Alternative Concept to the Crystallite-Gel Model for Extrusion and Spheronization. Pharm Res 15, 509–512 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011905222168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011905222168

Keywords

Navigation