Skip to main content
Log in

Information Collection Strategic Design in Experts-assisted Decision Making Paradigm

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an experts-assisted decision making paradigm, the information collection design becomes a strategic variable under a weak assumption that the final decision is dependent on the design used to collect information as well. As a result, the same information of the experts and the decision maker about the problem can potentially produce different final decisions for different information collection designs. The implication is that a decision maker can strategically select a design which serves his/her objective. This paper uses a Bayesian estimation methodology for combining experts' information with the decision maker's prior. An information collection process is designed by setting constraints on this model. Several designs are developed here using such controlled factors as a one-stage versus a two-stage decision process, experts' rank ordering, and group versus individual lobbying/consultation. An example is provided to illustrate the applicability of the concept. It is shown that the information produced in the process of producing a decision can also give insights into the impacts of the decision maker and the experts on the decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Heath, C., and R. Gonzalez. (1995). “Interaction with Others Increases Decision Confidence but Not Decision Quality: Evidence against Information Collection Views of Interactive Decision Making, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61(3), March, 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (1986). “Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 1141–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, E. T. (1959). Information Theory and Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. A. (1977). “Combining Experts Judgments: A Bayesian Approach, ” Management Science 23, 679–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostaghimi, M. (1997). “Bayesian Estimation of a Decision Using Information Theory, ” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 27(4), 506–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). “A Mathematical Theory of Communication, ” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, J. A., and T. Buckley. (1995). “Cueing and Cognitive Conflict in Judge-Advisor Decision Making, ” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62(2), May, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R. L. 1981. “Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources, ” Management Science 27, 479–488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mostaghimi, M. Information Collection Strategic Design in Experts-assisted Decision Making Paradigm. Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 375–388 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011884222444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011884222444

Navigation