Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 10, Issue 9, pp 1419–1472 | Cite as

Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Québec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis

  • H. Sarakinos
  • A.O. Nicholls
  • A. Tubert
  • A. Aggarwal
  • C.R. Margules
  • S. Sarkar
Article

Abstract

Results are presented which prioritize areas for potential protection in Québec on the basis of biodiversity considerations. These results are relevant to the ongoing public discussion in Québec about designating new parks and refuges so that the province may fulfil its obligations to Canada's Endangered Spaces Campaign. The prioritization algorithm used in this analysis is based on rarity and complementarity. It attempts to sample biodiversity in as area-efficient a way as possible. The biodiversity surrogates used here comprise a subset of 743 species for which data on spatial distributions are publicly available; the analysis begins with 394 species at risk. It is shown that: (i) the existing network of protected areas in Québec does a poor job of protecting these biodiversity surrogates; (ii) adding adjacent areas to this network will not be the optimal way of protecting these biodiversity surrogates; (iii) many of the areas that have highest priority are in southern Québec, which has a high human population density; (iv) because of (iii), designating parks may not be economically or sociologically feasible and more adaptive alternative conservation plans will have to be devised; (v) coastal areas, riparian habitats, and other wetlands should have high priority for protection but are currently very inadequately represented in the reserve network; (vi) there is some reason for concern about the clear-cut logging of boreal forests in northern Québec; and (vii) the islands, Île d'Anticosti and the Îles-de-la-Madeleine, emerge as being of very significant conservation value and plans for the protection of areas on them should be an immediate goal for biodiversity conservation in Québec.

area prioritization area selection Québec reserve design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackery PR and Vane-Wright RI (1984) Milkweed Butterflies. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology 63: 215-244Google Scholar
  2. Fournier D and Deschamps D (1997a) Rapport technique: pê ches expérimentales dans le fleuve Saint-Laurent prè s de Québec: campagnes d'échantillonnage 1972-1975 et 1991-1992. Technical Report, May 1997. Ministè re de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la Faune et des Habitats, Québec CityGoogle Scholar
  3. Fournier D, Cotton F, Mailhot Y, Bourbeau D, Leclerc J and Dumont P (1996) Rapport d'opération du réseau de suivi ichtyologiques du Fleuve St. Laurent: échantillonage des communautés ichtylogiques des habitats lentiques du Lac St. Pierre et de son archipel en 1995. Technical Report, November 1996. Ministè re de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la Faune et des Habitats, Québec CityGoogle Scholar
  4. Fournier D, Mailhot Y and Bourbeau D (1997b) Rapport d'opération du réseau de suivi ichtyologiques du Fleuve St. Laurent: échantillonage des communautés ichtylogiques du tronç on Gentilly-Batiscan en 1996. Technical Report, July 1997. Ministè re de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la Faune et des Habitats, Québec CityGoogle Scholar
  5. Fournier D, Leclerc J, Dumont P and Bélanger B (1997c) Rapport d'opération du réseau de suivi ichtyologiques du Fleuve St. Laurent: échantillonage des communautés ichtylogiques du Lac St. Franç ois en 1996. Technical Report, August 1997. Ministè re de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la Faune et des Habitats, Québec CityGoogle Scholar
  6. Fournier D, Leclerc J, Bélanger B and Dumont P (1998a) Rapport d'opération du réseau de suivi ichtyologiques du Fleuve St. Laurent: échantillonage des communautés ichtylogiques du Lac St. Louis en 1997. Technical Report, March 1998. Ministè re de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la Faune et des Habitats, Québec CityGoogle Scholar
  7. Fournier D, Mailhot Y and Bourbeau D (1998b) Rapport d'opération du réseau de suivi ichtyologiques du Fleuve St. Laurent: échantillonage des communautés ichtylogiques du Lac St. Pierre en 1997. Technical Report, March 1998. Ministè re de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la Faune et des Habitats, Québec CityGoogle Scholar
  8. Gauthier J and Aubry Y (eds) (1996) The Breeding Birds of Quebec: Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Southern Quebec. Association quebecoise des groups ornithologues, Province of Quebec Society for the Protection of Birds, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Quebec Region, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  9. Hummel M (ed) (1995) Protecting Canada's Endangered Spaces. Key Porter Books, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  10. Kavanagh K, Noss R and Iaconelli T (1995) Building the ark: the science behind the selection of protected areas. In: Hummel M (ed) Protecting Canada's Endangered Spaces, pp 2-8. Key Porter Books, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirkpatrick JB (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25: 127-134Google Scholar
  12. Kirkpatrick JB and Brown MJ (1994) A comparison of direct and environmental domain approaches to planning reservation of forest higher plant communities and species in Tasmania. Conservation Biology 8: 136-146Google Scholar
  13. Margules CR, Nicholls AO and Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43: 63-76Google Scholar
  14. Margules CR, Redhead TD, Hutchinson MF and Faith DP (1995) BioRap: Guidelines for Using the BioRap Methodology and Tools. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  15. MEF [Ministè re de l'Environnement et Faune] (1996) Convention on Biological Diversity: Implementation Strategy. Gouvernement du Québec, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  16. Mongeau JR, Courtemanche A, Massé G and Vincent B (1974) Cartes de répartition géographique des espè ces de poissons au sud du Québec, d'aprè s les inventaires ichtyologiques effectués de 1963 à 1972. Technical Report, November 1974. Service de l'Aménagement de la Faune, Direction de la Chasse et de la Peche, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicholls AO and Margules CR (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation 64: 165-169Google Scholar
  18. Pressey RL (1994) Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conservation Biology 8: 662-668Google Scholar
  19. Rebelo AG and Siegfried WR (1990) Where should nature reserves be located in the cape floristic region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Conservation Biology 6: 243-252Google Scholar
  20. Thibault MH (1995) Le Québec statistique-1995. Bureau de la statistique du Québec, Ste.-Foy Vrijenhoek R (1995) Natural processes, individuals, and the units of conservation. In: Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens EF and Maple TL (eds) Ethics on the Ark, pp. 74-92. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. WCED [World Commission on Environment and Development] (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams P (1998) Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In: Mace GM, Balmford A and Ginsberg JR (eds) Conservation in a Changing World, pp 211-249. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams P, Gibbons D, Margules C, Rebello A, Humphries C and Pressey R (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10: 155-174Google Scholar
  24. WWF [World Wildlife Fund (Canada)] (1999) Press Release, 21 September 1999. World Wildlife Fund Canada, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  25. WWF-UQCN [World Wildlife Fund, Bureau de Québec-Union québécoise pour la conservation de la nature] (1998) Les milieux naturels du Québec méridional: Premiére approximation. WWF-UQCN, Montréal and QuébecGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Sarakinos
    • 1
  • A.O. Nicholls
    • 2
  • A. Tubert
    • 3
  • A. Aggarwal
    • 4
  • C.R. Margules
    • 2
  • S. Sarkar
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  2. 2.CSIRO Wildlife and EcologyCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  4. 4.Program in the History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  5. 5.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  6. 6.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  7. 7.Program in the History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations