Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Price Scissors, Rationing, and Coercion: An Extended Framework for Understanding Primitive Socialist Accumulation

  • Published:
Economics of Planning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper re-examines the current debate on price scissors based on an extended framework, in which the production and trade of industrial consumer goods within the rural sector is incorporated. It confirms that in the economy considered by Preobrazhensky, consumer rationing, especially of industrial goods in rural areas, is prevalent. Under the binding rationing the price response of agricultural surplus cannot be determined theoretically. This finding reopens the field for empirical investigation. The paper identifies the conditions that guarantee the validity of Preobrazhenshy's two propositions: (1) the state can increase its capital accumulation by moving the terms of trade against peasants, and (2) the urban workers need not necessarily suffer therefrom. It demonstrates that in order to ensure the validity of these two propositions, besides the need to assume positive price response of agricultural surplus and of labour force input, food rationing in urban areas and the rationing of major industrial consumer goods in rural areas are essentially required. As a consequence, the paper suggests that the price-scissors type of regulation would induce the state's coercion on peasants to collect their food surplus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antel, J. and Gregory, P. (1994), ‘Agricultural surplus models and peasant behaviour: Soviet agriculture in the 1920s’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 42(2), 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J.-M. (1993), ‘The economics of price scissors: A defence of Preobrazhensky’, European Economic Review 37(1), 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykov, A. (1946), The Development of the Soviet Economic System, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J.-P. (1982), The Economics of Market Disequilibrium, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, A.G. (1986), ‘The economics of price scissors: Comment’, American Economic Review 76(5), 1188–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.S. and Koont, S. (1995), ‘Class struggle, price scissors and socialist industrialization’, Economic System 19(3), 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. and Davies, R.W. (1969- 71), Foundations of a Planned Economy, 2 vols., London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M.P. (1986), ‘The economics of price scissors: Comment’, American Economic Review 76(5), 1192–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, L.-J. and Kim, Y.-H. (eds) (1995), Economic Systems in South and North Korea: The Agenda for Economic Integration, Seoul, Korea Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.F. (1973), Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution: A Political Biography, 1888–1938, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive Statistics of China's Rural Economy, 1989 (in Chinese), Beijing, Agriculture Press.

  • Erlich, A. (1960), The Soviet Industrialization Debate, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. (1990), Rebellion and Functionalism in a Chinese Province: Zhejiang, 1966- 1976, Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak, S. and Ingersent, K. (1984),Agriculture and Economic Development, Brighton, The Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, P. and Stuart, R. (1990), Soviet Economic Structure and Performance, 4th edn., New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han A. (1991), ‘Shortage and coupons’, Chinese Economic Studies 24(4), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, S. (1988), ‘Patterns and processes of intersectoral resource flows: Comparison of cases in Asia’, in G. Ranis and T.P. Schultz, eds., The State of Development Economics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karshenas, M. (1995), Industrialization and Agricultural Surplus: A Comparative Study of Economic Development in Asia, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1995), ‘Price scissors and intersectoral resource transfers: Who paid for industrialization in China’, Oxford Economic Papers 47, 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1992), The Socialist System, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, W. (1982), Economic Development and Social Change in the People's Republic of China, New York, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuromiya, H. (1988), Stalin's Industrial Revolution: Politics and Workers, 1928- 1932, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardy, N. R. (1983), Agriculture in China's Modern Economic Development, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. (1993), ‘Government procurement price and agricultural supply response: Theory and empirical evidence from China’, typescript. Peking University, Beijing and Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y., Cai, F. and Li, Z. (1996), The China Miracle: Development Strategy and Economic Reform, Hong Kong, The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagane, K. (1989), ‘Intersectoral resource flows in China revisited:Who provided industrialization funds?’ Developing Economies 27(2), 146–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nove, A. (1965), ‘Introduction’, in E. Preobrazhensky, ed. The New Economics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nove, A. (1969), An Economic History of the U.S.S.R., London, Allen Lane The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parris, K. (1993), ‘Local initiative and national reform: TheWenzhou Model of development’, China Quarterly 134, 242–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (ed.) (1977), Rural Small-Scale Industry in the People's Republic of China, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preobrazhensky, E. (1965), The New Economics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preobrazhensky, E. (1980), The Crisis of Soviet Industrialization: Selected Essays, London, The MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y. (1994), ‘The theory of shortage in socialist economies based on the “soft budget constraint”’, American Economic Review 84(1), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, C. (1978), ‘China's rural industry: Self-reliant systems of independent kingdoms’, The China Quarterly 73, 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R.K. and Stiglitz, J. (1984), ‘The economics of price scissors’, American Economic Review 74(1), 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R.K. and Stiglitz J. (1986), ‘The economics of price scissors: Reply’, American Economic Review 76(5), 1195–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R.K. and Stiglitz, J. (1992), Peasants versus City-Dwellers: Taxation and the Burden of Economic Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.W. (1964), Transforming Traditional Agriculture,New Haven, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, Y. (1993a), Intersectoral Resource Flows and China's Economic Development, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, Y. (1993b), ‘The capital sources of China's industrialization’, Developing Economies 31, 173–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Yearbook of China, 1993 (Chinese version), Beijing, China Statistics Press.

  • Statistical Yearbook of Rural China, 1993, (Chinese version), Beijing, China Statistics Press.

  • Statistics on Fixed Investment in China: 1950–1985 (in Chinese), Beijing, China Statistics Press, 1987.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. and Weiss, A. (1981), ‘Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information’, American Economic Review 71(3), 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarup, R. (1954), Communism and Peasantry, Calcutta, Prachi Prakashan. Voprosy istorii KPSS (a Russian periodical).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer, C. (1994), ‘State policy and rural resource allocation in China as seen through a Hebei Province township’, World Development 22(6), 935–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, L. Price Scissors, Rationing, and Coercion: An Extended Framework for Understanding Primitive Socialist Accumulation. Economics of Planning 34, 195–213 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011871120813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011871120813

Navigation