Skip to main content
Log in

The Conservation Status of Hypogean Fishes

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypogean fishes are susceptible to five main threats: habitat degradation, hydrological manipulations, environmental pollution, overexploitation, and introduced alien species. Because they are endemic to small areas and have small populations, any threat could have serious consequences. For these reasons most populations have been considered ‘threatened’ or ‘vulnerable’. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, and Natural Resources has produced five Red Lists of threatened animals since 1977 and have listed seven, eight, 31, 31 and 63 hypogean fishes, respectively, in some threat category. Before 1994 the categories were qualitative and workers could assess the same species in different ways. In 1994, a new set of quantitative categories were published. The 1996 list was the first to use these categories and three hypogean species were listed critically endangered, two endangered, 46 vulnerable and 12 data deficient. Some of these categories are incorrect or inappropriate and most of the data deficient ones can now be categorised. All 85 known species are categorised here and reasons given for their placements. The current list has three critically endangered, none endangered, 73 vulnerable, four near threatened, one least concern and four data deficient. Some species are relatively well known, others are poorly known. Some are receiving conservation attention, most receive none. A few captive populations have been established, some of which are breeding. Few populations could be restocked if extirpated. Knowing where to direct conservation efforts is a problem since morphological ‘species’ are proving to be from more than one epigean invasion and therefore represent more than one species. Hypogean fishes merit protection but they may not receive more than cursory protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. 1979. Cave fish. Baham. Nat. 4: 22.

  • Banister, K.E., J. Bell & M. Crumpler. 1992. Omani blind cave fish. Aquar. Pondk. (July): 38–40.

  • Borowsky, R.B. & L. Mertz. 2001. Genetic differentiation among populations of the cave fish Schistura oedipus (Cypriniformes: Balitoridae). Env. Biol. Fish. 62: 225–231 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.V. & C.S. Todd. 1987. Status review of the threatened Ozark cavefish (Amblyopsis rosae). Proc. Ark. Acad. Sci. 41: 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, M.N. 1995a. Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 43: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, M.N. 1995b. Threatened fishes of the world: Clarias cavernicola Trewavas, 1936 (Clariidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 43: 162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad, B.W. 1996. Threatened fishes of the world: Iranocypris typhlops Bruun & Kaiser, 1944 (Cyprinidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 46: 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.E. & D.P. Beiter. 1972. The southern cavefish, Typhlichthys subterraneus (Pisces, Amblyopsidae) in the eastern Mississippian plateau of Kentucky. Copeia 1972: 879–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, G., J. Aguirre, D. Kraemer & E. Craviota. 1980. Bacterial contamination of the limestone aquifer beneath Merida, Mexico. pp. 341–345. In: R.E. Jackson (ed.), Aquifer Contamination and Protection, Project 8.3 of the International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO.

  • Culver, D.C. 1986. Cave faunas. pp. 427–442. In: M. Soule (ed.) Conservation Biology, The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, S. 1985. The flora and fauna of Sagittarius, an anchialine cave and lake in Grand Bahama. Cave Sci. 12: 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R.J., G. Longley, R. Moss, J. Ward, R. Matthews & B. Stewart. 1989. A classification of Texas aquatic communities with special consideration toward the conservation of endangered and threatened taxa. Texas J. Sci. 41: 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, W.R. 2000. Conservation of the North American cave and karst biota. pp. 665–689. In: H. Wilkens, D.C. Culver & W.F. Humphreys (ed.) Ecosystems of the World, Vol. 30, Subterranean Ecosystems, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercolini, A., R. Berti, L. Chelazzi & G. Messana. 1982. Researches on the phreatobitic fishes of Somalia: achievements and prospects. Moni. Zool. Ital. (Suppl.) 17: 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. & G.K. Heilig. 1997. Population momentum and the demand on land and water resources. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 352: 869–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S.V., P. Chapman, D. Checkley, S. Hurd, M. McHale, G.S. Ramangasan, J.E. Randraimasy, P. Stewart, R. Walters & J.M. Wilson. 1989. Survey and management proposals for a tropical deciduous forest reserve at Ankarana in northern Madagascar. Biol. Conserv. 47: 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, W.F. (ed.) 1993. The biogeography of Cape Range, Western Australia. Records of theWestern Australian Museum (Suppl.) 45: 1–248.

  • Humphreys, W.F. 1997. Protection of arid karstlands on the Cape Range peninsula, Western Australia. pp. 28–32. In: I.D. Sasowsky, D.W. Fong & E.L. White (ed.) Conservation and Protection of the Biota of Karst, Karst Waters Institute Special Publication 3, Charles Town.

  • Humphreys, W.F. 1999. The distribution of Australian cave fishes. Rec. West. Austr. Mus. 19: 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, W.F. & M. Adams. 1991. The subterranean aquatic fauna of the North West Cape peninsula, Western Australia. Rec. West. Austr. Mus. 15: 383–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, G.N. 1995. Legal protection for caves in the United States. Environ. Geol. 26: 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1988. 1998 IUCN Red list of threatened animals. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland. 154 pp.

  • IUCN. 1990. The IUCN Red list of threatened animals. IUCN – The World Conservation Union, Gland. 192 pp.

  • IUCN. 1993. 1994 IUCN Red list of threatened animals. IUCN, Gland. 286 pp.

  • IUCN. 1994. IUCN Red list categories. IUCN, Gland. 21 pp.

  • IUCN. 1996. 1996 IUCN Red list of threatened animals. IUCN, Gland. 368 pp.

  • IUCN/SSC Criteria Review Working Group. 1999. IUCN Red List criteria review provisional report: draft of the proposed changes and recommendations. Species (31–32): 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, J.H. 1988. Distribution of northern cavefish, Amblyopsis spelaea DeKay, in Indiana andKentucky and recommendations for its protection. Nat. Areas J. 8: 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langecker, T., H. Wilkens & P. Junge. 1991. Introgressive hybridisation in the Pachon Cave population of Astyanax fasciatus (Teleostei, Characidae). Ichth. Explor. Freshw. 2: 209–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langecker, T.G. & G. Longley. 1993. Morphological adaptations of the Texas blind catfishesTrogloglanis pattersoni and Satan eurystomus (Siluriformes, Ictaluridae) to their underground environment. Copeia 1993: 976–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langecker, T.G., H. Wilkens & J. Parzefall. 1996. Studies on the trophic structure of an energy-rich Mexican cave (Cueva de las Sardinas) containing sulphurous water. Mem. Biospel. 23: 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J.H. & R.M. May (ed.) 1995. Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 233 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisowski, E.A. & T.L. Poulson. 1981. Impacts of lock and dam six on base level ecosystems in Mammoth Cave. Cave Res. Found. Ann. Rept.: 48–54.

  • Means, M. & J.E. Johnson. 1995. Movement of threatened Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave national wildlife refuge, Arkansas. Southw. Nat. 40: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina-González, R., G. Proudlove, L. Chumba-Segura & T. Iliffe. 2001. Threatened fishes of the world: Ophisternon infernale (Hubbs, 1938) (Synbranchidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 62: 170 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R.R. 1977. IUCN Red Data Book 4, Freshwater fishes. IUCN, Gland. 77 pp.

  • Mitchell, R.W., W.H. Russell & W.R. Elliott. 1977. Mexican eyeless characin fishes, genus Astyanax: environment, distribution and evolution. Sp. Publ. Mus. Tex. Tech. Univ. (12): 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylroie, J. & H. Tronvig. 1998. KarstWaters Institute creates top ten list of endangered karst ecosystems. Nat. Spel. Soc. News 56: 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Caving Association. 1997. Cave conservation handbook. National Caving Association, London (various paging).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1992. TheMammothCave ecosystem. pp. 569–611. In: A.I. Camacho (ed.) The Natural History of Biospeleology, Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudlove, G.S. 1984. Preliminary observations on the biology of inland Blue Holes, Andros Island, Bahamas. Cave Sci. 11: 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudlove, G.S. & A. Romero. 2001. Threatened fishes of the world: Caecobarbus geertsii Boulenger, 1921 (Cyprinidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 62: 238 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudlove, G., R. Medina-González, L. Chumba-Segura & T. Iliffe. 2001. Threatened fishes of the world: Ogilibia pearsei (Hubbs, 1938) (Bythitidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 62: 214 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quammen, D. 1996. The song of the dodo. Island biogeography in an age of extinctions. Pimlico, London. 702 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. 1983. Introgressive hybridisation in the Astyanax fasciatus (Pisces, Characidae) population at La Cueva Chica. Bull. Nat. Spel. Soc. 45: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. 1998a. Threatened fishes of the world: Amblyopsis rosae (Eigenmann, 1898) (Amblyopsidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 52: 434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. 1998b. Threatened fishes of the world: Speoplatyrhinus poulsoni Cooper & Kuehne, 1974 (Amblyopsidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 53: 293–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. & L. Bennis. 1998. Threatened fishes of the world: Amblyopsis spelaea DeKay, 1842 (Amblyopsidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 51: 420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. & P.B.S. Vanselow. 2000a. Threatened fishes of the world: Milyeringa veritas Whitley, 1945 (Eleotridae). Env. Biol. Fish. 57: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. & P.B.S. Vanselow. 2000b. Threatened fishes of the world: Ophisternon candidum (Mees, 1962) (Synbranchidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 58: 214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. & A. McLeran. 2000. Threatened fishes of the world: Stygichthys typhlops Brittan & Bohlke, 1965 (Characidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 57: 270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbordoni, M.C., E. Dematthaeis, M. Mattoccia, R. Berti & V. Sbordoni. 1996. Genetic variability and differentiation of hypogean cyprinid fishes from Somalia. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 34: 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, P.H. 1990. The status of fishes from sinkholes and caves in Namibia. Namibia Scient. Soc. J. 42: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tercafs, R. 1992. The protection of the subterranean environment. Conservation principles and management tools. pp. 481–524. In: A.I. Camacho (ed.), The Natural History of Biospeleology, Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajano, E. 1991. Population ecology of Pimelodella kronei, troglobitic catfish from south-eastern Brazil (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 30: 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajano, E. 1997. Threatened fishes of the world: Pimelodella kronei (Ribeiro, 1907) (Pimelodidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 49: 332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronvig, K. & C. Belson. 1999. Karst Waters Institute's second annual top ten list of endangered karst ecosystems. Nat. Spel. Soc. News 57: 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandike, J.E. 1984. Hydrogeologic aspects of the November 1981 liquid fertiliser pipeline break on groundwater in the Meramec Spring recharge area, Phelps County, Missouri. In: Proceedings of the 1984 National Cave Management Symposium, Missouri Speleology 25: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorosmarty, C.J., P. Green, J. Salisbury & R.B. Lammers. 2000. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289: 284–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, E., O. Barros & S. Jimenez. 1980. The effects of sugarwaste disposal on a karstic limestone aquifer. pp. 329–339. In: R.E. Jackson (ed.) Aquifer Contamination and Protection, Project 8.3 of the International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S.J. 2000. Conservation of aquatic karst biotas: shedding light on troubled waters, essay 15. pp. 106–108. In: R.A. Abell, D.M. Olson, E. Dinerstein, P.T. Hurley, J.T. Diggs, W. Eichbaum, S. Walters, W. Wettengel, T. Allnutt, C.J. Loucks & P. Hedao (ed.) Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, L.H. & V. Walters. 1965. Laboratory observations on a cavernicolous poeciliid from Tabasco, Mexico. Copeia 1965: 214–223.

  • Watson, J., E. Hamilton-Smith, D. Gillieson & K. Kiernan (ed.) 1997. Guidelines for cave and karst protection. IUCN, Gland. 63 pp.

  • Wilkens, H. 1988. Evolution and genetics of epigean and cave Astyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces): support for the neutral mutation theory. Evol. Biol. 23: 271–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.D. & A.V. Brown. 1985. Distribution and habitat requirements of the Ozark cavefish, Amblyopsis rosae. Amer. Midl. Nat. 114: 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.M. 1996. Conservation and ecology of a new blind fish Glossogobius ankaranensis from the Ankarana caves, Madagascar. Oryx 30: 218–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, I.J. & F.N. Robertson. 1982. Deep oxygenated groundwater: anomaly or common occurrence? Science 216: 1227–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, J. 1981. Remipedia, a newclass of crustacea from a marine cave in the Bahamas. J. Crust. Biol. 1: 328–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, J. & D. Williams. 1988. Predation by grey snapper on cave bats in the Bahamas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 43: 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. 1986. Bringing the blind gudgeon into captivity. J. Austr. New Guin. Fishes Ass. 4: 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proudlove, G.S. The Conservation Status of Hypogean Fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 62, 201–213 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011828726038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011828726038

Navigation