Skip to main content
Log in

How Hydrogeology has Shaped the Ecology of Missouri's Ozark Cavefish, Amblyopsis Rosae, and Southern Cavefish, Typhlichthys Subterraneus: Insights on the Sightless from understanding the Underground

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two troglobitic fishes of conservation concern that inhabit Missouri are the Ozark and southern cavefishes, Amblyopsis rosae and Typhlichthys subterraneus, respectively. These species inhabit the groundwater of karstified bedrock in the Springfield and Salem plateau regions of the state, respectively. These two areas differ substantially – geographically, geologically, and hydrologically. This paper explores how these differences interact in shaping (1) the habitat in which these two species dwell, (2) the resulting ecological constraints that the fishes face, (3) how their ecologies and populations reflect these constraints, and (4) how conservation and management efforts may need to be tailored to best compliment the unique challenges that each species presents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamskii, J.C. & A.L. Pugh. 1996. Occurrence of pesticides in ground water of the Ozark Plateaus province.Water Res. Bull. 32: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aley, T. 1978. A predictive hydrologic model for evaluating the effects of land use and management on the quantity and quality of water from Ozark springs. Missouri Speleol. 18: 1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appold, M.S. & G. Garven. 1999. The hydrology of ore formation in southeast Missouri district; numerical models of topographydriven fluid flow during the Ouachita Orogeny. Econ. Geol. 94: 913–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.G. & J.D. Williams. 1971. Cave and spring fishes of the southern bend of the Tennessee River. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 46: 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C.D. 1972. The cephalic lateral line systems of amblyopsid blind cavefishes and other percopsiform fishes (Pisces: Percopsiformes). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville. 113 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E.K. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 32: 821–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, T.C., Jr. & J.R. Holsinger. 1985. Speciation in cave faunas. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechler, D.L. 1980. The evolution of agonistic behavior in amblyopsid fishes. Ph.D. Dissertation, St. Louis University, St. Louis. 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechler, D.L. 1981. Agonistic behavior in the Amblyopsidae, the spring, cave, and swamp fishes. Proc. Int. Cong. Speleol. 8: 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechler, D.L. 1983. The evolution of agonistic behavior in amblyopsid fishes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, D.E. 1997. The phylogeny and historical biogeography of Missouri's Amblyopsis rosae (Ozark cavefish) and Typhlichthys subterraneus (southern cavefish). M.S. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia. 63 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A.L. 1998. Geomorphology: a systematic analysis of late cenozoic landforms. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 482 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, G.L. 1997. Metabolic rates and life history of aquatic organisms inhabiting Logan Cave stream in northwest Arkansas. M.S. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 107 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breder, C.M. Jr. & D.E. Rosen. 1996. Modes of reproduction in fishes. Natural History Press, Garden City. 941 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, J.H. 1953. Genetic relations of caves to peneplains and big springs in the Ozarks. Amer. J. Sci. 251: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.V. & C.S. Todd. 1987. Status review of the threatened Ozark cavefish (Amblyopsis rosae). Proc. Ark. Acad. Sci. 41: 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Z.J. 1996. Population dynamics and growth of Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Benton County, Arkansas. M.S. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 105 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, H.H. 1933. The optic tectum and its related fiber tracts in blind fishes. A. Troglichthys rosae and Typhlichthys eigenmanni. J. Comp. Neurol. 57: 285–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.E. & R.E. Kuehne. 1974. Speoplatyrhinus poulsoni, a new genus and species of subterranean fish from Alabama. Copeia 1974: 486–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crunkilton, R. 1985. Subterranean contamination of Maramec Spring by ammonium nitrate and urea fertilizer and its implication on rare cave biota. Missouri Speleol. 25: 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, D.C. 1982. Cave life: evolution and ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 189 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreiss, S.J. 1989. Regional scale transport in a karst aquifer: 1. Linear systems and time moment analysis. Water Res. Res. 25: 126–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1898. A new blind fish. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 1897: 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1899a. The blind fishes of North America. Pop. Sci. Month. 56: 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1899b. The blind fishes. Biol. Bull. 8: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1899c. A case of convergence. Science 9: 280–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1899d. The eyes of the blind vertebrates of North America. I. The eyes of the Amblyopsidae. Arch. Entwick. Org. 8: 545–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenmann, C.H. 1909. Cave vertebrates of America: a study in degenerative evolution. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication (104): 1–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, B.J. 1994. Geospeleologic analysis of cave and karst development within the Boone and St. Joe formations of Benton and Madison counties, northwest Arkansas. M.S. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 144 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G.L. 1973. A conceptual model of the hydrologic system supplying the large springs in the Ozarks. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia. 149 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D.C. & P.W. Williams. 1989. Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Unwin Hyman Ltd., London. 601 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D.C., S.-E. Lauritzen & R. Ewers. 2000. Hardware and software modeling of initial conduit development in karst rocks. pp. 175–183. In: A.B. Klimchouk, D.C. Ford, A.N. Palmer & W. Dreybrodt (ed.) Speleogenesis: Evolution of Karst Aquifers, National Speleological Society, Huntsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garman, S. 1889. Cave animals from southwestern Missouri. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 17: 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, J.M. & K.L. Shelton. 1989. Minor-and trace-element distributions in the Bonneterre Dolomite (Cambrian), southeast Missouri: evidence for possible multiple-basin fluid sources and pathways during lead–zinc mineralization. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 101: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, E.L., J.L. Schlichenmeyr, K.T. Clemence, G.A. Ulrich, J.M. Suflita, D. Martino & J.W. Ammermon. 1995. Microbial sulfur cycling in a shallow aquifer system. EOS, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 76: F221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, G. 1968. Relation of a chert zone to development of Devils Icebox, Boone County, Missouri. Missouri Speleol. 10: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C.L. & R.M. Bailey. 1947. Blind catfishes from artesian waters of Texas. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 499: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman, J.H. & D.E. Figg. 1995. Genetic estimates of variability and relatedness for conservation of an Ozark cave crayfish species complex. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1288–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langecker, T.G. & G. Longley. 1993a. Morphological adaptations of the Texas blind catfishes Trogloglanis pattersoni and Satan eurystomus(Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) to their underground environment. Copeia 1993: 976–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langecker, T.G. & G. Longley. 1993b. Blind catfish (Trogloglanis pattersoni and Satan eurystomus) from deep artesian waters: a study on convergent adaptation to cave and deep sea biota. pp. 239–255. In: J.H. Schroder, J. Bauer & M. Schartl (ed.) Trends in Ichthyology: An International Perspective, GSF Forschungszentrum f¨ur Umwelt und Gesundheit GmbH, in association with Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, D.L. 1979. Temperature and salinity of the fluids responsible for minor occurrences of sphalerite in the Ozark region of Missouri. Econ. Geol. 74: 931–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, D.L., R.C. Nelson & D. Williams. 1975. Fluid inclusion studies in the northern Arkansas zinc district. Econ. Geol. 70: 1084–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.S., C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister & J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh. 854 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayden, R.L. (ed.). 1992. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford. 969 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayden, R.L. & F.B. Cross. 1983. Re-evaluation of Oklahoma records of the southern cavefish, Typhlichthys subterraneus Girard (Amblyopsidae). Southwest. Nat. 28: 471–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, E.F. Jr. & W.L. Pflieger. 1979. The spring cavefish, Chologaster agassizi(Pisces: Amblyopsidae) in southeastern Missouri. Amer. Midl. Nat. 102: 194–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, M.L. 1993. Population dynamics and movement of Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave NWR, Benton County, Arkansas with additional baseline water quality information. M.S. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 126 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, M.L. & J.E. Johnson. 1995. Movement of threatened Ozark cavefish in Logan Cave National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas. Southwest. Nat. 40: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.J. & H.W. Robison. 1973. The fishes of Oklahoma. Oklahoma State University Press, Stillwater. 246 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, C.E. & T.L. Poulson. 1966. The life of the cave. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York. 232 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneymaker, B.C. & R.F. Rhoades. 1945. Deep solution channel in western Kentucky. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 56: 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. & J.J. Cech, Jr. 2000. Fishes – an introduction to ichthyology, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 612 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.S. 1989/90. Analysis of the multiple occurrence of pelvic fin absence in extant fishes. Matsya (India) 15/16: 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, A.S. Jr. & P.W. Putnam. 1872. The Mammoth Cave and its inhabitants, or descriptions of the fishes, insects and crustaceans found in the cave: with figures of the various species, and an account of allied forms, comprising notes upon their structure, development and habits, with remarks upon subterranean life in general. Naturalists’ Agency, Salem Press, Salem. 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K.N., C.R. Tumlinson & V.R. McDaniel. 1981. A second record of Typhlichthys subterraneus (Pisces: Amblyopsidae) from Arkansas. Southwest. Nat. 26: 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A.N. 1991. Origin and morphology of limestone caves. Bull. Geol. Soc. America 103: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitty, A.F. 1968. Some features of calcium hardness fluctuations in two karst streams and their possible value in geohydrological studies. J. Hydrol. 6: 202–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1958. Cave fishes (Amblyopsidae). The Bloomington Indiana Grotto Newsletter 1: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1960. Cave adaptation in amblyopsid fishes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 185 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1963. Cave adaptation in amblyopsid fishes. Amer. Midl. Nat. 70: 257–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1964. Animals in aquatic environments: animals in caves. pp. 749–771. In: D.B. Dill, E.F. Adolph & C.G. Wilber (ed.) Handbook of Physiology: A Critical, Comprehensive Presentation of Physiological Knowledge and Concepts, Section 4: Adaptation to the Environment, American Physiological Society, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. 1985. Evolutionary reduction by neutral mutations: plausibility arguments and data from amblyopsid fishes and linyphiid spiders. Nat. Speleol. Soc. Bull. 47: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson, T.L. & W.B. White. 1969. The cave environment. Science 165: 971–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reams, M.W. 1968. Cave sediments and the geomorphic history of the Ozarks. Ph.D. Dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis. 113 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, H.W. & T.M. Buchanan 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. The University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville. 536 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roedder, E. 1977. Fluid inclusion studies of the ore deposits of the Viburnum Trend, southeast Missouri. Econ. Geol. 72: 474–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. 1998a. Threatened fishes of the world: Typhlichthys subterraneus (Girard, 1860) (Amblyopsidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 53: 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A. 1998b. Threatened fishes of the world: Amblyopsis rosae (Eigenmann, 1898) (Amblyopsidae). Env. Biol. Fish. 52: 434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. 1995. Endangered, threatened, and special status fishes of North America, 4th ed. American Currents, special issue. North American Native Fishes Association. 77 pp.

  • Schmidt, R.A. 1962. Temperatures of mineral formation in the Miami-Pitcher district as indicated by liquid inclusions. Econ. Geol. 57: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A.L.S., C.D. Nielsen & D.B. Noltie. 1993. Habitat use and gas bubble disease in southern cavefish (Typhlichthys subterraneus). Int. J. Speleol. 22: 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A.L.S. & D.B. Noltie. 1995. Laboratory studies of substrate and microhabitat selection in the southern cave-fish (Typhlichthys subterraneus Girard). Ecol. Freshw. Fish 4: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.J. 1980. Some aspects of the life history of the southern cavefish (Typhlichthys subterraneus Girard) in Missouri. M.S. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia. 123 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttkus, R.D. 1961. Additional information about blind catfishes from Texas. Southwest. Nat. 6: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L., B.A. Branson & G.A. Sievert. 1980. Genetic differentiation of cavefish populations. Isozyme Bull. 13: 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D.T.A. & D.F. Sangster. 1991. Paleomagnetic age of the central Missouri barite deposits and its genetic significance. Econ. Geol. 86: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafanelli, R. & J.E. Russell. 1972. A extension of the range of the blind cavefish Amblyopsis rosae (Eigenmann). Southwest. Nat. 17: 310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ternan, J.L. 1972. Comments on the use of a calcium hardness variability index in the study of carbonate aquifers, with reference to the central Pennines, England. J. Hydrol. 16: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thines, G. 1969. L'Evolution regressive des poissons cavernicoles et abyssaux. Masson et. Cie., Paris. 394 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T.L. 1995. The stratigraphic succession in Missouri. Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Land Survey, volume 40 (2nd series) revised, Columbia. 188 pp.

  • Unklesbay, A.G. & J.D. Vineyard. 1992. Missouri geology: three billions years of volcanoes, seas, sediments, and erosion. University of Missouri Press, Columbia. 189 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandike, J.E. 1985. Hydrogeologic aspects of the November 1981 liquid fertilizer pipeline break on groundwater in the Maramec Spring recharge area, Phelps County, Missouri. Missouri Speleol. 25: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandike, J.E. 1992. The hydrogeology of the Bennett Spring area, Laclede, Dallas,Webster, and Wright counties, Missouri. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Report 38: 1–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandike, J.E. 1993. Groundwater level data for Missouri water year 1991–1992. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey,Water Resources Report 42: 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandike, J.E. 1996. The hydrology of Maramec Spring. Missouri Department of Natural Resources,Water Resources Report 55: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vineyard, J.D. & G.L. Feder. 1982. Springs of Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources, Water Resources Report 29: 1–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples, R.S. 1991. Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of 'species’ under the Endangered Species Act. Mar. Fish. Rev. 53: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples, R.S. 1995. Evolutionary significant units and the conservation of biological diversity Species Act. pp. 8–27. In: J.L. Nielsen & D.A. Powers (ed.) Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, H.D. 1994. Highway and pipeline corridors: risk zones for Missouri caves. Missouri Cave and Karst Conserv. Dig. July: 7–12.

  • Wicks, C.M. 1997. Origins of groundwater in a fluviokarst basin: Bonne Femme basin in central Missouri, USA. Hydrogeol. J. 5: 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, C.M. & B. Bohn. 2000. Application of unit hydrograph technique to the discharge record at Big Spring, Carter County, Missouri. pp. 31–41. In: I.D. Sasowsky & C.M. Wicks (ed.) Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport in Carbonate Aquifers, Balkeman, Rotterdam.

  • Wicks, C.M. & J.A. Hoke. 2000. Prediction of the quality and quantity of Maramec Spring water. Ground Water 38: 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.D. & A.V. Brown. 1985. Distribution and habitat requirements of the Ozark cavefish, Amblyopsis rosae. Amer. Midl. Nat. 114: 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, L.P. & R.F. Inger. 1957. The cave, spring, and swamp fishes of the family Amblyopsidae of central and eastern United States. Amer. Midl. Nat. 58: 232–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noltie, D.B., Wicks, C.M. How Hydrogeology has Shaped the Ecology of Missouri's Ozark Cavefish, Amblyopsis Rosae, and Southern Cavefish, Typhlichthys Subterraneus: Insights on the Sightless from understanding the Underground. Environmental Biology of Fishes 62, 171–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011815806589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011815806589

Navigation