Abstract
Fictional debates between Epicures and Stoics existed in classical antiquity and lived on in the neo-Latin literature of the Renaissance, as in Lorenzo Valla's De Voluptate and Erasmus's Epicureus. Specific parallels suggest that the creator of the picaresque genre knew this tradition. Fifteenth- and sixteenth-century humanists connected Epicureanism with the cult of Bacchus, and the Lazarillo contains several parallels to the Bacchean myth. In the first two books of his dialogue Valla creates an unrestrained Epicure that dwells on the foolishness of Stoics, who condemn their natural urges – though secretly following them – and blame them on Stepmother Nature's blinding influence. The self-serving narrator of the Lazarillo makes a similar claim, and in several ways lives out the recommendations of Valla's voluptuary. Similarly, Erasmus remarks on the etymology of the word 'Epicurean,' which suggests a guide who is a boy or son, and so the proto-pícaro himself. After profiling the disastrous moral slide of the unrepentant who begin sinning in childhood, he praises an unblemished life, spent from youth in ever growing virtuous pleasures. Lazarillo's life and the concluding line of his account may echo that praise in ironic reversal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Alvarez-Altman, G. “Literary Onomastics in Lazarillo de Tormes,” Literary Onomastics Studies 5 (1978): 232–241.
Anon. Lazarillo de Tormes. Ed. Francisco Rico. Madrid: Cátedra, 1987.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De finibus bonorum et malorum. Trans. H. Rackham. London: W. Heinemann, 1921.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. Tusculanae disputationes. Trans. J. E. King. London: Heinemann, 1927.
Colahan, C. and A. Rodriguez. “Juan Maldonado and Lazarillo de Tormes,” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 72 (1995): 289–311.
Colahan, C., A. Rodriguez and W. Smith. “Juan Maldonado's Bacchus and the Young Lazarillo,” Humanistica Lovaniensia: Journal of Neo-Latin Studies (1999): 160–241.
Deyermond, A. D. Lazarillo de Tormes: A Critical Guide. London: Grant & Cutler/Tamesis Books, 1975.
Emmerling-Skala, A. Bacchus in der Renaissance. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1994.
Erasmi, D. R. Colloquia familiaria.... Lipsiae: Ottonis Holtze, 1900.
Erasmi, D. Moriae encomium. http://smith2.sewanee.edu/Erasmus/ME.html
García de la Concha, V. “La intención religiosa de Lazarillo,” Revista de Filología Española 55 (1972): 241–277.
Gilman, S. “The Death of Lazarillo de Tormes,” PMLA 81 (1966): 149–166.
Glare, P. G. W. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1982.
Lázaro Carreter, F. “Construcción y sentido del Lazarillo de Tormes.” Abaco 1 (1969): 45–134.
Malkiel, Y. “La familia léxica lazerar, laz(d)rar, lazeria,” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 6 (1952): 209–276.
Malón de Chaide, P. La conversión de la Madalena, in Escritores del Siglo XVI I, BAE 27. Madrid: Hernando, 1926.
Mormando, Franco. “Lazarus Raised Again,” America 181, no. 19 (Dec. 11, 1999): 11–13
Paar, J. A. “Rhetoric and Referentiality: Historical Allusiveness and Artful Innuendo,” Crítica Hispánica 19 (1997): 75–86.
Reed, H. “Dining with Lazarillo: The Discourse of Pleasure in Lazarillo de Tormes,” Crítica Hispánica 19 (1997): 57–74.
Ricapito, J. V. “Commonality of Thought: Juan Luis Vives and Lazarillo de Tormes,” Crítica Hispánica 19 (1997): 24–40.
Sánchez, A. “Lázaro y su alternativa a la pobreza,” Crítica Hispánica 19 (1997): 141–150.
Shipley, G. “Making the CAse against Lázaro de Tormes,” PMLA 97 (1982): 179–194.
Thompson, C. R., Ed. and Trans. Collected Works of Erasmus: Colloquies. Vol. 40. Toronto: U of Toronto Press, 1997.
Tirado, M. de C. “Parody, Poverty and the Lazarillo de Tormes,” Hispanófila 115 (1995): 1–10.
Valla, L. On Pleasure, De voluptate. Trans. A. K. Hieatt and M. Lorch. Intro. M. de Panizza Lorch. New York: Abaris, 1977.
Wardropper, B. W. “The Strange Case of Lázaro Gonzales Pérez,” MLN 92 (1977): 202–212.
Wiltrout, A. “The Lazarillo de Tormes and Erasmus’ ‘Opulentia Sordida,'” Romanische Forschungen 81: 550–564.
Zappala, Michael. “The Lazarillo: Source - Apuleius or Lucian? - and Recreation,” Hispanófila 97 (1989): 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colahan, C. Epicurean vs. Stoic Debate and Lazarillo's Character. Neophilologus 85, 555–564 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011811504406
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011811504406