Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Scale and Multi-Resolution Stochastic Modeling of Subsurface Heterogeneity by Tree-Indexed Markov Chains

  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new methodology is proposed to handle multi-scale heterogeneous structures. It can be of importance in the field of hydrogeology and for petroleum engineers who are interested in characterizing subsurface heterogeneity at various scales. The framework of this methodology is based on a coarse to fine scale representation of the heterogeneous structures on trees. Different depths in the tree correspond to different spatial scales in representing the heterogeneous structures on trees. On these trees a Markov chain is used to describe scale to scale transitions and to account for the uncertainty in the stochastically generated images.

We focus in this work on the description and application of the methodology to synthetic data that are geologically realistic. The methodology is flexible. Conditioning on field data and measurements is straightforward. Non-stationary and stationary fields, compound and nested structures can be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Bruining, D. van Batenburg, L.W. Lake and An Ping Yang, Flexible spectral methods for the generation of random fields with power-law semivariograms, Math. Geology 29 (1997) 823–848.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.R. Cross and A.K. Jain, Markov random field texture models, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intelligence 5(1) (1983).

  3. F.M. Dekking, C. Kraaikamp and J.G. Schouten, Binary images and inhomogeneous tree-indexed Markov chains, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 44 (1999) 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Deutsch and A. Journel, GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's GuideOxford Univ. Press, New York, 1992).

  5. A.M.M. Elfeki, Stochastic Characterization of Geological Heterogeneity and Its Impact on Groundwater Contaminant Transport, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology (A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.M.M. Elfeki, A hybrid stochastic model for characterisation of subsurface heterogeneity, Mansoura Univ. Engrg. J. 22(3) (1997).

  7. A.M.M. Elfeki and F.M. Dekking, A Markov chain model for subsurface characterization: Theory and applications, to appear in Math. Geology (2001).

  8. A.M.M. Elfeki, F.M. Dekking, J. Bruining and C. Kraaikamp, Influence of the fine scale heterogeneity patterns on large scale behavior of miscible transport in porous media, in: 7th European Conf. on Mathematics of Oil Recovery, EAGE, Baveno, Italy, 25 1–7.

  9. A.M.M. Elfeki, G.J.M. Uffink and F.B.J. Barends, Stochastic simulation of heterogeneous geological formations using soft information, with an application to groundwater, in: Groundwater Quality: Remediation and Protection, QG'95, eds. K. Kovar and Krasny, IAHS Publication 225 (1995).

  10. A.M.M. Elfeki, G.J.M. Uffink and F.B.J. Barends, A coupled Markov chain model for quantification of uncertainty in transport in heterogeneous formations, in: GeoENV'98, 2nd European Conf. on Geostatistics for Environmental Applications, Valencia, Spain, eds. A. Soares and J. Hernandez (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Haldorsen and E. Damsleth, Stochastic modelling. J. Petroleum Technology 42(4) (1990) 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.W.D. Killy and G.L. Moltyaner, Twin lake tracer test: Methods and permeabilities,Water Resources Res. 24(10) (1988) 1585–1613.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.P. Neuman, in: Recent Trends in Hydrogeology, ed. T.N. Narasimhan, Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Amer. 189 (Boulder, Colorado, 1980) 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Samet, Applications of Spatial Data Structures(Addison-Wesely, Reading, MA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.L. van Beek and E.A. Koster, Fluvial and estuarine sediments exposed along the Oude Maas (The Netherlands), Sedimentology 19 (1972) 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Vanmarcke, Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.J. Weber, How heterogeneity affects oil recovery, in: Resevoir Characterization, eds. L.W. Lake and H.G. Carroll, Jr. (Academic Press, New York, 1986) 487–544.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Yarus and R. Chambers, Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistics Principle, Methods and Case Studies, AAPG Computer Applications in Geology 3 (Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, 1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekking, M., Elfeki, A., Kraaikamp, C. et al. Multi-Scale and Multi-Resolution Stochastic Modeling of Subsurface Heterogeneity by Tree-Indexed Markov Chains. Computational Geosciences 5, 47–60 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011610003277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011610003277

Navigation