Brain and Mind

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 307–325 | Cite as

Evolutionary Psychology, Meet Developmental Neurobiology: Against Promiscuous Modularity

  • David J. Buller
  • Valerie Hardcastle
Article

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists claim that the mind contains “hundreds or thousands” of “genetically specified” modules, which are evolutionary adaptations for their cognitive functions. We argue that, while the adult human mind/brain typically contains a degree of modularization, its “modules” are neither genetically specified nor evolutionary adaptations. Rather, they result from the brain's developmental plasticity, which allows environmental task demands a large role in shaping the brain's information-processing structures. The brain's developmental plasticity is our fundamental psychological adaptation, and the “modules” that result from it are adaptive responses to local conditions, not past evolutionary environments. If different individuals share common environments, however, they may develop similar “modules,” and this process can mimic the development of genetically specified modules in the evolutionary psychologist's sense.

adaptation brain development domain specificity evolutionary psychology modularity plasticity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banton, T., and Bertenthal, B.I., 1997: Multiple developmental pathways for motion processing. Optometry and Visual Science 74, 751–760.Google Scholar
  2. Berthoz, A., 1988: The role of gaze compensation of vestibular disfunction: The gaze substitution hypothesis. In O. Pompeiana and J.H.J. (eds), Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 76. Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 411–420.Google Scholar
  3. Brandon, R.N., 1990: Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buller, D.J., 1993: Confirmation and the computational paradigm (or: Why do you think they call it artificial intelligence?). Minds and Machines 3, 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D.M., 1995: Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry 6, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Changeux, J.-P., and Danchin, A., 1976: Selective stabilization of developing synapses as a mechanism for the specification of neural networks. Nature 264, 705–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, S.A., Allard, T., Jenkins, W.M., and Merzenich, M.M., 1988: Receptive fields in the bodysurface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs. Nature 332, 444–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, W.R., 1995: At War Within: The Double-edged Sword of Immunity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cosmides, L., 1989: The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31, 187–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., 1987: From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In J. Dupré(ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 277–306.Google Scholar
  11. Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., 1994: Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S.A. Gelman (eds), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–116.Google Scholar
  12. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J., 1997: The modular nature of human intelligence. In A.B. Scheibel & J.W. Schopf (eds), The Origin and Evolution of Intelligence, Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, pp. 71–101.Google Scholar
  13. Cramer, K.S., and Sur, M., 1995: Activity-dependent remodeling of connections in the mammalian visual system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 5, 106–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deacon, T.W., 1997: The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. NewYork: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  15. de Chadarevian, S., 1998: Of worms and programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the study of development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29(1), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doetsch, G.S., Massey, C.E., Wilson, B.T., and Kelahan, A.M., 1983: Time-dependent functional changes in somatosensory cerebral cortex following digit amputation in adult raccoons. Journal of Comparative Neurology.Google Scholar
  17. Dostrovsky, J.O., Millar, J., and Wall, P.D., 1976: The immediate shift of afferent drive of dorsal column nucleus cells following deafferentation: A comparison of acute and chronic deafferentation in gracile nucleus and spinal cord. Experimental Neurology 52, 480–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edelman, G.M., 1992: right Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Endler, J.A., 1986: Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fodor, J., 1983: The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fodor, J., 2000: The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Futuyma, D.J., 1998: Evolutionary Biology(3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Gerhart, J. and Kirschner, M., 1997: Cells, Embryos, and Evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  24. Gierer, A., and Muller, C.M., 1995: Development of layers, maps, and modules. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 5, 91–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godfrey-Smith, P., 1999: Genes and codes: Lessons from the philosophy of mind? In V. G. Hardcastle (ed.), Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 305–331.Google Scholar
  26. Godfrey-Smith, P., 2000: On the theoretical role of “genetic coding. ” Philosophy of Science 67, 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldman-Rakic, P.S., Isseroff, M., Schwartz, M., and Bugbee, N., 1983: The neurobiology of child development. In F. Plum and V. Mountcastle (eds), The Handbook of Child Development. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, pp. 282–331.Google Scholar
  28. Gould, E., Reeves, A.J., Graziano, M.S.A., and Gross, C.G., 1999: Neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult primates. Science 286, 548–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardcastle, V.G., 1995: Locating Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.Google Scholar
  30. Innocenti, G.M., 1995: Exuberant development of connections, and its possible permissive role in cortical evolution. Trends in Neuroscience 18, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katz, L.C., and Shatz, C.J., 1996: Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274, 1133–1138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macalusao, E., Frith, C.D., and Driver, J., 2000: Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science 289, 1206–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McIntosh, A.R., Sekuler, A.B., Penpeci, C., Rajah, M.N., Grady, C.L., Sekuler, R., and Bennett, P.J., 1999: Recruitment of unique neural systems to support visual memory in normal aging. Current Biology 9, 1275–1278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merrill, E.G., and Wall, P.D., 1978: Plasticity of connection in the adult nervous system. In C.W. Cotman (ed.), Neuronal Plasticity. New York: Raven Press, pp. 94–111.Google Scholar
  35. Merzenich, M.M, Kaas, J.H., Sur, M., Nelson, R.J., and Felleman, D.J., 1983: Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys. Neuroscience, 639–665.Google Scholar
  36. Metzler, J., and Marks, P.S., 1979: Functional changes in cat somatic sensory-motor cortex during short-term reversible epidermal blocks. Brain Research 177, 379–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miles, F.A., and Lisberger, S.G., 1981: Plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular reflex: A new hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 4, 273–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penn, A.A., and Shatz, C.J., 1999: Brain waves and brain wiring: The role of endogenous and sensory-driven neural activity in development. Pediatric Research 45, 447–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pinker, S., 1997: How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Pylyshyn, Z., 1984: Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ramachandran, V.S., 1994: Phantom limbs, neglect syndromes, repressed memories, and Freudian psychology. International Review of Neurobiology 37, 291–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ridley, M., 1996: Evolution (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  43. Samuels, R., 1998: Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanes, J.N., Donoghue, J.P., Thangaraj, V., Edelman, R.R., and Warach, S., 1995: Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex. Science 268, 1775–1777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schweizer, P. forthcoming. Realization, reduction and psychological autonomy. Synthese.Google Scholar
  46. Shatz, C.J., 1996: Emergence of order in visual system development. Journal of Physiology – Paris 90, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sinninger, Y.S., Doyle, K.J., and Moore, J.K., 1999: The case for early identification of hearing loss in children. Auditory system development, experimental auditory deprivation, and development of speech perception and hearing. Pediatric Clinics in North America 46, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sober, E., 1984: The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sober, E., 2000: Philosophy of Biology (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  50. Symons, D., 1987: If we're all Darwinians, what's the fuss about? In C. Crawford, et al. (eds), Sociobiology and Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 121–146.Google Scholar
  51. Symons, D., 1992: On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In J.H. Barkow, et al. (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–159.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, R.F., 1993: The Brain: A Neuroscience Primer. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  53. Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L., 1992: The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, et al. (eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–136.Google Scholar
  54. Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L., 1995: Foreword. In S. Baron-Cohen, Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. xi–xviii.Google Scholar
  55. Wall, P.D. and Egger, M.D., 1971: Formation of new connections in adult rat brains after partial deafferentation. Nature, New Biology 232, 542–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Webster, M.J., Ungerleider, L.G., and Bachevalier, J., 1995: Development and plasticity of the neural circuitry underlying visual recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Physiological Pharmacology 73, 1364–1371.Google Scholar
  57. Winberg, J., and Porter, R.H., 1998: Olfaction and human neonatal behavior: Clinical implications. Acta Paediatrica 87, 6–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wong, R.O., 1999: Retinal waves and visual system development. Annual Review in Neuroscience 22, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Buller
    • 1
  • Valerie Hardcastle
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNorthern Illinois UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Science and Technology Studies Program / Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Department of PhilosophyVirginia Polytechnic and State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations