Skip to main content
Log in

Well modeling and estimation of hydraulic parameters

  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general model for time‐dependent saturated–unsaturated waterflow caused by a single well with a given radius is presented. The storage capacity of the well tube is taken into account. The inflow into the well (with drainage) is modeled using the Signorini boundary condition. The nonconforming mixed finite element method on a multilevel adaptive grid is used for the solution of the radial symmetric, time dependent problem. Finally, van Genuchten parameters of an aquifer are determined from field measurements by inverse computations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.N. Arnold and F. Brezzi, Mixed and nonconforming finite element methods: Implementation, postprocessing and error estimates, Math. Modelling Numer. Anal. 19(1) (1985) 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Baiocchi and A. Capelo, Variational and Quasivariational Inequalities (Wiley, Chichester, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Duvaut and J.L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.H.W. Hoppe and B. Wohlmuth, Adaptive multilevel techniques for mixed finite element discretizations of elliptic boundary value problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34(4) (1997) 1658–1681.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.P. Neumann and P.A. Witherspoon, Analysis of nonsteady flow with a free surface using the finite element method, Water Resources Research 7(3) (1971) 611–623.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I.S. Papadopulos and H.H. Cooper Jr, Drawdown in a well of large diameter, Water Resources Research 3(1) (1967) 241-244.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.A. Sudicky, A.J.J. Unger and S. Lacombe, A noniterative technique for the direct implementation of well bore boundary conditions in three dimensional heterogeneous formations, Water Resources Research 31(2) (1995) 411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.V. Theis, The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 16(1) (1935) 519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.Th. van Genuchten, A closed-form for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (1980) 892–898.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Vereecken, U. Döring, W. Drost, A. Georgescu, U. Jaekel, O. Neuendorf and R. Seidemann, Analysis of reactive solute transport in a heterogeous aquifer: The Krauthausen field experiment. 2. Determination of the hydraulic conductivity and local velocities, Water Resources Research, submitted.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schumacher, S., Slodička, M. & Jaekel, U. Well modeling and estimation of hydraulic parameters. Computational Geosciences 1, 317–331 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011529614975

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011529614975

Navigation