Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 161–167 | Cite as

Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer's disease; Ethical and clinical considerations

  • J. Vollmann
Article

Abstract

Advance patient directives are various forms of anticipatory medical directives made by competent individuals for the eventuality of future incompetence. They are therefore appropriate instruments for competent patients in the early stage of Alzheimer's disease to document their self-determined will in the advanced stages of dementia. Theoretical objections have been expressed against the concept of advance patient directives (problems of authenticity and identity) which, however, cannot negate the fundamental moral authority of advance patient directives. Therefore, patients, family members, and physicians should make use of the appropriate form of advance directive as part of common treatment and care planning. Advance directives, when utilized intelligently, represent appropriate instruments for shared decision-making by patient, family members and physician. They should be utilized to a greater extent, particularly for the treatment planning of demented patients.

advance directive Alzheimer's disease medical research patients' autonomy incompetence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelbaum, P.S. and T. Grisso: 1988, 'Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to Treatment', New. Engl. J. Med. 319, 1635–1638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berliner Ärztekammer: 1999, 'Berufsordnung der Ärztekammer Berlin', Berliner Ärzte 6/99, 25–35.Google Scholar
  3. Brock, D.W.: 1993, 'A proposal for the Use of Advance Directives in the Treatment of Incompetent Mentally Ill Persons', Bioethics 7, 247–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, A.E. and D.W. Brock: 1989, Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bundesärztekammer: 1998, 'Grundsätze der Bundesärztekammer zur ärztlichen Sterbebegleitung', Dt. Ärztebl. 95, C1690–1691.Google Scholar
  6. Bundesministerium der Justiz: 1994, Das neue Betreuungsgesetz.Bonn: Bundesministerium der Justiz, 5. edition.Google Scholar
  7. Dresser, R.: 1995, 'Dworkin on Dementia. Elegant Theory, Questionable Policy', Hastings Cent. Rep. 25 (6), 32–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Drickamer, M.A. and M.S. Lachs: 1992, 'Should Patients with Alzheimer's Disease be Told Their Diagnosis?', New Engl. J.Med. 326 (14), 947–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dworkin, R.: 1986, 'Autonomy and the Demented Self', Milbank Quart. 64 (Suppl. 2), 4–16.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenmann, M. and J. Richter: 1999, 'Relationships Between Various Attitudes Towards Self–Determination in Health Care with Special Reference to an Advance Directive', J. Med.Ethics 25, 37–41.Google Scholar
  11. Emanuel, L.: 1994, 'Appropiate and Inappropiate Use of Advance Directives', J. Clin. Ethics 5, 357–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Erde, E.L., E.C. Nadal and T.O. Scholl: 1988, 'On Truth Telling and the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease', J. Fam. Prac. 26, 401–406.Google Scholar
  13. Faden, R.R. and T.L. Beauchamp: 1986,A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Finucane, T.E., B.A. Beamer, R.P. Roca and C.H. Kawas: 1993, 'Establishing Advance Directives with Demented Patients: A Pilot Study', J. Clin. Ethics 4 (1), 51–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, T.: 1995, 'Auf der Suche nach der Verlorenen Zeit – Die Erinnerung in der Demenz', Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiat. 63, 38–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. High, D.M.: 1987, 'Planing for Decisional Incapacity. A Neglected Area in Ethics and Aging', J. Am. Geriat. Soc. 35, 814–820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnston, S.C., M.P. Pfeifer and R. McNutt for the End of Life Study Group: 1995, 'The Discussion About Advance Directives. Patient and Physician Opinions Regarding When and How it Should be Conducted', Arch. Intern. Med. 155, 1025–1030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitword, T.: 1993, 'Person and Process in Dementia', Int. J.Geriat. Psychiat. 8, 541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch, H.G.: 1996, 'Die Wertigkeit der Prospektiven Dokumentation', in: F. Anschütz and H.L. Wedler HL (eds.), Suizidprävention und Sterbehilfe. Berlin: Ullstein Mosby, pp. 227–233.Google Scholar
  20. Koch, H.G., S. Reiter–Theil and H. Helmchen (eds.): 1996, Informed Consent in Psychiatry. European Perspectives of Ethics, Law and Clinical Practice. Baden–Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  21. Kuczewski, M.G.: 1994, 'WhoseWill Is It, Anyway? A Discussion of Advance Directives, Personal Identity, and Consensus in Medical Ethics', Bioethics 8, 27–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Meran, J.G.: 1997, 'Patientenverfügungen aus ärztlicher Sicht', Wiener Med. Wschr. 147, 117–120.Google Scholar
  23. Miles, S.H., R. Koepp and E.P. Weber: 1996, 'Advance End–of–Life Treatment Planning. A Research Review', Arch. Intern. Med. 156, 1062–1068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olick, R.S.: 1991, 'Approximating Informed Consent and Fostering Communication: The Anatomy of an Advance Directive', J. Clin. Ethics 2, 181–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Reifler, B.V., E. Larson and R. Hanley: 1982, 'Coexistence of Cognitive Impairment and Depression in Geriatric Outpatients', Am. J. Psychiat. 139, 623–626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rieger, H.J.: 1995, 'Das “Sterbehilfe”–Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 13.9.1994', Dtsch. Med. Wschr. 120, 341–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiff, R., C. Rajkumar and C. Bulpitt: 2000, 'Views of Elderly People on LivingWills: Interview Study', BritishMed. J. 320, 1640–1641.Google Scholar
  29. Schöne–Seifert, B.: 1996, 'Medizinethik', in: J. Nida–Rümelin (ed.), Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung. Ein Handbuch. Stuttgart: Kröner, pp. 553–648.Google Scholar
  30. Sunderland, T. and R. Dukoff: 1997, 'Informed Consent with Cognitively Impaired Patients: An NIMH Perspective on the Durable Power of Attorney', in: A.E. Shamoo (ed.), Ethics in Neurobiological Research with Human Subjects. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breacher, pp. 229–238.Google Scholar
  31. Vollmann, J. and I. Knöchel–Schiffer: 1999, 'Patientenverfügungen in der klinischen Praxis', Med. Klin. 94, pp. 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vollmann, J.: 2000, Aufklärung und Einwilligung in der Psychiatrie.Ein Beitrag zur Ethik in der Medizin. Monographienreihe aus dem Gesamtgebiete der Psychiatrie. Darmstadt: Steinkopff.Google Scholar
  33. Warren, J.W., J. Sobal, J.H. Tenney, J.M. Hoopes, D. Damron, S. Levenson, B.R. deForge and H.L. Muncie: 1986, 'Informed Consent by Proxy. An Issue in Research with Elderly Patients', New Engl. J. Med. 315, 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Vollmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Für Geschichte der Medizin, Arbeitsgruppe Ethik in der MedizinFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations