Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 143–154 | Cite as

Feminist Philosophy and Information Systems

Abstract

This paper offers a new approach to the philosophical foundations of information systems (IS) through feminist philosophy and, in particular, feminist epistemology. This can be used to expose the universalizing tendency of many information systems and to show the importance of using real-life complex examples rather than the simplified examples often favored by philosophers. Within traditional epistemology and its relation to IS, subjectivity, the propositional/skills distinction and epistemic hierarchies are subject to arguments from feminist epistemology. With respect to the emerging critical school of IS, feminist epistemology, and within that, feminist standpoint theory, are used to examine the complexities of the positivist/anti-positivist position and the related concept of emancipation. In addition, it is argued that the liberal version of emancipation encapsulated in such systems may have an effect opposite to that of emancipation These issues are illustrated in an existing expert systems project.

philosophical foundations of IS feminist philosophy feminist epistemology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam A. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. London, New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Adam A, Emms J, Green E, Owen J. (Eds). IFIP Transactions A-57, Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries, Building New Forms. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Addelson KP. Moral Passages: Toward a Collectivist Moral Theory. New York, London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Alcoff L, Potter E. (Eds). Feminist Epistemologies. New York, London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Assiter A. Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age. London, New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Bjerknes G, Bratteteig T. FLORENCE in wonderland: System development with nurses. In: Bjerknes G, Ehn P. and Kyng M, eds. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury, 1987:279–295.Google Scholar
  7. Bloor D. Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. Camp T. The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline. Comm. ACM 1997; 40:103–110.Google Scholar
  9. Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A. The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Checkland P, Holwell S. Information, Systems and Information Systems—Making Sense of the Field. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. Churchman CW. The Systems Approach and its Enemies. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. Code L. Taking subjectivity into account. In: Alcoff L and Potter E, eds. Feminist Epistemologies. New York, London: Routledge, 1993:15–48.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen C. 101 Problems in Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Dalmiya V, Alcoff L. Are ‘old wives' tales’ justified? In: Alcoff L and Potter E, eds. Feminist Epistemologies. New York, London: Routledge, 1993:217–244.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrenreich B, English D. For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts' Advice to Women. London: Pluto Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  17. Green E, Adam A (Eds). Information, Communication and Society, 1999;2(4). London, NewYork: Routledge. Special issue on gender and information and communications technology.Google Scholar
  18. Haraway D. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Haraway D, ed. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 1991:183–201.Google Scholar
  19. Harding S. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Hekman S. Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. Hirschheim R. Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. In: Research Methods in Information Systems, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Colloquium Manchester Business School, 1–3 Sept., 1984, Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, and Wood-Harper T, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985:13–36.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschheim R, Klein H, Lyytinen K. Information Systems Development: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge, UK, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  24. Lenat D, Guha R. Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990.Google Scholar
  25. Lyotard JF. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Meehan J (ed). Feminists read Habermas; Gendering the Subject of Discourse. New York, London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. Newell A. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  28. Newell A, Simon H. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  29. Rose H. Love, Power and Language: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  30. Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1963. (original edition 1949).Google Scholar
  31. Schank R, Jona M. Issues for psychology, AI, and education: A review of Newell's Unified Theories of Cognition. Artificial Intelligence, 1993;59:375–388.Google Scholar
  32. Soar (1996). Frequently asked questions list online. Available: http://www.psyc.nott.ac.uk/users/ritter/soar-faq.html, March 29, 1996. Alternatively contact: Frank Ritter Dept. of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Tannen D. You Just don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. Wagner I. Women's voice: The case of nursing information systems. AI & Society 1993;7:295–310.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson F. The truth is out there: The search for emancipatory principles in information design. Information Technology and People, 1997;3:187–204.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Systems InstituteUniversity of SalfordSalford, ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations