Abstract
Hummingbird-pollinated flowers are frequently subjected to nectar robbing. In this paper, I examine the impact of nectar robbing on plant reproductive success on a hummingbird-pollinated species. After studying the basic aspects of the floral morphology and reproduction of Macleania bullata (Ericaceae) in a tropical montane wet forest in southwest Colombia, I examined the percent of flowers robbed and the effect of nectar robbery on fruit set. The flowers of this species are typical for plants pollinated by long-bill hummingbirds. They are protandrous and open for four days. Fruit production requires a pollinator visit; fruit set following pollinator exclusion was zero. Fruit set following xenogamous pollen transfer (36.8%) differed significantly from that of population controls (11.9%) and of autogamous pollen transfer (6.3%). Nectar volume, sugar concentration and sugar production were measured at daily intervals from bud opening until the fading of flowers. Daily nectar production (both volume and amount of sugar) varied considerably with flower age. Sugar production peaked on the second day, coinciding with the male phase. The frequency of nectar robbing in the studied population was very high (75% of examined flowers) and was positively correlated with reduced fruit set. I discuss the probability of a relation between reduced fruit set on robbed flowers and an energetic investment. Robbing by non-pollinating visitors can suppose the plant to re-synthesize more nectar. The high incidence of nectar robbing impugns the advantage of specialization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arizmendi, M. C., Domínguez, C. A. & Dirzo, R. 1996. The role of an avian robber and of hummingbird pollinators in the reproduction of two plant species. Funct. Ecol. 10: 119–127.
Bar-Shalom, D. & Mattson, O. 1977. Mode of hydration, an important factor in the germination of trinucleate pollen grains. Botanisk Tidsskrift 71: 245–251.
Bittrich, V. & Amaral, M. C. E. 1996. Pollination biology of Symphonia globulifera (Clusidiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 200: 101–110.
Carpenter, F. L., Hixon, M. A., Temeles, E. J., Russell, R. W. & Paton, D. C. 1993. Exploitative compensation by subordinate age-sex classes of migrant rufous hummingbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 305–312.
Cruden, R. W. & Hermann, S. M. 1983. Studying nectar? Some observations on the art. Pp. 223–241. In: Bentley, B. & Elias, T. S. (eds), The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, New York.
Cushman, J. H. & Beattie, A. J. 1991. Mutualisms: assessing the benefits to host and visitors. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 191–195.
Dukas, R. & Real, L. A. 1993. Effects of nectar variance on learning by bumble bees. Animal Behav. 45: 37–41.
Faegri, K. & van der Pijl, L 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Third edition. Pergamon, Oxford, UK.
Feinsinger, P. & Colwell, R. K. 1978. Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds. Am. Zool. 18: 779–795.
Free, J. B. & Butler, C. G. 1959. Bumblebees. Collins. London.
Galen, C. 1983. The effect of nectar-thieving ants on seedset in floralscent morphs of Polemoniun viscosum. Oikos 41: 245–249.
Graves, G. R. 1982. Pollination of a Tristerix Mistletoe (Loranthaceae) by Diglossa. Biotropica 14: 316–317.
Handel, S. N. 1983. Pollination ecology, plant population structure and gene flow. Pp. 163–211. In: Real, L. (ed), Pollination biology. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando, Florida.
Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1992. The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 6: 226–233.
Hawkins, R. P. 1961. Observations on the pollination of red clover by bees. I. The yield of seed in relation to the numbers and kinds of pollinators. Ann. Appl. Biol. 49: 55–65.
Heinrich, B. 1976. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology 57: 874–889.
Herrera, C. M. 1996. Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil's advocate approach. Pp. 65–87. In: Lloyd, D. G. & Barrett, S. C. H. (eds), Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Herrera, C.M. 2000. Flower-to-seedling consequences of different pollination regimes in an insect-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81: 15–29.
Holdridge, L. 1996. Ecología basada en zonas de vida. 4 reimpresión. Ed. IICA/CIRA.
Inouye, D. W. 1983. The ecology of nectar robbing. Pp. 153–174. In: Bentley, B. & Elias, T. S. (eds), The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press. New York.
Irwin, R. E. & Brody, A. K. 1998. Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia 116: 519–527.
Luteyn, J. L. 1989. Speciation and diversity of Ericaceae in neotropical montane vegetation. Tropical Forest: 297–310.
McDade, L. A. & Kinsman, S. 1980. The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34: 944–958.
Melampy, M. N. 1987. Flowering phenology, pollen flow and fruit production in the Andean shrub Befaria resinosa. Oecologia 73: 293–300.
Morris, W. F. 1996. Mutualism denied? Nectar-robbing bumble bees do not reduce female or male success of bluebells. Ecology 77: 1451–1462.
Navarro, L. (1999) Pollination ecology and effect of nectar removal in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Biotropica 31 (4): 618–625.
Powers, D. R. & Conley, T. M. 1994. Field metabolic rate and food consumption of two sympatric hummingbird species in southeastern Arizona. Condor 96: 141–150.
Pyke, G. H. 1991. How much does floral nectar cost? Nature 350: 58–59.
Roubik, D. W. 1982. The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology 63: 354–360.
Soberón, J. & Martínez del Río, C. 1985. Cheating and taking advantage. Pp. 192–213. In: Boucher, D. (ed.), The biology of mutualism: Ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
Southwick, E. E. 1984. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: A neglected energy investment. Ecology 65: 1775–1779.
Traveset, A., Willson, M. F. & Sabag, C. 1998. Effect of nectarrobbing birds on fruit set of Fuchsia magellanica in Tierra Del Fuego: a disrupted mutualism. Funct. Ecol. 12: 459–464.
Waser, N. M. 1979. Pollinator availability as a determinant of flowering time in ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens). Oecologia 39: 107–121.
Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 1043–1060.
Willmer, P. G. & Corbet, S. A. 1981. Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar robbers. Oecologia 51: 67–78.
Wyatt, R. 1980. The impact of nectar-robbing ants on the pollination system of Asclepias curassavica. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107: 24–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Navarro, L. Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Plant Ecology 152, 59–65 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011463520398
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011463520398