Skip to main content
Log in

The system management approach of biological weed control: Some theoretical considerations and aspects of application

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical considerations behind the system management approach of biological weed control are presented. These include, a part describing and explaining the effects of parasitic fungi on crop – weed competition, a part describing and explaining the epidemic spread of parasitic fungi on weeds, and a part relating crop – weed competition at the population level to epidemics. The theoretical framework developed may also provide a basis for the use of other natural enemies, like insects, for biological weed control following the system management approach. Aspects of application are discussed using data of the interaction between the annual weed Senecio vulgaris and the rust fungusPuccinia lagenophorae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, C.L. and L.V. Madden, 1990. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerkauskas, R.F., 1988. Latent colonization by Colletotrichum spp.: epidemiological considerations and implications for mycoherbicides. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 10: 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens, R., 1991. Aspects of the design, analysis and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technology 5: 664–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J.M., P.F. Kable and M. Catt, 1973. Epidemic spread of a rust imported for biological control. Nature 244: 462–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J.T., G.E. Templeton, R.J. Smith and W.T. Fox, 1973. Biological control of Northern jointvetch in rice with an endemic fungal disease. Weed Science 21: 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, C.T., 1960. On competition. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderzoek. 66: 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandino, F.J., 1993. Dispersive epidemic waves: I. Focus expansion within a linear planting. Phytopathology 83: 795–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank, L.G. and A.R. Watkinson, 1990. On the effects of competition: from monocultures to mixtures. In: J.B. Grace and D. Tilman (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, J., 2000. Disease epidemics and plant competition: control of Senecio vulgaris with Puccinia lagenophorae. Basic and Applied Ecology 1, in press.

  • Frantzen, J. and P.E. Hatcher, 1997. A fresh view on the control of the annual plant Senecio vulgaris. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 2: 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, J. and H. Müller-Schärer, 1998. A theory relating focal epidemics to crop-weed interactions. Phytopathology 88: 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, J. and H. Müller-Schärer, 1999. Wintering of the biotrophic fungus Puccinia lagenophorae within the annual plant Senecio vulgaris: implications for biological weed control. Plant Pathol. 48: 483–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, J. and F. van den Bosch, 2000. Spread of organisms: can travelling and dispersive waves be distinguished? Basic and Applied Ecology 1: 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, S., 1972. Specificity and host specialization of Puccinia chondrillina. Ann. Appl. Biol. 72: 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kira, T., H. Ogawa and N. Sakazaki, 1953. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. I. Competition-yield-density interrelationship in regularly dispersed populations. J. Inst. Polytech. Osaka City Univ. Ser. D 4: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, K.J., 1982. The benefits and potential hazards of genetic heterogeneity in plant pathogens. In: R. Charudattan and H.L. Walker (eds), Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schärer, H. and J. Frantzen, 1996. An emerging system management approach for biological weed control in crops: Senecio vulgaris as research model. Weed Res. 36: 483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D., 1989. The effects of Puccinia lagenophorae on Senecio vulgaris in competition with Euphorbia peplus. J. Ecol. 77: 552–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D. and P.G. Ayres, 1984. Effects of rust and post-infection drought on photosynthesis, growth and water relations in groundsel. Plant Pathol. 33: 561–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D. and P.G. Ayres, 1986a. Interference between healthy and rusted groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.) within mixed populations of different densities and proportions. New Phytol. 104: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D. and P.G. Ayres, 1986b. Seasonal effects on rust disease (Puccinia lagenophorae) of Senecio vulgaris. Symbiosis 2: 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D. and P.G. Ayres, 1987a. Water stress modifies intraspecific interference between rust (Puccinia lagenophorae Cooke)-infected and healthy groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.). New Phytol. 106: 555–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D. and P.G. Ayres, 1987b. Effects of rust infection of Senecio vulgaris on competition with lettuce. Weed Res. 27: 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N.D. and P.G. Ayres, 1990. Effects of interactions between nutrient supply and rust infection of Senecio vulgaris L. on competition with Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic. New Phytol. 114: 667–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F., 1999. Quantification of the effects of herbicides on the disease epidemic caused by the rust fungus Puccinia lagenophorae Cooke on the plant Senecio vulgaris L. MSc Thesis, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg. 105 pp.

  • Shigesada, N. and K. Kawasaki, 1997. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 205 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and P. Stiling, 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecology 77: 1965–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • TeBeest, D.O., 1988. Additions to the host range of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene. Plant Dis. 72: 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, G.E., D.O. TeBeest and R.J. Smith, 1984. Biological weed control in rice with a strain of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. used as a mycoherbicide. Crop Protection 3: 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M.B. and A.J. Willis, 1998. Biocontrol-risky but necessary? TREE 13: 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, F., H.D. Frinking, J.A.J. Metz and J.C. Zadoks, 1988a. Focus expansion in plant disease. III: Two experimental examples. Phytopathology 78: 919–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, F., J.C. Zadoks and J.A.J. Metz, 1988b. Focus expansion in plant disease: I. The constant rate of focus expansion. Phytopathology 78: 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, F., J.C. Zadoks and J.A.J. Metz, 1988c. Focus expansion in plant disease: II. Realistic parameter-sparse models. Phytopathology 78: 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson, A.R., 1980. Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants. J. Theor. Biol. 83: 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson, A.R., 1981. Interference in pure and mixed populations of Agrostemma githago. J. Appl. Ecol. 18: 967–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson, A.R. and R.P. Freckleton, 1997. Quantifying the impact of arbuscular mycorrhiza on plant competition. J. Ecol. 85: 541–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G.J., 1971. The ecology and control of Skeleton weed (Chondrilla juncea) in Australia. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 37: 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J.C. and R.D. Schein, 1979. Epidemiology and Plant Disease Management. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frantzen, J., Paul, N. & Müller-schärer, H. The system management approach of biological weed control: Some theoretical considerations and aspects of application. BioControl 46, 139–155 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011442914263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011442914263

Navigation