Skip to main content
Log in

Does Monitoring of Post-Tetanic Count Prevent Alarms of Airway Pressure or Visible Muscle Activity during Intratracheal Jet Ventilation?

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective.Profound neuromuscular block (NMB) quantifiedby post-tetanic count (PTC) may prevent all muscle activity during anesthesia. We studied whether monitoring of PTC prevents airway pressure alarms or visible movements of the vocal cords and the abdomen during endo-laryngeal procedures (ELPs). Methods.In this prospective, double blind, study 50 healthy (ASA 1–3) patients scheduled for ELPs were randomized into five groups: atracurium, mivacurium, rocuronium, vecuronium and succinylcholine. During alfentanil-propofol anaesthesia, profound NMB was controlled by monitoring the PTC (target level PTC 0–2, 50 Hz titanic stimulation) of the adductor pollicis muscle. The muscle relaxants were administered using bolus dosing in all groups but in the succinylcholine group. The early signs of recovery of NMB to be observed were: 1) airway pressure alarms, 2) movements of vocal cords on the laryngeal video monitor and 3) movements of the abdomen. The inference was based on90% confidence interval tests. Results.During 50 ELP:s following signs of early recovery of NMB were recognized: 2 alarms of airway pressure, 16 laryngeal movements and 11 movements of the abdomen. The proportion of airway pressure alarms was significantly lower than proportion of all detectable movements (95% confidence interval analysis). Twelve of the movements were recorded at PTC zero level. The signs of early recovery of NMB were detected in all groups.Conclusions.PTC-monitoring following 50 Hz stimulation does not ensure total inactivity of muscles during alfentanil-propofol anesthesia, regardless which relaxant has been chosen. During ELPs, simultaneous observation of the vocal cords and the abdomen is more sensitive in detecting early recovery of NMB compared to our method of airway pressure monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Roberts FL, Dixon J, Lewis GT, Tackley RM, Prys-Roberts C. Induction and maintenance of propofol anaesthesia. A manual infusion scheme. Anaesthesia 1988; 43Suppl: 14–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baer GA, Paloheimo M, Rahnasto J, Pukander J. End-tidal oxygen concentration and pulse oximetry for monitoring oxygenation during intratracheal jet ventilation. J Clin Monit 1995; 11: 373–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baer GA. Intratracheal jet ventilation for endolaryngeal procedures. Thesis, 1985. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 187

  4. Howardy-Hansen P, Viby-Mogensen J. Tactile evaluation of the posttetanic count (PTC). Anesthesiology 1984; 60: 372–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Viby-Mogensen J. Monitoring of neuromuscular block. In Swen J, et al (eds): New developments in neuromuscular relaxant drugs. Leiden, Boerhave Committee for postgraduate Medical Education, 1984: 71

    Google Scholar 

  6. Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chraemmer-Jörgensen B. Post tetanic count (PTC): A new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 1981; 55: 458–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eriksson LI, Lennmarken C, Staun P, Viby-Mogensen J. Use of post-tetanic count in assesment of a repetitive vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 487–493

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Silverman DG, Brull SJ. The effect of a tetanic stimulus on the response to subsequent tetanicstimulation. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 1284–1287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Merle JC, Jurczyk M, D'Honneur G, Ruggier R, Duvaldestin P. Onset of neuromuscular block is the same if the ipsilateral or contralaterallimb to the injection site is used for monitoring. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 333–334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernando PUE, Viby-Mogensen J, Bonsu AK. Relationship between post tetanic count and response to carinal stimulation during vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesth Scand 1987; 31: 593–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandes LA, Stout RG, Silverman DG, Brull SJ. Comparative recovery of 50-Hz and 100-Hz posttetanic twitch following profound neuromuscular block. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9: 48–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meistelman C, Plaud B, Donati F. Neuromuscular effects of succinylcholine on the vocal cords and adductor pollicis muscles. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 278–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CE, Donati F, Bevan DR. Potency of succinylcholine at the diaphragm and at the adductor pollicis muscle. Anesth Analg 1988; 67(7): 625–630

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D'Honneur G, Kirov K, Slavov V, Duvaldestin P. Effects of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx and diaphragm: An electromyographic study in humans. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 951–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee C, Katz RL. Neuromuscular pharmacology. A clinical update and commentary. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 173–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Puura AI, Rorarius MG, Manninen P, Hopput S, Baer GA. The costs of intense neuromuscular block for anesthesia during endolaryngealprocedures due to waiting time. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1335–1339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saddler JM, Marks LF, Norman J. Comparison of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block in rectus abdominis and hand muscles of man. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 26–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puura, A.I.E., Rorarius, M.G., Laippala, P. et al. Does Monitoring of Post-Tetanic Count Prevent Alarms of Airway Pressure or Visible Muscle Activity during Intratracheal Jet Ventilation?. J Clin Monit Comput 16, 523–528 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011431723515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011431723515

Navigation