Abstract
This paper provides an empirical analysis of the growing institutional divergence of systemic transformation in the countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Based upon the institutional theory of economic and legal systemic change, we empirically analyse reforms in a sector where the transformation process proved to be particularly tough: the energy sector. We test to what extent reforms reflect the ideal types seen in Western contexts (e.g. Anglo-Saxon and French), and to what extent new models have emerged. By generalising the results from the energy sector, one key finding emerges: starting from similar reform projects, ‘transition’ in Eastern Europe has led to fundamentally different outcomes, of which we identify three ideal types: i) the reforming Central/Eastern European market economy; ii) the post-Soviet mixed economy; and iii) the Caspian state economy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bomsel, O.: 1995, Enjeux industriels du post-socialisme. Revue d'Economie Industrielle.
Brock, G.: 1999, Transition = Improved Revenue Performance Plus Elektrificatsiya? A Look at Irkutsk Region During the Early Transition Era, Moct-Most, 9,(2), 201-213
Buchanan, J. M.: 1975, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Clement, H., and Jungfer, J. (eds.): 1998, Den Transformationsfortschritt messen: Die staatliche Einflußnahme auf die Wirtschaftstätigkeit in ausgewählten Transformationsstaaten, Weltforum Verlag, München, ifo Studien zur Osteuropa-und Transformationsforschung 29.
Cornia, G. A., and Vladimir P.: 1998, Transition and Long-Term Growth: Conventional Versus Non-Conventional Determinants', Moct-Most, 8, 7-32.
Dallago, B.: 1999, Convergence and Divergence of Economic Systems: A Systemic-Institutional Perspective, Economic Systems, 23,(2), June, 168-172.
De Melo, M., and Alan Gelb: 1996, A Comparative Analysis of Twenty-Eight Transition Economies in Europe and Asia, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics. 37,(5), 265-285.
EBRD (various issues), Transition Report, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London.
Funke, Norbert: 1993, Timing and Sequencing of Reforms: Competing Views and the Role of Credibility, Kyklos, 46, 337-362.
Havrylyshyn, et al.: 1999, Growth in Transition Economies 1990-97: An Econometric Analysis with Application to Ukraine, in: Siedenberg, Axel and Lutz Hoffmann (eds.), Ukraine at the Crossroads - Economic Reform in International Perspective, Physica, Heidelberg, New York.
Heybey, B., and Murrell P.: 1997, The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed of Liberalization During Transition. Working Paper, University of Maryland.
Hirschhausen, C. von: 1996, Du combinat socialiste à l'entreprise capitaliste - une analyse des reformes industrielles en Europe de l'Est, L'Harmattan, Paris.
Hirschhausen, C. von: 1998, Industrial Restructuring in Ukraine Seven Years after Independence: From Socialism to a Planning Economy?, Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, 10,(4), 451-465.
Hölscher, J.: 1998 Zur Formierung marktwirtschaftlichere Ordnungen in Zentralosteuropa (On the Formation of Economic Orders in East-Central Europe), Applied Economics Quarterly (Konjunkturpolitik), 44,(4), 393-422.
International Energy Agency: 1992, The Role of IEA Governments in Energy, IEA/OECD, Paris.
Klugman, J.: 1998, Uzbekistan: Institutional Continunity Helps Performance, Moct-Most, 8,(1), 63-82
Meske, W. 1998, Institutional Transformation of S&T Systems in the European Economies in Transition, WZB Discussion Paper P98-403.
Murell, P.: 1996, The Transition According to Cambridge, Mass, Journal of Economic Literature, 33,(1), 164-178.
Newberry, D. M.: 1994, Restructuring and Privatizing Electric Utilities in Eastern Europe, Economics of Transition, 2,(3), 291-316.
Nuti, D.: 1999, Comparative Economics after the Transition, Economic Systems, 23,(2), June, 155-159.
Schmieding, Holger: 1993, From Plan to Market: On the Nature of the Transformation Crisis, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 129, 216-253.
Schrettl, W.: 1999, Is Transition Over?, Economic Bulletin, Editorial, 36,(9).
Stern, J. and Junior R. Davis: 1998, Regulatory Reform in the Electricity Sector in Eastern Europe, Economics of Transition, 6,(2), 427-460.
Stiglitz, J. E.: 1999, Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition, Washington, Paper prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 28-30.
Streit, M. and Uwe Mummert: 1996, Grundprobleme der Systemtransformation aus institutionenök-onomischer Perspektive, Jena, Max-Planck-Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Discussion Paper 09-96.
Voigt, S. and Kiwit D.: 1996, Black Markets, Mafiosi and the Prospect for Economic Development in Russia - Analyzing the Interplay of External and Internal Institutions, Jena, Max-Planck-Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Discussion Paper 05-95.
Waelde, T., and Gunderson J. L.: 1996, Legislative Reform in Transition Economies - Western Transplants - a Shortcut to Social Market Economy Status?, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43, April, 347-378.
Waelde, T. and Hirschhausen C. von: 1999, Regulatory Reform in the Energy Industry of Post-Soviet Countries: The Third Way?, in: Seidman, A., Seidman, R.B. and Waelde, T. (eds.): Making Development Work: Legislative Reform for Institutional Transformation and Good Governance, Kluwer Law International, London.
Welfens, P.J.J.: 1998, Die Russische Transformationskrise: Monetäre und reale Aspekte sowie Politikoptionen, Potsdam, European Institute for International Economic Relations, Discussion Paper 54.
World Bank: 1996, World Development Report 1996 - From Plan to the Market, Washington, D.C..
World Bank: 1997, World Development Report 1997 - The State in a Changing World, Washington, D.C..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Von Hirschhausen, C., Waelde, T.W. The End of Transition: An Institutional Interpretation of Energy Sector Reform in Eastern Europe and the CIS. MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies 11, 93–110 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011378017940
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011378017940