Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the MCH Certificate Program was threefold: to develop a new educational initiative in response to national and local demands for increased MCH workforce capacity, to eliminate key financial and nonfinancial barriers to advanced MCH academic preparation, and to improve rates of recruitment and retention of students from minority communities, thus enhancing the quality of MCH services available to the region. Methods: An MCH Certificate Program, designed for clinicians (e.g., nurses, occupational therapists and nutritionists) and public health practitioners as a bridge to graduate programs in public health, combined a competency based curriculum with skills workshops, leadership seminars, mentoring, small group activities, and an interactive teaching format. Results: Students from the first two cohorts (n = 45) report an expansion of core public health knowledge (issues, policies, and strategies), enhanced self-confidence, and efficacy. Half have experienced job changes that represent increased responsibility, leadership, and professional advancement. A third are enrolled in or have completed a formal program of graduate study in MCH. Conclusions: This innovative MCH Certificate Program, now in its fourth year, is a new approach to increasing workforce capacity and a successful model of instruction for adult learners. It has the potential for adaptation to a variety of educational settings and MCH populations, and helps to expand the continuum of MCH training experiences in schools of public health.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Clark NM, Weist E. Mastering the new public health. Am J Pub Health 2000;90:1208–11.
Gebbie KM. Who's minding the public health store? J Pub Health Manag Pract 1999;5:vii, viii.
Gebbie KM, Hwang I. Preparing currently employed public health nurses for changes in the health system. Am J Pub Health 2000;90:716–21.
Geiger HJ. Comment: Ethnic cleansing in the groves of academe. Am J Pub Health 1998;88:1299, 1300.
Office of Research, Health Assessment and Data Systems. The health of Boston: A report on Boston residents and neighborhoods. Boston: Boston Public Health Commission, 1998.
Title V Block Grant Program Guidance and Forms for Application and Annual Report. http://www.hhs.gov/hrs/mchb/guidance.htm#titlev, 1998.
Perry LA. The bridge program: An overview. The ABFN J 1997;8:4–7.
Bishop-Clark C, Lynch JM. The mixed age college classroom. Coll Teach 1990;40:114–7.
Cantor JC, Bergeisen L, Baker LC. Effect of an intense educational program for minority college students and recent graduates on the probability of acceptance to medical school. JAMA 1998;280:772–6.
Hayes E. Insights from women's experiences for teaching and learning. In: E Hayes, editor. Effective teaching styles. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
Piane GM, Rydman RJ, Rubens AJ. Learning style preferences of public health students. J Med Systems 1996;20:377–84.
Fisher B. The heart has its reasons: Feelings, thinking and community building in feminist education. Women's Stud Q 1987;15:47–58.
Belenky MF, Clinchy BM, Goldberger NR, Tarule JM. Women's ways of knowing: The development of voice, self and mind. NY: Basic Books, 1986.
Kolb D. Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer & Co., 1976.
Dievler A, Grason H, Guyer B. MCH functions framework: A guide to the role of government in Maternal and Child Health in the 21st century. Matern Child Health J 1997;1:5–13.
Association of Teachers of Maternal & Child Health. Competencies for education in maternal and child health. Arlington VA: ATMCH, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein, J., Paine, L.L., Smith, J. et al. The MCH Certificate Program: A New Path to Graduate Education in Public Health. Matern Child Health J 5, 53–60 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011349902582
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011349902582