Abstract
In its drive for higher efficiency and effectiveness in higher education, the Australian Commonwealth Government released its policy on higher education, Higher Education: A Policy Statement during the late 1980s which contributed to the introduction of performance indicators to manage and assess the performance of the higher education system. The research component of annual Commonwealth funding to universities, called the Research Quantum, is now distributed by a set of performance indicators: external research income, publications count and higher degree research completions. This paper analysed the impact of these indicators on the research activities of Australian university academics based on Leibenstein's model of X-efficiency. Although the impact of performance indicators on university academics was found to follow the pressure-effort relationship, for some respondents, the increase in effort as a result of heightened pressure had involved strategic behaviour. Two conditions that are identified for the minimisation of an institution's X-inefficiency despite high staff effort are a high ratio of maximising to non-maximising decisions for both the staff and institution, and for all the institution's essential objectives/activities, and not just those which are measured by the performance indicators. The implications of these findings for the development and application of performance indicators are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Broadbent, D.E. (1971). Decisions and Stress. Academic Press.
Cave, M. & Hanney, S. (1990). Performance Indicators for Higher Education and Research. In M. Cave, M. Kogan & R. Smith (eds.), Output and Performance Measurement in Government: The State of the Art. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Cave, M., Hanney, S. & Kogan, M. (1991). The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice (2nd edn.). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Dawkins, J.S. (1988). Higher Education: A Policy Statement. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Department of Education, Employment, Training, and Youth Affairs (1997). Annual Report 1996–97 Programme 2: Higher Education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Frantz, R. (1988). X-efficiency: Theory, Evidence and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frantz, R. (1990). X-efficiency: Past, Present and Future. In K. Weiermair & M. Perlman (eds.), Studies in Economic Rationality: X-efficiency Examined and Extolled. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Gaither, G., Nedwek, B.P. & Neal, J.E. (1994). Measuring Up: The Promise and Pitfalls of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Washington: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Goedegebuure, L.C.J., Maassen, P.A.M. & Westerheijden, D.F. (eds.) (1990). Peer Review and Performance Indicators: Quality Assessment in British and Dutch Higher Education. Utrecht: Lemma.
Harman, G. (1998). Audit Doubts over Academic Publishing, Campus Review March 13–24, 12.
Harman, G. and Wood, F. (1990). Academics and Their Work under Dawkins: A Study of Five NSW Universities, Australian Educational Researcher 17(2), 53-74.
Kemp, D.A. (1999a). Knowledge and Innovation: A Policy Statement on Research and Research Training. Canberra: Department of Education, Training, and Youth Affairs.
Kemp, D.A. (1999b). Higher Education Report for the 2000–2002 Triennium. Canberra: Department of Education, Training, and Youth Affairs.
Kravchuk, R.S. & Schack, R.W. (1996). Designing Effective Performance-Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, Public Administration Review 56(4), 348-358.
Leibenstein, H. (1976). Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Microeconomics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pressure.
Leibenstein, H. (1978). On the Basic Proposition of X-efficiency Theory, American Economic Review 68(2), 328-334.
Leibenstein, H. (1982). Worker Motivation and X-efficiency Theory: A Comment, Journal of Economic Issues XVI(3), 872-873.
Leibenstein, H. (1983). Property Rights and X-efficiency: Comment, American Economic Review 73(4), 831-842.
Leibenstein, H. (1984). The Japanese Management System: An X-efficiency-game Theory Analysis. In M. Aoki (ed.), The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Leibenstein, H. (1987). Inside the Firm: The Inefficiencies of Hierarchy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayo, T. (1990). Performance Indicators for Community Organisations. New South Wales: Council of Social Service of New South Wales.
McInnis, C. (1992). Changes in the Nature of Academic Work, The Australian Universities' Review 35(2), 9-12.
Minium, E.W. (1978). Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education (2nd edn.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
Poister, T.H. & Streils, G. (1999). Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice, Public Administration Review 59(4), 325-335.
Porter, A. (1988). Indicators: Objective Data or Political Tool?, Phi Delta Kappan 69(7), 503-508.
Raelin, J.A. (1995). How to Manage Your Local Professor, Academy of Management Journal, Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 207-214.
Roberts, H. (1990). Performance and Outcome Measures in the ealth Service. In M. Cave, M. Kogan & R. Smith (eds.), Output and Performance Measurement in Government: The State of the Art. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Spee, A. & Bormans, R. (eds.) (1991). Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Taylor, J. (2001). The Impact of Performance Indicators on the Work of University Academics: Evidence from Australian Universities, Higher Education Quarterly 55, forthcoming.
Wood, F. (1990). Factors Affecting Research Performance of University Academic Staff, Higher Education 19, 81-100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, J. Efficiency by Performance Indicators? Evidence from Australian Higher Education. Tertiary Education and Management 7, 41–55 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011349020908
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011349020908